Quantcast
Channel: Everything Audio Network
Viewing all 180 articles
Browse latest View live

Home Recording Review!PreSonus Sceptre S8 StudioActive Coaxial Loudspeaker

$
0
0
Brevis...
Price: $1,500 per pair
Likes: accuracy, easy setup
Dislikes: needs a bit more power
Wow Factor: coaxial design hits the mark
More info: Presonus S8


by John Gatski
  Well-designed, coaxial-driver speakers exhibit clean, phase coherent sonic projection which enhances accuracy. Based on my extensive use of the PreSonus Sceptre S8 speakers the company has done a great job synergizing the coaxial drivers and onboard DSP, digital amplification. In fact, the sound is well above the normal DSP/powered speaker I normally audition for studio use.

Features
  The Sceptre series comes in two models: the S6 and the S8 tested here. Both models feature a horn-loaded, compression tweeter mounted in the center of the woofer: a 6-inch bass driver for the S6 and an 8-inch for the S8. For this review, I will focus on the S8, which is priced at $1,500 per pair.
  Both models are based on CoActualTM Speaker Coherence Alignment and TQTM Temporal Equalization Technology from Fulcrum Acoustic. Complementing the coaxial drivers is a 32-bit, floating-point DSP engine that optimizes the drivers’ performance and 180W of digital amplification (90 watts for each driver).
  The Sceptre series was designed by Dave Gunness, vice president of R and D at Fulcrum Acoustics, and the company’s lead product designer. PreSonus also added just enough features/adjustments to make it fit into most placement scenarios. Although I have seen DSP-based speakers that are overly featured and complex, the Sceptre S8 is rather straight forward and easy to set up.

Tuning the  S8 to the room is easy with onboard DSP

  The Sceptre features two balanced analog input choices: XLR and 1⁄4-inch TRS; an Input-level control with 10 dB of gain above unity; a high-frequency driver adjustment (linear, +1 dB, -1.5 dB, -4 dB) above 2 kHz; high-pass filter switch (linear, 60 Hz, 80 Hz, 100 Hz) with -24 dB/octave slope; and acoustic space switch (linear, -1.5 dB, -3 dB, -6 dB) to compensate for bass boost when the speaker is placed near a wall.
  The speakers are fairly compact at 11.4-inches wide (290 mm) x 11.8-inches front to back (300 mm) and 15.75-inches tall (400 mm). Weight for the S8 is just over 24 pounds. Though the cabinet is not as solid feeling as an audiophile speaker, or some of the other high-end powered studio speakers I have used, the Scepter sonic character is not compromised by the cabinet construction. The adequately braced cabinet keeps the mid bass and midrange frequencies audibly clean.
  Spec-wise, the S8 is factory rated from 46 Hz to 20 kHz, plus or minus 3 dB (With an RTA, I measured 48 Hz with the speaker free standing in the middle of the room). Peak SPL is listed at 116 dB. Crossover frequency is centered at 2.4 kHz. The bass extension of the 8-inch driver is enhanced by the slot port mounted on the front of the cabinet. Front ports, in my opinion, have fewer side effects than rear ports, and allow closer-to-wall placement.

  I was impressed with the PreSonus Scepter S8. The phase-coherent, coaxial design, coupled with a good Class-D amp and DSP-processing/digital crossover, this speaker conveys an audiophile accuracy and good bass extension to reasonably loud levels.

  The Sceptre is designed to be used in pro audio/home recording setups, and with the onboard controls, you can place them almost anywhere in a small-to-medium room. Placement options include console/mixer meter bridge, computer workstation desk, as well as stands. You can set the S8s up in a 2.0 — or a 5.1 arrangement on stands, away from boundaries in a listening room.
  I used the S8s in all the above scenarios (except 5.1), and, additionally, as a powered audiophile monitor in my hi-end audiophile room, where they demonstrated a high-end, sonic character normally not heard in a budget-priced powered loudspeakers.

The setup
  I first set up the Sceptre as near-field monitors next to my Oram 16T analog console/Macbook Pro workstation desk setup. I placed the speakers on each side of the console using Raxxcess speaker stands, which put them right at ear height. I angled the speakers in slightly for maximum frontal dispersion.
  I connected a set of the console’s XLR monitor outputs to the S8’s inputs, and did a six-hour break-in, playing hi-res music from the Macbook Pro/Benchmark DAC2-D connected to the console's inputs. I used Wireworld Gold Eclipse7balanced XLR cables ($700 per pair) for the entire system, and I plugged all components into an Essential Sound Products Essence II power strip.

The audition
  The first audible attribute I noticed on casual play of 24/192 music, was how accurate the Sceptres are. The speakers have an audiophile-class midrange and top-end with a focused, tight bottom end in the 50-Hz to 100 Hz range. Most powered pro speakers that sound this good are well above the $1,000 per speaker. I am impressed.
  My favorite recording tasks are acoustic and jazz guitar. During playback of a new Taylor 810 dreadnaught recording, recorded with two Audix SCA-25A microphones via the the Oram’s mic pre-to-direct-output into a TASCAM DA-3000 recorder in 24/192, the playback through the S8’s was quite revealing.
  The guitar’s stereo width and depth via the pick attack was fantastic. The ultra nuance of room reverb and string “pluck” harmonics came through loud and clear with no aberrations. The S8‘s high frequency range showcased the Audix mics’ slight presence boost without sounding shrill and edgy. The S8 amp’s were just as impressive. I am normally not a Class-D powered speaker kind of guy, but as long as you keep the level in the low 90 dBs on peaks, the smooth factor sticks around. Only when I played really loud pop music, did I notice the Sceptre amp character start to harden.


The S8's back panel

  On a Yamaha U1 upright piano recording using a pair of Audio-Technica AT-4041B and a True P2 microphone preamp and the DA-3000 as the recorder. Again, the Sceptre’s playback sonic scenario was faithful to the instrument. No etched treble bump in the high register keys, good imaging and clean bass, and like my hi-fi passive speaker/amp combo playback, much of the room reverb/reflections could clearly be heard. These monitors are that good.
  In the open room listening scenario, with speakers about eight feet from my listening position, the S8s never labored to produce ample sound level in this medium -size listening room. The S8’s coaxial design and crossover slope also contributes to excellent vocal reproduction — with minimal sibilance and well-balanced tone for male or female voice.
  I even hooked the PreSonus S8 pair into my high-end audiophile system. The audio came from a Pass Labs XP-10 MOSFET line preamplifier and lots of hi-resolution music playback through a Macbook Pro, equipped with Audirvana software player, linked to an Oppo HA-1 audiophile DAC. I played a range of music from 24/96 all the way to 24/384 and double speed DSD.

  The S8 relaysed the cymbals in generous portions, even compared to my expensive reference system. And unlike many powered pro speakers that use metal-dome high-end drivers, there is no exaggerated edginess to the S8’s top-end.

  As with my home recording monitoring sessions, The S8s filled the room with accurate, detailed sound and good bass. That port does a good job of enhancing low bass performance in the 50-Hz range — without loading the mid-bass. Best of all, the small treble sounds, room reverb tails, acoustic guitar harmonics, etc., could clearly be heard through the S8s. No, it does not project the ultimate space of my MartinLoganelectrostatics, but then again, the Sceptres are not $10,000. For $1,500, I could hear plenty from these speakers.
  One of my subjective listening benchmarks for a speaker, is the degree of dimensionality presented when playing the Tom Jung-recorded Warren Bernhard— So Real SACD, produced in 2000. On the title cut, the cymbal sound is one of the most accurate capture of that instrument I have ever heard; there is an enveloping presentation of the recording’s drum cymbal when listening from a properly designed speaker.
  I can say with confidence, that the S8 relayed the cymbals in generous portions, even compared to my expensive reference system. And unlike many powered pro speakers that use metal-dome high-end drivers, there is no exaggerated edginess to the S8’s top-end.
  Although I did not have extra S8’s for multichannel listening, I would recommend them for 5.1, 7.1, 9.1 or 11.1 monitor duties when mixing multi-channel music or movie soundtracks. You just need a sub or two for lower-octave bass. And the speaker’s compact size makes them that much easier to place.

The verdict
  As I have said many times, I am, normally, not a powered monitor fan, I like choosing my own amps and speakers, but there are advantages to electronic crossovers and amps incorporated into one package, if done correctly. However, the powered speakers I have raved about usually are on the pricier side of the equation.
  But I was impressed with the PreSonus Scepter S8. The phase-coherent, coaxial design, coupled with a good class D amp and DSP-processing/digital crossover, this speaker conveys an audiophile accuracy and good bass extension to reasonably loud levels.


Front port slot keeps the bass extended and tight

  The only niggle in the review is that I heard a bit of raggedness at the upper power limit of the amp when playing 95 dB+ levels. Of course, I am comparing the S8s to my reference speakers with multi-thousand dollar Class A or A/B audiophile amps. At reasonable levels though, the 90-watt digital amps are pretty darn clean.
  For recording studio tracking, mixing, editing, even mastering, the PreSonus Scepter S8 is an recommended powered speaker. Its quality also should carry over to 5.1-channel audio monitoring as well. A grand per speaker is more than a $300 class powered speaker that pervades the market these days, but the price tag is not unreasonable for a powered speaker this good. Consequently, we have awarded it our Everything Audio NetworkStellar Sound Award.

   John Gatski is publisher/owner of the Everything Audio NetworkArticles on this site are the copyright of the Everything Audio Network©Any unauthorized use, via print or Internet, without written permission is prohibited.



Audiophile Review!Essence HDACC 24/192 ADC/DACStereo Preamp/Headphone Amp:Bargain Price Converter/PreampIncludes Multiple I/O WITH HDMI

$
0
0

Brevis...
Price: $699
Likes: HDMI, 3x digital I/O, A/D
Dislikes: lacks bit status display
Wow Factor: do-it-all A/D-/D/A
More info: Essence HDACC


by John Gatski
   I love cool little gadgets that are accomplished multi-taskers. Back in the 1990s, digital recording and mastering engineer Bob Katz came up with a box called the FCN-1, a digital I/O that served professional audio engineers by converting from one output format to another and removing and/or ignoring copy code restrictions when making digital dubs for pro use. The Essence HDACC reminds me of that quite-useful FCN-1 with its multiple in/outs, including HDMI. Plus it is quite a good DAC and headphone amp as well.

Features
   Priced at a bargain price of $699, the Essence HDACC is a 24-bit/192 DAC with built-in headphone amp, fixed-level 24/192 A/D, a built-in sample rate converter, SPDIF/TOSLink digital I/O, HDMI digital input for stereo playback (one of the few DACS that even have HDMI), balanced and unbalanced analog output, and analog input for playback through the preamp or feeding the A/D. To further showcase its multiple input dexterity, the Essence HDACC also has USB 2.0 input for computer playback — up to 24/192.
  The HDACC does not natively play DSD from HDMI or USB sources. However, if your Blu-ray player converts DSD-to-PCM (many do), that audio can be transmitted through the HDM to the HDACC. The DAC then outputs the PCM through the DAC. Oppo players, for example, convert the DSD bitstream from a SACD, convert it to 24/88.2 and is output through the HDMI. My Marantz UD-7007 does the same. The DSD-to-PCM loses a little bit of its natural smoothness and transients versus the native DSD bitstream decoding, but it is hi-res enough. Better than 16/48.
  The Essence HDACC features an ESS Sabre DAC, Cirrus A/D chip, adjustable impedance HP impedance-matching circuit, as well as a dynamic range control, embedded in the DSP. The DAC is not that big, about 1/2 rack wide, but the feature set and connections do not feel cramped. A headphone jack and a dual-function volume control/menu operation knob and an OLED display inhabit the front panel, no other controls needed.

I/O galore including HDMI


  The rear panel includes the aforementioned SPDIF coax I/O, TOSLink I/O, HDMI 1.3 I/O, analog RCA I/O, balanced XLR analog output and a USB 2.0 Type-B connector input. The units runs on a 5V 300mA outboard power supply. The power switch is located on the top left front.
  Spec-wise, the factory numbers show a 109 dB S/N ratio (107 dB a-weighted); the other numbers, such as frequency response, crosstalk, distortion are good as well, though the frequency response is only listed to 20 kHz — even though it is wider for frequencies above 44.1 kHz.

All this and A/D too
  Although the HDACC is a first-rate DAC with lots of atypical DAC features, such as the HDMI conduit, the inclusion of an onboard A/D converter intrigued me. Consumer A/D-D/A combos are quite rare — more typical in pro and musician configurations. They are mostly used in USB-interface boxes for recording to the computer. The HDACC configuration gives you the versatility to use the A/D to dub LPs, or other media you own, or use it as a computer interface via the optical port. Though the A/D level is fixed and operates natively at 24/192, you can use the sample rate converter to set an alternative frequency: 44.1 kHz to 176 kHz. Because of the good quality converters and its price, I can see pros and consumers using this feature — not to mention all the I/O options.
  Although there is just the one control, the HDACC is simple to operate. Just push the volume button, select the menu you want and push the button to make your selections for input, sample rate, headphone impedance, etc. The display includes sample rate, volume level, selected input; no digital bit status, however, my only negative in the entire review.
  As enamored as I am of the multiple I/O and onboard A/D, I don’t want to lose sight of the rare DAC HDMI input feature. The HDACC is one of the few out there that even have HDMI. Essence President Bob Rapoport said the HDMI input opens up the separate DAC users to Blu-ray audio, which includes hi-res concerts and pre-recorded music discs from labels such as AIX.
  The Essence HDACC quickly became a favorite all-in-one, do-it-all, bang-for-the buck digital converter/HP amp. Its got that rare DAC HDMI input, and I found numerous uses for the HDACC with my laptop as a standalone DAC and A/D.

  The HDACC offers the HDMI “handshake protocol” that allows Blu-ray audio players to transmit their full fidelity audio out the digital conduit. The two-channel audio is broken out via Essence HDMI de-embedder. Thus, you can play the separate two-channel soundtracks from Blu-ray concerts in full res, or even listen to the L/R channels of DTS Master HD, Dolby TrueHD or linear PCM multichannel soundtracks. Often, BD concerts or prerecorded 5.1 lossless soundtracks put the discrete stereo in the L/R channels.
  The Essence DAC not only allows you to listen to the Blu-ray player HDMI output, but the HDACC elaborate routing options allow you to feed the HDMI input audio to another DAC at the same time, through the SPDIF or TOSLink, or both outputs at the same time. Feed two DACS if you want.

The audition
  I put the HDACC through several months of testing and found it so useful I was hesitant to give it back. First, I used it as BD/universal player DAC. First up, I hooked it to my Oppo BDP-95 via a WireWorldStarlight HDMI cable and played my Blu-ray copy of The WhoLive At The Isle of Wight 1970 concert film. The 16-bit/48 kHz sample rate discrete stereo soundtrack sounded pretty good. But when I selected the DTS Master HD 5.1, I got to hear the 24/96 L-R channels, essential the stereo mix in higher resolution; it was awesome, smoother and more open. It did the same with my Woodstock blu-ray.
  Another Blu-ray sampled through the HDACC was the Celine Dion -New Day Concert. The Dolby TrueHD multichannel is phenomenal, but through the HDACC, I was damn impressed with the 24/96 LPCM stereo presentation. The ESS Sabre DAC-equipped HDACC has that signature smoothness of the ESS chip with abundant detail and good width and depth in the stereo presentation. My Benchmark DAC2-D$1,799 and Mytek Digital Stereo 192-DSD, $1,500 had a bit more dimension and sparkle with this recording (thanks to the HDACC’s ability to connect to them via the SPDIF outputs to set up a comparison), but not as much as the price difference might make you think. The HDACC’s sonic character was quite good through both the headphone amp and the line out, especially the XLR analog outputs.
  The HDACC headphone amp could drive the AKG-K702 and Oppo PM-1 planar magnetic headphones with no problems when using the low impedance HP settings available in the HDACC.
  I played numerous HD Tracks and my own hi-res recordings of jazz and acoustic guitar from the Macbook Pro using Audirvana. I was quite content with the HDACC as my computer DAC during its trial with Everything Audio Network. I used it for multiple audio tasks for my Mac audio workstation, editing and processing hi-res stereo tracks. The unit fit perfectly next to the Macbook Pro, tethered to it via the USB cable.
  The HDACC also was an ideal mate for my Dell Venue 8 and the highly capable, hi-res Android software player, USB Audio Player Pro. With that setup, I used the Shure SRH1840 reference headphones. I played dozens of 24-bit tracks through the duo, without any problems or glitches. The HDACC lacks 352.8 kHz and 384 kHz sample rate decoding, but the USB Audio Player Pro program detects a DAC’s maximum sample rate and down samples to that rate. Thus, my 2L DXD (24/352) classical tracks and my own home-brew 24/384 guitar recordings were played back at 24/192, but they still sounded quite good through the Essence.

And recording, too...
  To test the HDACC’s A/D converter, I hooked up my Mackie 1402 mixer using two Audix SCX-25 microphones to record a Martin acoustic guitar. The mixer's tape outputs were connected to the analog inputs of the HDACC. Since the HDACC does not have USB output, I connected the TOSLink output of the HDACC to the TOSLink input of the Macbook Pro. I selected the digital input in the Audio settings, and commenced recording with Bias Peak recording/editing program, a now defunct software package that is still better than 99 percent of the two-track software editors on the market today.
 Although the HDACC is a first-rate DAC with lots of a atypical DAC features, such as the HDMI conduit, the inclusion of an onboard A/D converter intrigued me. Consumer A/D-D/A combos are quite rare.

  Since the A/D has a fixed level, I controlled the level with the analog mixer control and Peak’s digital input control. The DAC playback revealed a detailed, open smooth stereo guitar recording. Not quite as much detail as my $1,800 Benchmark ADC-1, but the Essence HDACC’s A/D capability is as good as numerous pro interfaces I have used — some much more money.

Dub your records
  For all you vinyl fans, the HDACC’s A/D features makes an ideal conduit for dubbing your records. I connected my Clear Audio turntable/Rogue Audio Model 99 Magnum’s phono preamp output to the HDACC’s RCA inputs and dubbed a copy of my Wes MontgomeryFull House audiophile LP using the Macbook Pro and freeware Audacity record/edit two track program, set at 24/192. I then played the recording back through the HDACC. The iconic jazz guitar live album from the early ‘60s was now preserved and able to be played back as many times as I desire without any record wear.
  As you can tell from this review, I really love the HDACC and its versatility. I used it as a multiple digital output router while A/B’ing two other DACs. I fed the HDMI output of the Oppo BDP-95 to the HDACC’s HDMI input, then connected the TOSLink output to one DAC and the SPDIF to the other DAC. With both DAC’s analog outputs level matched, I hooked their outputs to my Coda preamp, which was linked to a Bryston BHA-1 headphone amp. With the fast, source-switching Coda and its remote, I could A/B the DACs receiving the same signal from the HDACC. Pretty slick.
The HDACC configuration gives you the versatility to use the A/D to dub LPs, or other media you own, or use it as a computer interface via the optical port. Or connect to another outboard device via the TOSLink or SPDIF RCA.

  I also used the HDACC A/D to run a back-up recorder in the workstation. As I recorded the main audio (24/96) into the computer via the HDACC A/D through the Mac’s optical input, I routed the HDACC’s SPDIF RCA output to myTASCAM DR-100 Mark II’s portable digital recorder’s digital coax input. With the digital-sync, I was recording music onto the Mac and, thanks to the HDACC, I made a simultaneous backup recording on the TASCAM portable. Fantastic. Plus, the HDACC D/A was also my live-monitor DAC.
  With all you get for $699 retail, no one can really complain about the Essence HDACC. It would be nice to have a level meter meter and adjustable gain for the A/D — and a USB output; a bit status indicator perhaps? But this box is so well priced and capable, I really can’t get too upset over these omissions.

The verdict
  The Essence HDACC quickly became a favorite all-in-one, do-it-all, bang-for-the-buck digital converter/HP amp. Its got that rare DAC HDMI input, and I found numerous uses for the HDACC with my laptop as a standalone DAC and A/D, and as a digital distribution device. And it only costs $699 retail. This box really shines. From hi-res listening to archiving vinyl, to computer recording my guitars in hi-res, and listening to tunes on the go. I could not be more pleased. For $699, you could justify HDACC just for its HDMI input rarity; it is one the few DACs that utilizes HDMI input for audio use with Blu-ray players and computers that are equipped with the popular interface.
  No, it will not best the top-tier DACs in ultimate audio quality, but the sonic character is ESS chip smooth — with nice detail and the feature set is so deep that nothing touches it at 2X-3X the price. Of course, it gets the Everything Audio NetworkStellar Sound Award. And I plan to have one permanently in my arsenal of digital converters.




   John Gatski is publisher/owner of the Everything Audio NetworkArticles on this site are the copyright of the ©Everything Audio NetworkAny unauthorized use, via print or Internet, without written permission is prohibited.




Personal Audio Review!Hi-FiMAN HM-802High-Res Portable Player:"A Cut Above The Competition"

$
0
0
Hi-FiMAN HM-802
©Everything Audio Network


Brevis...
Price: starts at $699
Likes: high-end sonics, balanced output
Dislikes: no included digital output cable
Wow Factor: lots of buttons, lots of sound
More info: Hi-FiMAN HM-802


by John Gatski
  It’s a wonderful time to be a high-resolution music listener these days. We have all manner of DACS, streamers, players for the audiophile setups, as well as the portable market. Hi-FiMAN manufactures the high-end side of portable player/headphone amps, and several models have received critical acclaim from end users over the past three years.
  One of my favorite Hi-FiMAN hi-res players is the Wolfson-DAC chip (WM8740)-based HM-802. The HM-802, priced at $699, is an SD-card storage player (128 GB max.) that features up to 24-bit/192 sample rate PCM (including FLAC), and 2.8 MHz/5.6 MHz DSD playback. It also decodes the convenience audio formats, such as MP3, AAC, etc., ALAC, and AIFF, etc.
**The player sports a non-touch screen LCD and mechanical controls, as well as buttons to activate its various functions for playback and operational features.

Features
  The HM-802 player features a user-replaceable battery as well as upgradeable HP amp modules. The standard module features 105 dB S/N; an optional upgraded, balanced headphone amp module adds 5 dB in performance gain.
  Compared to the ultra-compact Astell and Kern portables, such as the popular AK-100, the HM-802 is a big hold for the hand, but its size allows for the larger replaceable battery and changeable HP amp modules, as well as several mechanical controls and connections. Battery life is listed at 11 hours of play. On my demo player, I always got at least eight hours at 24/192 or DSD quality.

HM-802 utilizes SDXC up to 128GB for audio storage

  The front-panel controls include a jog wheel/push button select for the menu items, play controls, and menu back. The in-case, integrated, knurled volume control is a throwback to Walkman-era devices, though the headphone jack is thoroughly modern with the ability to drive balanced headphones when selecting that option with the normal/balanced switch and using an 1/8th-inch HP adapter cable for the balanced ‘phones.
  There also is a multi-pin connector that hosts the AC adapter, which is the only way to charge the HiFiMAN, and the SPDIF digital input/analog output adapter. An optional dock allows full digital I/O, but I could not find out much about it from the HiFiMAN web site. I would buy such a dock since I often use portables as source players for separate DACs in my home system.
  The menu is easy to navigate via the jog wheel, and within each window, it is easy to enable the functions by pushing the “enter” button. However, it must be noted that all these functions are done with mechanical button pushes. In contrast, the Astell & Kern AK-100 portable operates with fewer buttons — since it uses a touch screen. However, I got used to the HM-802’s jog wheel-turning/button-pushing activity, and it always worked.
  Two really cool things the HiFiMAN offers are its user-replaceable battery, which means you can use it for a long time, and the upgradeable HP amp module. The balanced HP amp version ($979) nets about 5 dB better performance in S/N and dynamic range — 105 dB to 110 dB. My unit had the standard module. Thus, I don’t know if the upgraded circuit provides discernible audio improvements using balanced headphones. Good portables, like the original AK-100 we tested, measure in the 105 dB range. Not true 24-bit, but pretty darn good for a battery-powered self-contained hi-res player. A 110 dB S/N performance would be exemplary indeed. Nonetheless, the standard HP module HM-802 ain't no slouch.

As a hi-res music fanatic, I was quite impressed with the HiFIMAN HM-802’s audio playback performance. Its analog out via headphone, or line out, is sufficiently high-end to impress even the most finicky listener.

  Like the Astell and Kern players and many standalone DACs, the HiFiMAN has a welcome on-screen sample rate display. And as important, it also shows word-length (bit) of the music being played. The bit indicator also is handy for digital input connection info — if you connect it to an outboard device.

Ergonomics
  The HM-802 contains the aforementioned front panel jog wheel, menu button, back button, and play/pause, track forward button, and track backward button. The volume control is located at the near-top right of the unit. Other controls include a HD/Classic switch, which provides a treble roll-off in the Classic mode and is flat in its treble response in the HD mode. The unit also contains a Low Gain/High Gain switch. A balanced/normal switch engages the balanced circuitry when using a mini-jack-to-balanced adapter to connect balanced headphones.
  On the left side is the headphone mini-jack 1/8th-inch connector. The bottom-mounted, multi-pin connector provides conduits for the analog-out/digital-in connector cable that is included. The included cable has L/R unbalanced analog RCA outputs and SPDIF RCA inputs. The digital input is nice for connecting outboard players, such as CD players, or a universal player. However, you need am optional connection “base” to get digital output, which was not in my HM-802 kit.
  The HM-802 can only be charged by the included charger, which also connects to the bottom multi-pin connector. The portable cannot be charged by the USB cable, which only allows you to move audio files to and from the unit.
**Operationally, you access the HM-802 menu windows by turning the jog wheel and then pushing the enter button. The menu items are: Now Playing, Favorite, SD Card, Artist, Album, Genre, All Songs and Settings. The settings menu includes Repeat, Shuffle, Backlight, Playback Resume, Sleep, Brightness, Cue support, Language selection, SPDIF-In activate/deactivate, Media Database update and Reset settings.
  The battery is easy to remove when it comes to time to replace it. The HP amp module is user replaceable as well, located under the battery. The unit comes with a paper manual, the charging dock, and the digital in/analog out dock.

The audition
  Although the HM-802 is kind of old school in its appearance and multiple-switch approach to operation, its performance is outstanding. I loaded numerous hi-res tracks from HD Tracks and numerous tracks of my own recordings of jazz guitar, acoustic guitar and DSD piano, the latter recorded by Tom Jung of DMP and Sound 80 fame.
  Through my AKG K702, Shure SRH1840 and Oppo PM-1/PM-2 planar magnetic headphones I found the HiFiMAN’s audio performance deliciously listenable. The Wolfson DAC/ HP amp combo relays a detailed, wide, open soundstage, yet is smooth as butter with that desirable analog tape-like transient response.
  On a 24/192 dub of Bob Dylan “What’s A Sweetheart Like You” track from the Infidels SACD, the multiple layers of electric and acoustic guitar tracks are clearly heard, similar to my high-end standalone DAC/HP combos. Yet there was no hint of harshness.
  On a 24-bit download of the Commodores“Sail On,” the detailed, multitrack mix of acoustic and electric guitars, pedal steel guitar, horns and percussion impressed me with its depth in revealing all these distinct audio layers. The HM-802 is truly high-end in its audio delivery.

  Through my AKG K702s, Shure SRH-1840 and Oppo PM-1/PM-2 planar magnetic headphones I found the HiFiMAN’s audio performance deliciously listenable. The Wolfson DAC/ HP amp combo relays a detailed, wide, open soundstage, yet is smooth as butter with that desirable analog tape-like transient response.

  The HM-802’s smooth factor was particularly noticeable on the Jason Mraz track “I Won’t Give Up” (from the Love is a Four Letter Word album). This nice-sounding, 24/96 pop hit starts out soft and acoustic, but gets really loud in the chorus, as the level peaks at digital 0. On lesser DACs, the loud parts can be a bit hard sounding, but on a good DAC the peaks are softer, easier to listen to. The HiFiMAN handled the tracks without that hardness in the loud parts of the song. Much easier on the ears. The AK-100 playback has a little more edge on that track.
  The HM-802’s playback is equally at home on jazz, classical and acoustic as well. On a direct-to-DXD (24/352) recording that I made of a Taylor dreadnaught guitar, sample rate converted to 192 kHz sample rate and transferred to the HM-802, the intricate, flat-picked harmonics and the wide sense of space of the mic placement clearly came through the AKG K702 and HM-802 combo. It sounded ultra-clean and detailed through the Shure SRH1840 as well.

The HM-802/Oppo PM-2 Planar HPs make a great sonic combo

  And a 24/88 Mahler Symphony No. 6 performance also revealed the ample dynamic range, and low-level detail, low noise floor of the HiFiMAN DAC/HP amp. And there was plenty of gain in the high-gain setting to drive the low impedance AKGs — even during the symphony’s more quiet parts.
  The HM-802 also worked with other headphones including the Shure SRH1840s, and the smooth lush, tone-inducing Oppo PM-1 planar magnetic headphone. I also used the player a lot with the Sony MDR-7510, a budget, pro headphone that is fairly neutral in its presentation. I was quite pleased with that combo.
  Compared to the original Astell & Kern AK-100 that used a Wolfson DAC, the HM-802 is slightly richer, smoother sounding and a bit wider in its soundstage, but there are times the punchiness of the A&K’s audio playback comes in handy. I do prefer the simplicity of the A&K’s touch screen operation for track operation, versus the multiple button/jog wheel approach of the HM-802. But at the end of the day, the HiFiMAN’s functions are easy to master and it offers a gorgeous sound signature.
  My only real negative is the lack of digital output from the included connector cable. You need the optional docking “base” and another cable to get the full digital SPDIF output capability.

The verdict
  As a hi-res music fanatic, with access to numerous high-end DACS, headphone amps and other various playback methods, I was quite impressed with the HiFIMAN HM-802’s audio playback performance. Its analog out via headphone, or line out, is sufficiently high-end to impress even the most finicky listener. At $699, it is a good buy. The great sound, replaceable battery and excellent battery life put me firmly in its camp. If it had a standard digital output and USB cable charging, its operation capability would be perfect in my book.
  Overall, the HM-802 gets an Everything Audio NetworkStellar Sound Award and an audition recommendation from me to those who want hi-res music playback in a small form factor.
   John Gatski is publisher/owner of the Everything Audio NetworkArticles on this site are the copyright of the Everything Audio Network©Any unauthorized use, via print or Internet, without written permission is prohibited.


Home Recording Review!TASCAM UH-7000 Stereo USB Interface:"A High-End Quality/Bargain-PricedMicrophone Preamp/Line, A/D-D/A

$
0
0
Brevis...
Price: $799 retail/$399 street
Likes: excellent mic pres, A/D-D/A
Dislikes: no onboard effects at 192K
Wow Factor: separates quality in USB box
More info:  TASCAM UH-7000

by Dr. Frederick J. Bashour
  Call it déjà-vu, call it coming full circle, but whatever you call it, I have had this nostalgic feeling the entire time I’ve been using this new TASCAM UH-7000 computer recording interface. My first serious audio tape recorder, the TEAC A-7030 (analog, of course), was purchased in 1970 for the huge sum of $800, a lot of cash for a first year Yale graduate student. I remember picking it up in a huge carton at a Bradley Airport loading dock — on the way to a gig; it was my first (of several) stereo, two-track ¼-inch TEAC 7030s. In 1970, TEAC had yet to branch off TASCAM for pro audio sales, but I find it fascinating that the old and the new have 7000-series numbers.
  Just as my vintage stereo TEAC A-7030 recorder (which still runs just fine) consisted of two parts—the tape transport and the tape electronics — today’s digital audio era still employs the same stereo recorder concept. The only difference is that today’s digital equivalent of the old analog “tape transport” is now the home computer, which has become the most significant part of an audio-recording system. As a result, numerous “interfaces” have come along over the last 10 years, offering a plethora of audio features and connectivity to make the computer pro audio’s most effective recording tool.

Features
  The USB-connector based TASCAM UH-7000, priced at an amazing $599 retail ($399 street price) is a high-quality, 4-input/4-output computer audio interface with phantom-powered, stereo microphone preamps, and similar converter technology as in the highly acclaimed standalone TASCAM DA-3000 hi-resolution recorder (minus DSD): the Burr-Brown PCM4202 A/D converter and Burr-Brown, PCM1795 DAC converter. The UH-7000 USB interface is very well made, excellent sounding, fairly-priced, and made with an industrial design quite a bit different from similar audio gadgets on the market.

 With just a pair of good microphones connected to the UH-7000’s inputs, a modern personal computer and a stereo recording app, such as the freeware Audacity, anyone can make “professional quality” stereo recordings.

  So why is it different from other “USB Interfaces?” First, TEAC has been making audio recorders for a very long time and, over all those years, has developed a strong, coherent company philosophy about audio design and industrial design. It is clear that the good engineering practices demonstrated in their audio designs are reflected in their overall industrial design. Secondly, this is a stereo interface, a very full-featured stereo interface and not a multi-channel unit. There are plenty of multi-channel interfaces there on the market, trying to squeeze multiple inputs and outputs into a single rack-sized chassis.
  The third differentiation is that the UH-7000 can also be used as a standalone mic preamp and/or analog-to-digital converter (with AES-EBU digital outputs), and as a monitor DAC. For this reviewer, the fact that the TASCAM UH-7000 can add two, very high-quality channels — all the way from microphone to digital output — to any DAW, is huge!
  And fourth, because it also has an AES/EBU digital input, when you connect the TASCAM to a computer via USB (i.e., used as a standard USB audio interface), it can mix two stereo pairs — the two microphone channels and the two line channels — into the AES/EBU digital input stream, as well as locking its clock to any incoming digital stream’s clock, since it lacks true word clock I/O.

Compact form factor
  The TASCAM UH-7000 is in the half-rack size form factor, half of a standard 3.5” (two-rack spaces tall) unit, but as supplied for review, was presented in a finished enclosure, with very thick metal end panels. Its front panel is dominated by two large knobs, which set mic (or line) input level — very precisely, over about a 40 dB range — and two LED bar graph level meters.
Plenty of rear-panel connection options 

  On the left is the (smart) power knob and a ¼-inch headphone jack, powered by the line-output driver, and also controlled by a volume knob of its own over on the right. On the right side of the front panel, one also finds two “smart” push buttons, which call up the mixer panel when the UH-7000 is connected to a computer and to activate the “link-line” function. When pushed simultaneously, they activate the 48V DC phantom power microphone circuit. Above these are five status LEDS, showing sample rate (from 44.1 kHz to 192 kHz), and whether the unit is locked to its AES/EBU digital input.
  The rear panel demonstrates exactly how “complete” a stereo converter the TASCAM UH-7000 is. Besides pairs of XLR jacks for balanced analog mic inputs and line outputs, there are also a pair of ¼-inch TRS jacks, for balanced analog line input, a pair of male and female XLRs for AES/EBU digital I/O, the requisite USB 2.0 port and an IEC connector for 100-240V AC power.

In the studio
  When the UH-7000 arrived at Studio Dufay, I was scheduled to record myself — while reminiscing about one of my previous lives as a fledgling music theorist in the late 1970s. The president of the Society of Music Theory (SMT) had just called. Since I had actually read a scholarly paper at the very conference in which the Society was originally formed, he wanted my audio file to post on the SMT website. So I figured this would be a perfect first test for the UH-7000.
  I connected one of my Neumann M 249s to the TASCAM channel 1 input, and connected the digital output to one of the sixteen digital inputs of the RME HDSPe AES PCIe sound card, which forms the digital interface to my Mac Pro recording/editing workstation.
  I was counting on using the TASCAM in standalone mode. However, I quickly learned, by glancing over the well-written 32-page manual, that if one doesn’t want to accept the unit’s defaults (which includes a sample rate of 44.1 kHz and I wanted 96 kHz), one must first connect it “normally” to a computer via USB, and then adjust the settings. So that’s why the manual begins with “installing the driver!”
  I then took a detour from my spoken-word project, and connected the UH-7000 to my Mac Pro, downloaded and installed the appropriate driver and, presto, it became the Mac’s audio interface to the rest of the world. I had no problems during set up, and everything worked as described in the manual. The TASCAM driver appeared in Mac’s Audio MIDI Setup, and, once properly selected, all was good to go.

  The A/D-D/A converter circuitry in the UH-7000 uses the latest Burr-Brown delta-sigma chips, and even its internal clock has a TCXO with 1-ppm precision. There are also high-grade audio parts in the D/A path, including film resistors. Claimed S/N specs for A/D and D/A are in excess of 120 dB.

  I pressed “mixer” on its front panel, and in about a second, the mixer-panel screen appeared on my monitor. The mixer panel has three tabbed pages — Interface, Mixer, and Effects. By selecting “Interface,” I was able to change the sample rate to my required 96 kHz, and confirm that the clock setting was “automatic.”
  To enable the standalone mode to work properly, the UH-7000 will save the current setting’s parameters to its internal memory; other settings can be saved to the computer, but when disconnected from a computer, the TASCAM will “remember” only its last setting.
  As previously stated, there is no word clock I/O, so one way to lock the TASCAM, in standalone mode, to my RME/Merging Technologies Pyramix DAW system was to connect one of its 16-digital outputs (with no data, i.e., its volume level turned all the way down) to the UH-7000’s digital input. This trick works with any DAW, but if you also have a studio clock device (such as my Apogee Big Ben, which has a separate AES3 output) one can also use that clock, which is what I did.

The virtual mixer
  There are nineteen parameters, adjustable on the Mixer page, which are also saved for use in standalone mode. I’ll discuss some of them later in this article, when I return to the unit’s use as an USB interface. But first, I wanted to use it as an “auxiliary” stereo pair of channels, feeding, digitally, into my studio’s own DAW and interface setup.
  Once I had it set the way I wanted, I disconnected it from the Mac Pro, and reconnected it to the AES/EBU digital input from my main DAW, and the AES3 output from Big Ben, as previously described. I was gratified to see both the TASCAM’s left meter, and appropriate meters in my Merging Technologies Pyramix software showing signal presence when I spoke into the microphone.
  Because I had its digital input connected, the TASCAM had locked to my system clock, and the appropriate LED on the front panel was lit. Furthermore, according to the manual, its digital output is always active, so whatever appears at the analog outputs (and, paralleled, to the headphone jack) also appears at its AES/EBU XLR as well. It’s assignable as well. Very cool.
Effective reverb and EQ effects

  I recorded my Music Theory project in 24/96 PCM and then played it all back. The first thing I noticed was how good I sounded! Granted, a vintage 249 microphone makes most everything sound big and warm, but I know well how a “cheap” preamp can diminish that quality. My 249, however, really liked the UH-7000.
  The TASCAM’s input impedance is spec’d at 2.2 kHz, a figure sufficiently high to please most mics — except for a few ribbons. The second thing I noticed was that, although the level pots appeared to be accurately calibrated over their entire range, that range was not extreme. The input-level pots are calibrated from 62 down to 22, and since they’re just standard potentiometers, they travel smoothly through their range.
  In addition to that spoken word project I captured with the UH-7000, I substituted these preamps for other pairs of mic preamps in every classical music recording session scheduled during the audition period. Thus, I was able to hear how they sounded with a wide range of sources. I’ll simply generalize and state that the UH-7000’s mic preamps sound very clean and clear, with a hint of dryness. In other words, along the continuum from euphonically colored and “tubey” to the proverbial, completely neutral “straight wire with gain,” the TASCAM is definitely in the latter camp. But it also has a naturalness and “ease” to its sound, which has a lot more in common with the best of the neutral, standalone preamps (like Crane Song, Millennia Media, Grace, AEA, etc.) than with what I would have expected from a sub-$600, all-in-one, computer interface.

Low-noise preamps
  Also, like those expensive, solid-state preamps, the UH-7000 is quiet. To find out how quiet — to give it the best noise vs. gain test I could think of, I connected a “normal” stereo, small ribbon microphone. I used an un-modified “Stellar RM7,” which is an unbelievably inexpensive Chinese copy of the vintage B&O stereo mic I owned back in 1976. And to make the test even more stringent, I connected my “first generation” AKG K-240 headphones to the TASCAM’s headphone jack.
  The AKG phones are the “quietest” headphones I own — which means that their relatively high impedance, compared with low-impedance ‘phones like the Sony MDR-V6, requires more drive from a headphone output circuit to produce the same SPL. So this was a “worst case” test for the UH-7000 — the lowest output microphone I owned, coupled with the most “inefficient” headphone I own.
  And what did I hear? Big, fat, happy, loud, ribbon mic sound, that’s what! Speaking in a normal tone of voice, just a few inches away from the mic, with the TASCAM gain all the way up, and the headphone level also turned all the way up, the sound was just about as loud as I could stand, and right below the point where the whole setup would be ready to start feeding back through my open AKG HPs.
  As for the preamp noise, there was a tiny bit of hiss, but it was much lower in level than the ambient noise from my control room. Just by backing off the gain a bit, below “62” to the “60” position, the hiss disappeared completely; I estimate the gain went down only about 4-5 dB.

Big knobs, easy to use
  I really liked the UH-7000’s “big knobs” for adjusting the channel’s input levels. On cheap interfaces and mixers, the “trim” controls on their mic preamps seem to have 80 percent of their gain in the last tiny bit of their clockwise travel. With the UH-7000, not only is this “pronounced gain” very, very reduced, but the fact that the level doesn’t go down to 0 when one turns the pot all the way down (rather it goes to a lower level, indicated on the big knob as “22,”) makes this unit one of the easiest preamps to adjust mic levels that I have ever used. And I have turned a lot of gain knobs in my fifty years plus in the studio.
  During the review period I was not sure that the numbers engraved around the big knobs (22 to 62) actually are pretty close to the true gain available from the preamps. Bear in mind, however, that the UH-7000 mic preamps have no direct analog output — at +4 dBm or at any other standard level. The signal either goes through A/D and out the AES/EBU (and USB) digital output, or through the D/A analog output for monitoring.

Along the continuum from euphonically colored and “tubey” to the proverbial, completely neutral “straight wire with gain,” the TASCAM mic preamps are definitely in the latter camp. But the UH-7000 also has a naturalness and “ease” to its sound, which has a lot more in common with the best of the neutral, standalone preamps.

  According to TASCAM design team comments made during the fact check of this review, engineers said to not “rely on the knob dB settings to set up a calibrated input (e.g. SMAART). The UH-7000 Mic Pre circuitry uses the front panel gain knob in a fairly unique manner (instrumentation amp type) that gives it excellent low noise characteristics, but puts it at the mercy of the potentiometer's linearity. We worked with the pot manufacturer to create an improved linear curve, but there is a limit to what is possible with this design. (The only way to improve on this design is to do a stepped pot with calibrated resistors)”
  A precise integer value (in -dBFS) will influence its perceived gain spec, which is probably the reason TASCAM doesn’t advertise a figure such as “mic preamp gain: 65 dB” (or whatever it is.) Space does not permit an explanation of the various digital level specs (-18 dBfs, -12 dBfs, etc.), and how they would influence the perceived gain in a unit with only a digital output, such as this.
  So far, I’ve been discussing how I used the TASCAM UH-7000 as (what I now know, as an extremely high quality) combination mic preamp/A-D converter, used as “an extra pair of mic channels into my DAW.” After all, TASCAM calls this gadget a “Mic Preamp/USB Interface.” Actually, though, it isn’t quite “just” a mic preamp, since it has no direct analog output! The only way to hear the mic preamp is through the A/D converter and the D/A circuitry (or another connected D/A), but the two edges of that sword are that this “feature” enables the unit to be used precisely as that extra pair of mic channels while, at the same time, putting great pressure on its A/D converter to preserve all the delicate audio nuances present at the analog output of the preamp circuit.
  TASCAM has been designing its converters for quite a while, and while not generally regarded as the ne plus ultra of audiophilia, to me they have a solid, full-bodied sound, and as reliable as the rest of their design. The A/D-D/A converter circuitry in the UH-7000 uses the latest Burr-Brown delta-sigma chips, and even its internal clock has a TCXO with 1-ppm precision. There are also high-grade audio parts in the D/A path, including film resistors. Claimed S/N specs for A/D and D/A are in excess of 120 dB.

The mixer interface
  Once I selected this interface for sound input and output in Audio MIDI Setup, we are now into the second (and more common use) for the UH-7000 — that is, as a stereo USB interface. And what a stereo interface it is!
  I used Mac OS 10.9.5 (Mavericks) on my Mac Pro for all my tests of TASCAM’s “Mixer” software application, which launched quickly and worked flawlessly. Although TASCAM specifies that any Mac OS from 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard) onward will work with the UH-7000, I was not able to install the .dmg file on either of my 10.6.8 Intel Macs; the installation process would hang and not complete.

  Pushing the tiny “Mixer” button on the UH-7000’s front panel engages the Mixer program and a large mixer appears on your computer monitor. The .pdf manual explains the three available windows in detail, but here I’ll just point out that the UH-7000 can be set into one of two “mixer modes”: Multitrack or Stereo Mix, and its features are slightly different in each of the two modes.
  The default multitrack mode is for “normal” DAW work, and works by allowing the TASCAM’s four input channels (two mic/line, and two digital) to be recorded separately, and mixed with audio coming “back” from the computer; all as separate channels. In Stereo Mix mode, all the audio I just mentioned is mixed to stereo, and output through every way the unit makes output, including USB, digital, analog line and headphone. TASCAM advertises this mode as being perfect for preparing live Internet broadcasts.
  The TASCAM’s mixer does most of the things one would expect from a software mixer. Although, since the UH-7000 is only a 4-in/4-out USB interface, the mixer does not have rows upon rows of virtual faders! In fact — and, perhaps because of this fact — everything on this mixer seems huge. Not just the faders, but when one gets to the effects, the windows look positively huge, as if they were made for the “large print” demographic!

Effects package
  The first thing one must know about the effects built into the UH-7000’s software mixer is that there is limited, finite DSP, which must be shared. At the lowest sample rates, 44.1 kHz and 48 kHz, one can have only one effect from column A (compressor, noise suppressor, de-esser, exciter, EQ, limiter and low-cut filter) and one from column B (reverb appears to be the only effect in this “send effect” category). At the middle sample rates (88.2 and 96 kHz), one must choose between the effect from column A (and you can’t even have the limiter and the low-cut filter together), and reverb. At 176.4 kHz and 192 kHz, no effects are possible.
  I did all my tests at 96 kHz, and auditioned each of the “plug-ins.” The reverb and EQ are the best of the lot, which is a good thing, since, together, they constitute the “meat and potatoes” of an audio engineer’s tool kit. The reverb has four presets (room, live, studio, and plate), with default reverb time ranging from 2.4 sec. — down to below 1sec.

  In fact, the only adjustments in the reverb’s large window are those for pre-delay and reverb time. The three-band “parametric” equalizer is, in fact, only “semi-parametric,” since only the mid-band has a Q-adjustment knob. Thus, there are only seven adjustments on the EQ, but it sounds good, and the large display accurately represents the EQ curve, resulting from adjusting those seven knobs!
  There are only minimal adjustments on any of the effects, but even the extremely stripped-down de-esser works as advertised. The remainder of the mixer window’s three-screen pages consists of the adjustments for each of its approximately twenty parameters, with an opportunity to save them to hard disk (and reload them, as appropriate, of course).
  And now, returning full circle to our initial discussion of standalone mode, it is also important to carefully adjust all those parameters because, when the UH-7000 is powered up without a computer connected, it remembers each and every one of them in the last state in which it was (automatically) saved to its internal memory when last shut down.

The verdict
  In summary, the TASCAM UH-7000 is a worthy digital audio successor to the all those TEAC 15-ips reel-to-reel analog tape recorders that graced my 1970s and 1980s studios. With just a pair of good microphones connected to the UH-7000’s inputs, a modern personal computer and a stereo recording app, such as the freeware Audacity, anyone can make “professional quality” stereo recordings.
  And I can’t emphasize enough how good the mic preamps are; they are “high quality” — better than preamps and converters in many of the popular, multi-channel USB interfaces and, on the other end, certainly good enough to fit in with the some of the more expensive equipment available. We also recommend the UH-7000 for the Everything Audio Network Stellar Sound Award, based on its function, audio quality and pricing.
  Based on my very positive experience with the TASCAM UH-7000 — and my ultimate confidence in it being a potential digital audio workhorse for any class of studio — here’s my challenge to those just getting into professional recording. Since I was able to use my first TEAC A-7030, between 1970-1973, to record master tapes for what became my first four commercial classical label album credits as engineer, I challenge all you recording-studio types to be the first to begin your career with an analogous use of the TASCAM UH-7000. Its high quality and ease of use will certainly make your recording life easier, but what you choose to do with it is up to you. Good luck!

  Dr. Fred Bashour has been a classical recording engineer for the past 45 years, with recordings released on over twenty labels, including Musical Heritage Society, Naxos and Dorian. His studio, Dufay Digital Music, is located in Western Massachusetts. He holds a Yale Ph.D. in Music Theory and is also an gigging keyboardist. He can be reached via the Everything Audio Network: everything.audio@verizon.net






Home Theater Review!Yamaha AVENTAGE MX-A500011-Channel Balanced Input Amplifier

$
0
0

"A genuine bargain for such great sound + 11-channels"

Brevis...
Price: $2,995 retail
Likes: 11 channels, fantastic fidelity
Dislikes: zilch, nada, zero complaints
Wow Factor: lots of channels, lots of sound
More info:  Yamaha MX-A5000

by John Gatski
  From pro audio to motorcycles and ATV's — as well as home audio video — the name Yamaha always means a high-caliber product — no matter what the niche. After hearing about the new AVENTAGE MX-A5000 11-channel home theater amp in 2013, I expected it to be top-notch multichannel amp. Almost every Yamaha pro audio/consumer audio product I have ever tested has been aces. And that is exactly what I found during my test run with the MX-A5000— a dynamic, yet smooth, multichannel power house that is quite a bargain when considering how much you get for your $2,995.

Features
  The made-in-Asia MX-A5000 is a high-end multichannel amp that can continuously crank out more than 100 watts per channel in 5 or 7 channel modes, and I estimate as high as 80 continuous watts, across all 11 channels, if so desired. Yamaha’s two-channel rating is 170 wpc at .9% distortion. At 150 wpc across two channels, the amp distortion falls to .06%. The listed signal-to-noise is 116 dB (@ less than 60 µV residual noise).
  The amp features 11 balanced XLR and 11 RCA inputs for flexible setups, such as Dolby Atmos speaker scenarios — as well as powering a home-theater setup and a couple of other room/zone speakers. The sheer number of speaker outputs also makes this amp a great choice for bi-amping speakers.

 In the context of high-end multichannel amps, I rank the Yamaha up near the top — especially with its price tag at under $3,000. There are some expensive multichannel separates that may eek out a bit more space in their presentation and higher-power levels. But even against those amps the MX-A5000 is an impressive amplifier, considering the price, for serious home theater/serious music listeners who have their systems in medium to large rooms.

 The key to the MX-A5000’s sonic signature is its current-feedback, three-stage Darlington bipolar output circuit, a massive power supply and 27,000μF custom block capacitors. This amp can deliver and hold current for deep bass and intense dynamic bursts of main channel audio and surround effects, as well as high-res multichannel music playback from Blu-rays or music-download sources, such as 2L.
  Yamaha likes to tout not only the electrical design, but also the amp’s physical construction. The amp includes a rigid housing for the internal parts and the chassis stiffness is enhanced by an H-shaped cross frame that boosts mechanical strength of the support structure. To further enhance resistance to airborne and room-to-rack vibrations, an installation A.R.T. (Anti-Resonance Technology) Wedge was installed in the center of the bottom cover, and a double bottom, consisting of vibration control plates made of 1.6 mm black steel. In order to support the heavy heat sinks and other electronic parts, the amp features a left-right independent construction strengthened by a rigid-frame structure. And the bottom frame further reduces the transmission of vibration produced by the large power supply transformer and heat sinks.
One brute of a power supply; check out those caps

  The MX-A5000 is designed as a high-end AVENTAGE line companion to the CX-A5000 multichannel preamp/processor, which was out of stock when we received our amp review sample. But the amp can work with any preamp/processor, or the pre outputs of a multichannel receiver.
  Being an amplifier, the MX-A5000 is a much more simple device to set up than the preamp in front of it. The front panel of the attractive power amp houses its power switch and Channel A/B speaker selector. Around back are the pairs of line inputs, via RCA unbalanced or XLR balanced, and the three-way speaker terminals which are arranged on each side of the amp.
  A 12V trigger also comes standard for those installers and do-it-yourselfers who take the sequential power-up route. There also is an auto-off switch that engages a self shut-off after eight hours, and there is a balanced/unbalanced selector for each channel.
  With so many speaker connectors and input connectors, the wiring looks a bit daunting at first, but once you settle on your particular configuration and have the cables in hand, attaching the conduits is a piece of cake. For my setup, I configured the MX-A5000 amp as a five channel amp for my main home cinema room. Left, right, center and two surrounds, using an AudioControl Maestro 3 multichannel preamp as the primary signal source and running balanced cables to the amp inputs.

  The Yamaha kicks butt with the Bruce Willis Live Free and Die Hard soundtrack; the opening shootout's spent shell casing effects rained down on me like a sonic cloudburst, and the intense explosions pushed up the SPL meter with no trace of sonic sludge. Clean, dynamic and open! That is what you want from AV amplification.

  With the sheer numbers of inputs and bi-amping capability, you can set up numerous speaker scenarios including running the home theater in 5.1, 7.1, 9.1 or up to the 11 full channels if so desired. You can also set up multichannel configurations as well as two room zones. With all its channels, it is also possible to bi-amp up to five pairs of speakers. Bi-amping can enhance clean signal amplification by allowing each driver to have its own amp connection.

The set up
  I installed the MX-A5000 in my home theater room. It was mated with my reference professional Westlake LC8.1 L-R speakers, Westlake LC2.65 center and NHT One surround speaker system. Bass duties were handled by my reference Paradigm Reference Studio Sub 15 subwoofer. I fed the amp line signals from either the AudioControl Maestro 3 or the AudioControl AVR-4 receiver’s preamp section. I also put in the bang-for-the buck Outlaw 975 pre/pro — a steal at $500!
  Just for comparison, I also enabled a BD player direct-to-amp playback system by routing five analog RCA outputs from my Oppo BDP-105 straight into the amp’s unbalanced inputs, playing lots of movies and hi-res surround music directly from the BD player
  On hand for amp comparison, I had a first generation five-channel AudioControl Pantages 80 wpc Class H amp, and two 1990s-era Carver home theater separates (a three- and a two-channel amp). Because the AudioControl AVR-4 receiver is as good as most separates, I also used it for comparison, as well as using its preamp section to link to the Yamaha.
The MX-A5000 has generous connection space

  Setting up an amp usually takes less time than setting up a pre/pro; you just need to connect the inputs and all the speaker cables. The amp weighs about 56 pounds, which is quite manageable compared to the high-end Pass amps I reviewed a few months ago (more than 300 pounds split among two separate chassis). Yamaha maximizes the rear-panel space pretty well with left speaker outputs on one side and right on the other. The inputs are mounted in the central portion of the back panel.
  I find it interesting that more and more amps, including the Yamaha, no longer have grounded AC receptacles and cables, opting for the two-pronged power cables. Nonetheless, an Essential Sound Products Essence II Reference power cord was connected to the amp during the review.
  For line level connection, I chose Wireworld’s superb, accurate-is-neutral, Eclipse7 balanced analog cables for preamp-to-amp connection, and Wireworld’s RCA cables for the direct Oppo BDP-105-as-preamp setup; Wireworld speaker cables also connected the speakers to the amplifier.
  To test the MX-A5000 as an audiophile caliber amp, I added a Resonessence Mirus high-end DAC for two channel playback up to 24/384, which I actually had one demo track at that high of a sample rate. I played hi-res music from a Dell Venue 8 as the source player (via USB Audio Player Pro) for the hi-res music, linked to the DAC and the DAC fed directly into two of the balanced inputs of the MX-A5000.
  I matched the speaker levels precisely using a professional AudioControl real-time analyzer/SPL meter, lab-grade mic, and the AudiControl Maestro pre/pro’s onboard test signal generator. I find that the cheap handheld meters don’t do a good job in accurately measuring the SPL level of low bass. Thus, the pro analyzer/SPL unit allows me to precisely match the speaker levels, which makes a big difference in clean multichannel performance.

The Audition
  First up, I played the animated movie BD of Meet The Robinsons. It has a linear PCM 24-bit/48 kHz 5.1 soundtrack and among the most open and dynamic BDs that I own. It has lots of steered surround effects, and open, boisterous music soundtracks that lesser amps and receiver amp sections strain to reproduce cleanly when you crank up volume.
  My reference AudioControl AVR-4 and a few other high-end receivers, as well as high-end Krell, Marantz and Classe amps can do this soundtrack justice at loud levels. The late 1990s Carvers I used for comparison are pretty good up to say around 87 dB continuous level, but when you push them to the lower-to-mid 90 db+ peaks, they start to sound strained.
  Strain is not a word you can associate with the Yamaha's sonic description. The MTR BD soundtrack’s sonic signature, like the AudioControl receiver’s, was big and imposing with great width and space spread among the tracks’ varying elements. Right off the bat, I could tell that the MX-A5000 had the capability to relay the massive dynamics of the linear PCM soundtrack.
  Strain is not a word you can associate with the Yamaha. The BD soundtrack’s sonic signature, like the AudioControl receiver’s, was big and imposing with a great width and space spread among the tracks’ varying elements. Right off the bat, I could tell that the MX-A5000 has the capability to relay the massive dynamics of the linear PCM soundtrack.

  Pushing into the mid-90 dB region, not a hint of harshness or stridency in the midrange or low treble. And its ability to handle the non-subwoofer bass was just as impressive — quick, taut and deep.
  Next up was the Live Free and Die Hard Blu-ray, the Bruce Willis action movie from 2007. The early action sequences have intense bursts of gun fire explosion, car chases, and a lot of added effects in the rear channels. Like the Meet The Robinsons, the soundtrack is quite dynamic, and its maximum peaks can punish you with sub-standard amplification. Cheap receivers and amps can’t cut it with this disc.
  The Yamaha kicks butt with the Bruce Willis flick soundtrack; the shell casing effects in the beginning shootout rained down on me like a sonic cloudburst, and the intense explosions pushed up the SPL meter with no trace of sonic sludge. Clean, dynamic and open! That is what you want from AV amplification.
  The AudioControl receiver and the Yamaha amp are similar in their presentations and smooth factor up to about 95 percent. The AudioControl is still slightly more audiophile in its sense of space and finesse with music soundtracks, but the Yamaha amp’s sheer extra horsepower may eek out a slight dB advantage in a really large room. Still you are comparing a receiver (though an expensive one) to a separate amp only unit; a high-end, separate, high-power amp ought to deliver high sound level with no problem.


Yamaha does not skimp on quality parts selection

  I switched to surround music listening with several AIX Record Blu-ray music discs played directly from the Oppo to the Yamaha, using the Oppo's digital volume control. Again, the Yamaha excelled at the nuances, the timbre of classical piano, and the well-recorded multichannel soundtrack enveloped me in its reassuring smoothness. Not tube amp smooth, but a natural, analog music instrument smoothness.
  I fired up the Dell Tablet and the Resonessence Mirus DAC, input directly into Yamaha amp and I played several hours of stereo, hi-res download music from HD Tracks. From the 24/96 reissue of Led Zeppelin III, I was impressed with the remaster’s expanded space of the guitar tracks and fullness of Robert Plant’s vocals. The Yamaha amplified the classic blues-folk rock cut, Gallows Pole in fine form — with Plant’s high-pitched velocity vocal. Jimmy Page’s acoustic guitar and banjo and John Bonham’s heavy drum sound is much better heard in this reissue. Listening to the cut through the MX-A5000 adds to the hi-res sonic experience. This is a very good hi-fi amp.
  To test the dynamics of acoustic guitar and ultra high-resolution recording and playback, I turned to my own 24-bit/384 acoustic guitar test cut that I made with a pair of high-end mics, and an Antelope Eclipse 24/384 A/D-to-computer recording setup. Recording myself on a Taylor 810 guitar in stereo, the two-minute, 30 second cut personifies the extra nuance and textured sonic space of high-res recording. Though not as expansive sounding through the Yamaha as it was through the $60,000 Pass Labs XS150 mono blocks tested earlier this year, my guitar snippet was not let down by the Yamaha amp. It still sounded fresh and extended — and it only costs $2,995!
 I also liked the sound of my Beatles 24-bit reissues played through the Yamaha. The stereo versions of the early albums are remarkably well recorded, and the hi-res transfers bring out that simple, yet full fidelity sound. Just listen to that snare from Ringo’s perfectly rendered "Act Naturally."

  I also liked the sound of my Beatles 24-bit reissues played through the Yamaha. The stereo versions of the early albums are remarkably well recorded, and the hi-res transfers bring out that simple, yet full-fidelity sound. Just listen to that snare from Ringo’s perfectly rendered drumming on "Act Naturally."
  All in all, the Yamaha MX-A5000 excels not only at playing your movie soundtracks, but also is a pretty darn good music amp. If you want it all in one amp, this is one to consider. I did not have any complaints with the Yamaha MX-A5000. Easy to setup, plenty of space for the speaker cables to co-exist with the input cables, and it has a 12V trigger for remote turn on. At 56 pounds, it is not light, but not a boat anchor either.

The verdict
  In the context of high-end multichannel amps, I rank the Yamaha up near the top — especially with its price tag at under $3,000. There are some expensive multichannel separates (Classe, Krell Mark Levinson) that may eek out a bit more space in their presentation and higher-power levels, but the MX-A5000 is an impressive amplifier for serious home theater/serious music listeners who have their systems in medium-to-large rooms. I expected nothing less from Yamaha, and they delivered An Everything Audio NetworkStellar Sound Award for sure.

John Gatski has been evaluating consumer, audiophile, home cinema and professional audio gear since 1992. In 1995, he created Pro Audio Review, and he has written for Audio, Laserviews, Enjoy The Music,The Audiophile Voice and High Performance Review. Everything Audio Network is based in Kensington, MDArticles on this site are the copyright of the ©Everything Audio Network. Any unauthorized use, via print or Internet, without written permission is prohibited. He can be reached via everything.audio@verizon.net








Audiophile Review!Parasound zdac v.2Stereo D/A Converter

$
0
0

Parasound zdac v.2 DAC
"Upgraded Headphone Amp Enhances The New Zdac"

Brevis...
Price: $549 retail
Likes: more HP oomph, first-rate build
Dislikes: give us 24/192 via USB please
Wow Factor: still way above its price

by John Gatski
 In 2013, I reviewed the Parasound zdac, a great value/performance 24/192 D/A that fit into numerous audio listening niches, including audiophile, home recording, and for use as a computer DAC (to 24/96). Never one to rest on its success, Parasound has made some key upgrades to the zdac, and made it better.
  Priced at $549, the zdac v.2 now offers front-panel quarter-inch and eight-inch headphone jack, separate line out and HP volume controls, digital audio connection to Lighting jack-equipped Apple devices (USB adapter required), increased headphone amp gain, fixed/variable line out switch and 12V input/output triggers.

Features
  The new zdac maintains its solid feature set of USB, Coax/TOSlink SPDIF digital inputs, plus XLR balanced and unbalanced analog RCA line outputs. The most audible improvements are increased headphone gain and the fixed variable line out switch for those who want a fixed level for routing the output audio to other preamps.
  The zdac v.2 maintains its computer compatibility with USB input, though it is still limited to 24/96 using the USB 1.0 protocol, which requires no computer/device drivers. However, most DACs use the USB 2.0 protocol, which requires specific drivers, but allow up to 24/192 and higher sample rates. Today, most DACs, even inexpensive ones, can decode up to 24/192 and higher sample rate audio; some as high as 24/384. I would like to see Parasound add sample rate decoding to at least 192 via USB to remain competitive. With the increase use of computers as primary hi-fi players, a DAC needs that high-sample rate compatibility.
  Nonetheless, you can still play 24/192 via the optical input from a Mac computer to a zdac v.2. On 2013 and newer Macbook Pro Retina laptops, the  Mac's optical digital audio output maximum sample rate has been increased from 96 kHz to 192 kHz, which means the zdac v.2 (and many other DACs) will natively play 192 kHz audio hi-res from those Macs  Older Intel Macs have the ability to play out to 96 kHz only. Those computers take the 24/192 and downsample to 96 kHz, which means the zdac v.2 can still play music from 192 kHz sources.


Plenty of connectivity, including balanced XLR out


  The zdac v.2 maintains its excellent sound quality by using the Analog Devices AD1853 24-bit/192 kHz digital-to-analog converter chip, the same chip used in the Benchmark DAC1 series. All digital input signals are re-clocked and up-sampled to 422 kHz for improved sonics and improved jitter reduction. The Analog Devices AD1895 sample rate converter chip is used for the up conversion.
  The zdac's high-current headphone amp is claimed to drive virtually any headphones from 32 to 600 ohms. Unlike many low-cost DACs, the zdac v.2 is designed with a high-quality, toroidal transformer in its power supply circuit, ensuring plenty of voltage and current to drive most any headphone and line devices. The zdac v.2 factory specs are quite good with a 110-dB signal-to-noise ratio, and low distortion throughout the audio band at the various sample rates. The analog outputs, via unbalanced or balanced, have plenty of oomph — with 2.1 volts and 4.2 volts respectively.
  The half-rack zdac form factor makes it easy to install in a rack or to carry around in your bag for use as a stereo-recording monitor DAC wherever you go. The unit weighs about 5 pounds. It is available in silver or black finish.

The setup
  As with most DACs that I test (and I test a lot of them), a DAC needs a good listen to establish a sonic benchmark. I linked the zdac v.2 to an Oppo BDP-95via SPDIF. For comparison, I had the original zdac, a Benchmark DAC2-D, and Mytek Stereo 192-DSD: much more expensive DACs, though with the similar form factor. I also listened to a couple of DACs closer to the price range of the zdac v.2: the  USB-connected Korg DS-DAC-100M ($350) and the USB/SPDIF Resonessence Concero-HP ($849); these two DACs do not have near the connectivity features and advanced analog circuit of the zdcac v.2  but do have good audio quality and compatibility with higher sample rate PCM and DSD.
  I know there are lower-cost DACs out there, but when you compare the build quality and parts selection and its well-above-its-price-range sound, the Parasound zdac v.2 is a steal at $549.

  For headphone amp comparisons, I listened to audio via the onboard headphone amps. For additional comparisons, I also routed the Parasound’s analog output to a Bryston BHA-1 HP amp/line out as well as to the analog input of the Oppo HA-1HP Amp/DAC.
  Headphones included AKG K702 Anniversary, Shure SRH1840, Oppo PM-1 planar magnetic and Sony MDR-7510 headphones. Wireworld digital cables were used throughout the system. Essential Sound Products Essence II Reference power cords connected the components to the AC.
  I also integrated the zdac v.2 into my high-end playback system, consisting of, at the time, Pass Labs XP-10 preamp, Pass Labs XS-150 mono block, Class A amplifiers and my MartinLogan Montis speakers.

The audition
  When I reviewed the original zdac in 2013, I raved about its sound quality, considering the price. In fact, when I took it to the Capital AudioFest that year and put it in our stack of DACs A-B listening sessions, most people were hard pressed to differentiate it from other DACs, including the more expensive ones, in the demo.
  For the most part, the zdac v.2 is sonically identical to the original, but with increased headphone amp gain. In fact, i did not need to turn the volume control knob nearly as far with the low-impedance AKG headphones as I did the original zdac.
  During my testing, I played dozens of hi-res tracks from different genres, including Classical, Jazz and Pop. As with the original zdac, the zdac v.2 is a detailed, revealing DAC that performs considerably above its price point. I have always liked the analytical character of the Analog Devices DAC chip (Benchmark used it in its DAC1 Series), and the zdac v.2 gives me that quality in spades. Tight bass, a generous soundstage and crisp transient response on such instruments as cymbals and piano will please those who appreciate honest digital audio decoding.

Smart devices play just fine with zdac v.2


  When playing a DSD-to-PCM dub of the Warren Bernhardt So Real SACD — from the Oppo BDP-95 and monitoring via the AKG K702 headphones — the detailed presentation of drum cymbals piano and bass was well spaced. The kick drum was nice and tight. The line-output lets out more image and width when paired up with the gorgeous-sounding MartinLogan Montis electrostatics and the pair of $60,000 Pass XS150 amps that I recently reviewed.
  When comparing the zdac v.2 to the ESS Sabre chip units Benchmark DAC2-D, Mytek Stereo 192-DSD and Resonessence ConceroHP, the zdac's tight, tightly focused signature was more apparent in headphone amp A/B comparisons. The Benchmark and Mytek had more warmth to the mid and bass frequencies, and  a bit more space around the instruments, but again, I liked the analytical persona of the Parasound.
  When comparing the DACs through speaker listening, their sonic personas are harder to differentiate. They all sounded good. Picky headphone listening can spot the audio variables between these DACs, but a room often swallows up those differences. The zdac v.2 is definitely a competitive D/A.

Mobile-source audio
  With the 24/96 ceiling on zdac v.2's USB input, I carefully selected 96K download music to play from a Dell Venue 8 tablet via USB Audio Player Pro software. I linked the two via Wireworld Starlight USB cable, the software player recognized the DAC, and I commenced playing a variety of tunes.
  The first cut I played was "Tangerine," from the 24/96-remastered, hi-res Led Zeppelin III. The remaster has much greater separation and space between the instruments, which includes acoustic guitar and pedal steel guitar, mixed into a widely spaced stereo image. Through the headphones, the zdac v.2 projected the gracious instrument spacing of the mix, and its cool, quick transient character enhanced the detail. The line out into the amp/speaker system was even more immersive through the ML electrostatics.
  When playing a DSD-to-PCM dub of Warren Bernhardt’s So Real SACD — from the Oppo BDP-95 and monitoring via the AKG 702 headphones — the detailed presentation of drum cymbals piano and bass was well spaced. Kick drum was nice and tight. The line-output lets out more image and width when paired up with the gorgeous-sounding MartinLogan Montis electrostatics and the pair of $60,000 Pass XS150 amps

  On my PCM 24/96 dub of the Mercury Living Presence BachThe Complete Cello Suites by Janos Starker SACD, I really liked how well the organic tone of Mr. Starker’s cello — with the complex string harmonics, subtle room reverb—played through the zdac v.2. It may only be $549, but this is a really good DAC.
  As with the original zdac, the zdac v.2 is a smart choice to add new life to your old CD player or a cheap DVD player. I used the zdac v.2 as a high quality DAC/headphone amp for a RCA portable Blu-ray player with built-in 9-inch LCD that I took to my beach house. Playing through a connected HDMI de-embedder, I played CDs, 24/96 hi-res downloads and BD stereo soundtracks using a pair of Oppo PM-1 planar headphones. With the zdac v.2 this little A/V system kicked butt. I even watched The Who - Live at the Isle of Wight 1970 Concert Blue-ray, with the linear PCM stereo soundtrack blasting through the headphones.

A workstation D/A
  For those who have home recording suites (even pros), the zdcac v.2 can be smartly placed next to your editing computer or source deck, and used for monitoring your mixdown or direct stereo recordings. It would be better if it did 24/192 as well, but if you do CD quality or the more typical 24/96, the zdac v.2 works just fine. And as mentioned, it does decodes 24/192 from a Mac through the computer's optical output on the newest Macbook Pros, and outputs the 192  kHz audio at 96 kHz from older Intel Macs.


Per usual, Parasound uses good design and parts selection


  I pressed the zdac v.2 into duty for editing a Gibson jazz guitar track I was working on using a Macbook Pro and the Apple Logic recording/editing program. Via the Shure SRH-1840 open headphones during playback, I could clearly hear deep into the track, with the guitar’s pick attack and smooth Fender Deluxe Reverb harmonics, without any additional grit coming from the DAC. At twice the price, you will not do any better.

The verdict
  As with the original, Parasound zdac  I had few complaints about the zdac v.2, it has true hi-sound quality, the headphone gain gets a boost, we now have separate volume controls for line and headphone, and the a fixed/variable line-out circuit adds to its flexibility. It only lacks the ability to natively play 24/192 music via the USB, though you can play 24/192 via Mac using the optical jack. I know there are lower-cost DACS out there, but when you compare the build quality, parts selection and its "well above its price range" sound, the Parasound zdac v.2 is a steal at $549. A Stellar Sound Award for a stellar DAC.



John Gatski has been evaluating consumer, audiophile, home cinema and professional audio gear since 1992. In 1995, he created Pro Audio Review, and he has written for Audio, Laserviews, Enjoy The Music,The Audiophile Voice and High Performance Review. Everything Audio Network is based in Kensington, MDArticles on this site are the copyright of the ©Everything Audio Network. Any unauthorized use, via print or Internet, without written permission is prohibited. He can be reached via everything.audio@verizon.net

Personal Audio Review!Oppo HA-2 Portable USB Audiophile DAC,Oppo PM-3 Planar Magnetic Headphones

$
0
0
Oppo HA-2 Review Photo Everything Audio Network
Oppo HA-2: The Little DAC That Can 

Brevis...
Price: HA-2 ($299); PM-3 ($399)
Likes: (HA-2) hi-res DSD/PCM, I/O
Likes: (PM-3) comfy, smooth sound
Dislikes: HA-2 needs an auto-off mode 
Wow Factor: how much for this combo?

by John Gatski
  Oppo has done it again. Like its niche-busting BDP-95, BDP-105 universal players and HA-1 premium DAC, the innovative electronics company has come up with another winner: the HA-2 portable, battery powered, DAC/headphone amp. At $299, the HA-2 is an impressive, smart-phone sized DAC; it can decode up to 32-bit/384 PCM, quad-speed DSD, and can drive almost any kind of headphones, including Oppo’s top-of-the-line PM-1, as well as their other models including the PM-3 tested in this article.
  With its hi-res USB 2.0 input doing most of the connectivity tasks, the icing on the cake is that the HA-2 also has an analog input, which makes it dang near compatible with almost any audio device: Android, iPhone, iPad, computers, etc. Plus, it can charge your phone or tablet, if either needs a shot of DC java to keep it going, From an audio quality perspective, the DAC is just as impressive as its feature set, especially with an Android tablet/phone and the USB Audio Player Pro software player. Even versus its big brother audiophile HA-1 DAC preamp, the HA-2 reveals a similar, essential sound signature that belies its under $300 price tag.

Oppo PM-3 budget audiophile headphone and HA-2 DAC

  As for its closed back headphone companion, the new PM-3, introduced concurrently with the HA-2, it is a steal at $399 — offering abundant sonic detail and ample bass wrapped in a planar-magnetic driver smoothness. And the HP is featherweight light and comfy. All in all, the tandem definitely is definitely worth the money.

Features
  Equipped with the ESS Sabre32 Reference ES9018-K2M mobile DAC chip, the HA-2 is a 32-bit-capable, up to 32/384 PCM and 5.6 MHz DSD over DoP playback. The smart-phone sized DAC sports a high/low-gain switch, 1/8th-inch headphone amp out, analog volume control, two USB ports (USB A female, Micro USB female) and an analog in/out 1/8th-inch jack for line out and line in, depending on the setting of the I/O switch. The HA-2 package comes with a Lightning-to-USB connector cable for iPhone/iPad connection, a USB A Male to Micro USB Male cable for charging and computer link-up, and a custom micro USB male to micro USB male OTG cable for use with Android devices.

Simple controls: volume, analog mini-jack I/O and HP jack

  The built-in, high-capacity lithium battery can run in excess of 8 hours, and can even charge your smart phone or tablet. The HA-12 is supplied with a fast charger that outputs 5V at 2.5 amps to 80 percent, then reduces current for that last 20 percent of charging.
  The HA-2 can be mated with Mac, PC, Android and IoS devices that have onboard players via USB or from the analog connection. Either way, you can play any kind of audio from MP3s, FLAC, ripped CDs, linear PCM or DSD. The analog-to-analog 1/8th jack cable allows those with non-digital input devices to take advantage of its superb headphone amp.

 Like its niche-busting BDP-95, BDP-105 universal players and HA-1 premium DAC, the innovative electronics company has come up with another winner: the HA-2 portable, battery powered, DAC/headphone amp. At $299, the HA-2 is an impressive, smart-phone sized DAC; it can decode up to 32-bit/384 PCM and quad-speed DSD.

  Onboard players that come standard on smart devices are often limited on the hi-res playback pathway, but there are third party software players that bypass the digitally limited internal playback systems for computers and mobile devices. These third party programs — such as USB Audio Player Pro for Android and Audirvana, JRiver, and Vox for Mac computers — enable playback of ultra-high sample rate PCM and DSD playback. This high-res playback is where the HA-2 really excels; just plug into the USB and listen to your favorite hi-res tunes from your HD Tracks downloads or original recordings that you make at home.
  From a mobile audio device perspective, I have used the Android-based USB Audio Player for two years with great success in playing up to 32/384 PCM (test files), and up to 24/384 PCM and DSD 5.6 MHz audio files. The HA-2 fits in perfectly with these kinds of software players.

HA-2 input selector switch and dual-USB inputs
  The HA-2 controls its volume in two distinct ways. By mapping USB volume control commands to the Sabre DAC chip's internal digital volume control, the user can adjust the signal volume using the playback app or software — without losing audio resolution or causing bit truncation. The HA-2's analog volume control knob can then be used to further adjust for a comfortable listening level. Speaking of control, the HA-2 also has a bass boost function switch that is implemented purely with the analog audio circuits, adding about 6 dB of boost in the 80 Hz to 180 kHz frequencies.
  We did not measure the HA-2’s audio parameters, but an Oppo spokesman said that signal-to-noise from the low-voltage, low current circuit is in excess of -108 dB. Pretty darn good for a battery powered mini-DAC!

New PM headphone
  The PM-3 planar magnetic headphone is similar in look and styles as the $1,200 PM-1 released last year with the flagship HA-1 DAC/line/HP amp. But Oppo has managed to squeeze in planar-magnetic driver technology and comfort in this closed-back budget audiophile headphone, which retails under $400.
  Planar magnetic design drivers has been around for about 40 years. It is basically a hybrid design utilizing the principle of magnetic speaker design and electromagnetic design. Like a dynamic headphone — with its standard magnet drivers — planar magnetic headphones use a magnetic field that surrounds a conductor, which has an electrical current flowing through it to drive the speaker diaphragm. Planar magnetic drivers are noted for their smooth, slightly warm, musical tones without excessive top-end harshness. And in recent years, companies such as HIFiMAN and Audieze have been part of the technology's resurgence.
Oppo PM-3: planar magnetic HP for $400

  The PM-3 has been pared down in materials and ultimate design versus the premium price PM-1, but much of the PM-1’s essential design was incorporated into the PM-3. The Oppo HPs features 55-mm planar magnetic drivers, utilizing a symmetric, push-pull, neodymium magnet. The PM-3 was designed by Igor Levitsky, a noted acoustical engineer, who has been a speaker designer for more than 30 years. The PM-3 specs include 102 dB sensitivity at 100 MW input power.
  The PM-3 is said to be the lightest planar magnetic closed-back headphone on the market, weighing in at 10 ounces; its light weight is the result of using lighter weight driver and headband materials. Though lightweight, the PM-3 fit just fine around my ears with adequate clamping. when I moved my head about.
  The headphones come with a denim carrying case, an audiophile 3-meter cable with 1/4 phone jack adapter. Optionally, you can buy an accessory cable that also has a built-in mic for smart devices listening and talking.

The setup
  I connected the HA-2 to various audio output devices for this test, including a 2015 Apple iMac, an HTC smart phone, and Dell Venue 8 Android tablet. The smart devices were linked to the HA-2 via the supplied OTG link cable. The computer was connected via a USB A male-to-USB B male cable from Wireworld’s Starlight brand. Other USB DACs on hand included a Benchmark DAC-2D, Oppo HA-1 and USB-input Resonessence Concero HP, which is bus powered.
  I also compared the HA-2 to current portable player/DAC/HP amp combos, such as the Astell and Kern AK-100 and the HIFIMAN HM-802, which are considerably more expensive than the DAC-only Oppo HA-2., but remember they have a built-in player. Other headphones were also brought into the review: Shure SRH1840, AKG K702, Sony MDR-7510, and Oppo’s PM-1 flagship.

The audition
  My first listening scenario was using the Oppo with the HTC HK Edition smart phone, updated with the Lollipop Android version. Using the supplied special OTG cable and two supplied neoprene bands, I hooked the phone and HA-2 together make a singular unit. Its is bit hefty in weight compared to standalone players, but the two units tied together have a robust, high-end feel.
  Upon first play of various Hi-Res Jazz and Classical tracks, my first impression of the Oppo combo was one of awe. How did Oppo squeeze in such high-end sound into such a low-cost DAC? Listening to a dub of Kenny Burrell - Midnight Blue SACD at 24/192, this jazz guitar and accompanying band recording relays its sound via a generous, full stereo image. The cut "Midnight Blue" personified that ESS Sabre32’s smooth, yet quick attack on the transient tones, such as drum cymbals. It makes for a satisfying hi-fi listening experience.
Oppo PM-3 headphone, HA-2 DAC photo on everything audio network
Smart phone, tablet? Oppo PM-3/HA-2 an ideal match

  Through the PM-3s and the other headphones auditioned with the DAC, the signature was similar, taking into account variations in the HPs. The HA-2‘s easy-to-listen character puts some audiophile high-DACs to shame in the smoothness department. This DAC generates zero listener fatigue. I had a number of readers ask me about the HA-2 compared to the Oppo HA-1 audiophile DAC. Ultimately, the HA-2’s sonic width and depth is not the equal of the Oppo HA 1 (remember it has a $1,299 price tag) and discrete HP amp) or a Benchmark DAC2, but you know you are listening to hi-res through this DAC.
  Compared to the AK 100 hi-res portable player, the Oppo is slightly warmer and smoother on top. The HIFIMAN player mimics the Oppo smooth character, but through my headphones, the Oppo seemed a smidge more spacious in the stereo image. however, neither of the player/DACs play 24/352.8 (DXD) downloads, such as 2L.
  On playback of the ultra hi-res (24/352.8 DXD) Mozart Violin Concerto 1 (2L), the HA-1 really did a good job with the detailed recording’s violin harmonics, as well as the dynamics of the orchestra. And yet again, not a hint of any harshness on the top end.
  In switching musical genres, I played the 24/96 20th Anniversary of Nirvana - In Utero, never considered the epitome of hi-fi. Considering its low-fi, Grunge roots, I was surprised by how much the remastered tracks revealed: way more separation among the guitar, bass and drum layers, and much tighter tone of Curt Cobain’s distorted Fender guitar. Again, I was impressed with HA-2’s ability to decode and play this album with only the intended sonic haze being relayed.

Budget-priced PM headphone
  The PM-3 headphone is good fit for the mobile HA-2 DAC; its high sensitivity, slightly elevated midbass, and enhanced presence sonic signature — coupled with its closed back construction — allow listeners in noisy environments to keep the music flowing. The Oppo PM-1 flagship is a bit richer in the instrument tone and fuller in the low bass, but the PM-3 is revealing in its own way and much lighter. It is as good as several $500+ phones I have sampled. It is not as extended sounding as my AKG K702, but the PM-3 is well balanced — especially for $399
 For the money, no competitor can touch the compact, self-powered HA-2 DAC. You can use it with your smart phone, tablet or your computer software players, analog or digital output. Heck, you can even use it with your main audiophile system.

  On my ears, I found the PM-3 feel nearly perfect: the light weight definitely enhances the long-term wear factor, and they did not clamp too tightly. Speaking of ergonomics, the standard cable does not have the audiophile cachet of the PM-1/PM-2’s, thickly wrapped audiophile cord, but it is easier to manage since it bends much easier than big brother’s nylon wrapped cords.

Perfect for computer audio
  For computer listening, I connected the HA-2 to my iMac, and played from several different software players. Audirvana worked hitch free, up to 24/384 (my own home brew guitar recordings), and numerous HD Tracks downloads and various other recordings. The HA-2 and the PM-3 HPs came in handy when I wen to my beach house. I used the Macbook Pro and the Oppo duo for a length editing session on some vinyl ripping I had done at 24/192 A/D via a Benchmark ADC1 A/D converter. With the Oppos' in hand, I recorded the LPs in Audacity, then edited out the into surface noise and the outro surface noise, then enjoyed the sonic results of my work. As with the smart devices, the LP-dub audio from the computer to the HA-2 sounded fantastic. The original LP had enhanced separation, and I heard every bit of that wide stereo image through the HA-2.
  From a functional standpoint, I had no problems with the HA-2. Its two USB ports come in handy for variable device matching, and its long-life battery netted me almost 9 hours of continuous play through headphones. As claimed it will charge a smart phone, but you cannot charge the DAC battery and the phone battery at the same time. It took four hours to charge the HTC battery,  at 6 percent remaining, using the HA-2’s USB A female output jack; at, the end of the charging cycle, the DAC battery was significantly drawn down.
  On other phones and tablets (such as my Dell Venue 8) you can use an OTG/charge adapter and charge the phone and DAC at the same time when using a USB Hub. Highly recommended for Android devices.
  One thing I would like to see Oppo add to the DAC is an auto shut-off function. I ran the battery down to zero four times times during the review; I kept forgetting to turn it off. The little power indicator lights are not enough of a reminder to turn it off. Thus, an auto turn-off that puts the unit to sleep (after a fixed number of minutes of being idle) would enhance battery longevity.
Android tablet with USB Audio Player Pro and HA-2

  The other oddity noted was the initial lack of 32-bit pathway recognition when using Apple computers. I discovered that the HA-2, initially, did not show up as a 32-bit DAC in the Mac’s Audio settings. Apparently, a software variable prevented the Mac from seeing the DAC’s 32-bit option. I alerted Oppo to my discovery and they developed a firmware upgrade, which enabled the 32-bit pathway. (Publisher's Note: Before I get criticized about how 32 bit PCM is pointless, I am aware there are no 32-bit recordings, and almost no 32-bit recoding gear, but I am sure it will come in the near future. There are DACs that have the playback capability, including the Oppo HA-1 and HA-2, as well as TEAC UD-501. In the meantime, I have created 32-bit integer test recordings by upconverting 24-bi files. There is no sonic improvement since the 32-bit is not native, but this upconversion allows me to see if 32-bit DACs recognize the 32 bit integer tag of my test tracks).
  One other ergonomic note about the HA-2. Although I like the idea of attaching the DAC to a smart phone with the neoprene bands. It is an inelegant docking solution. Positioning of the band can cover up portions of the phone display and you can scuff up your phone. It would be great if Oppo, or an accessory company, could come up with a case that holds the two units and allows for easy access to controls and the cable ports.

The verdict
  For the money, no competitor can touch the compact, self-powered HA-2 DAC. You can use it with your smart phone, tablet or your computer software players, analog or digital output. Heck, you can even use it with your main audiophile system via an 1/8th-inch-to-RCA adapter out the analog port. It won’t beat the big boy DACs, but you are in the ball park. And how many $300 DACs can decode ultra high sample rate music to 384, and quad speed DSD? I carry the HA-2 everywhere I go when I want to listen to hi-res on my HTC phone or Dell tablet. And I have gotten in the habit of throwing it in my laptop bag when I go out for recording tasks. There are numerous scenarios in which the HA-2 can accomplish the task. computer, phone, tablet. You can even hook the analog output of an iPod to take advantage of the HA-2’s extra HP gain.
  The PM-1 planar magnetic is very good companion headphone that is hi-fi enough, lightweight and, again, quite inexpensive for a serious headphone. If you buy it with the DAC, you have a dandy little, hi-res DAC/HP monitor system for under $700. Ain’t that a reason to give the tandem an Everything Audio NetworkStellar Sound Award? I think so.

   John Gatski has been evaluating consumer, audiophile, home cinema and professional audio gear since 1992. In 1995, he created Pro Audio Review, and he has written for Audio, Laserviews, Enjoy The Music,The Audiophile Voice and High Performance Review. Everything Audio Network is based in Kensington, MD. Articles on this site are the copyright of the ©Everything Audio Network. Any unauthorized use, via print or Internet, without written permission is prohibited. He can be reached via everything.audio@verizon.net


Audio Gear Review Archive!Everything Audio NetworkActive Review Compendium

$
0
0
                  Sponsored Link!


Click to see each archived review
SVS SB12 Ultra 1000W Powered Subwoofer
MartinLogan Neolith Electrostatic Speaker Preview
Andrew Jones SP-PK52FS/Pioneer Elite SC-79 Receiver
Westlake Tower 6 3-Way Loudspeaker
TASCAM DA-3000 Hi-Res PCM/DSD Recorder
Atlantic Technology H-PAS Soundbar
Prism Sound Lyra One Recording Interface
Rogue Audio Pharaoh Integrated Hybrid Amp
Essential Sound Products Essence Reference-II Power Cable
First Listen! TASCAM DA-3000/ Sony PCM-D100 Recorders
Pass Labs SR-2 Three-Way Loudspeaker
Amp Preview: Benchmark AHB2 First Listen
Paradigm MillenniaOne CT Powered 2.1 Speaker System
Retro Revuew! Shure SM81 Instrument Microphone
Mytek Stereo192-DSD D/A


Audiophile Modification Review!Music Technology Oppo BDP-95 PlayerDigital Clock/Discrete Analog Out Upgrade

$
0
0

©Everything Audio Network

Brevis
Price: $1,800 (unbal.); $2,400 (bal.)
Likes: organic analog tone, smooth treble
Dislikes: audiophile modifications cost $
Wow Factor! a more intimate-sounding '95
More info: Music Technology

by John Gatski
  Like cars, hot-rodding a piece of audio equipment has been around since, well, since the advent of audio gear. From simple replacement of stock tubes with “high-end” hand selected tubes to changing power supply capacitors, output devices, etc., no piece of audio gear is perfect when it is stock, say those who seek to always make hi-fi sound better.
  I remember in the 1990s, getting an Audio by Van Alstine Dynaco ST-70 upgrade kit that claimed to improve the classic EL-34 tube amp by installing a new component board with quieter driver tubes and improved power supply parts. Guess what? It worked; the upgrade kit significantly tightened the ST-70‘s lumpy bass, decreased the self-noise and gave the warm tone a little sparkle.
  Well here I am, 20 years later, in the middle of another article about a mod of a different component: an analog mod to a popular piece of digital gear, the very popular Oppo BDP-95/BDP-105 universal player, which uses the high-end ESS Saber 9018 DAC chip. As my reviews have noted over the last five years, these Oppo players offer tremendous bang-for-the-buck features and quite good audio. But of course, the tweakers always want to squeeze out a little more, so we sought a mod-focused company to see if we could get more sound out of an Oppo— and at what cost.

The Music Tech mod
  The modification I am reviewing here is the Music Technology discrete-output analog output section upgrade (JFET discrete output with upscale wire, caps, and resistors), combined with a digital clock upgrade that increases the clock frequency from 50 MHz to 80 MHz and provides substantially more power regulation of the clock than stock. Developed by Music Technology’s guru Bill Thalmann, the analog output upgrade is claimed to net a more audiophile, rich, organic presentation than the stock op-amp outputs. The clock mod is claimed to enhance digital conversion stability, and audibly increase the focus of the image and sense of space.
The green PCBs show the overall Music Tech/Oppo upgrade

  Music Technology has plenty of experience in the inner-workings of audio gear. It is one of the top East Coast hi-fi/pro audio repair facilities, located in Springfield, Va., and has a solid reputation for troubleshooting perplexing components. The company also does specialty repair and upgrades, including the reel-to-reel deck upgrades for the Tape Project Apogee ribbon speaker rebuilds, and can fix all brands of pro and musician-related gear.
  “Music Technology’s SACD/CD/DAC upgrades consist of our SteadiClock high precision, low-jitter clock and our all JFET analog signal path upgrade,” Thalmann said. “Practically all stock players use an abundance of op-amps. In my opinion, no matter how good the op-amp, they simply will never sound as good as a low- or no-feedback discrete circuit. The reason for this is the amount of feedback needed to control an op-amp’s gain. This damages time coherence, which hurts image focus, among other things.”
 I think it’s quite commendable that the Music Technology mod can eek out this enhanced listening experience considering how good the stock Oppo player is. With the upgrade, you get a more classic audiophile sound stage, that aforementioned smoothness, plus all the ergonomic benefits of the Oppo players.

  Music Technology has plenty of experience hot-rodding digital audio players. In 2004, Thalmann performed numerous Vacuum-State mods of Sony SACD players, such as the classic SCD-777ES and SCD-2000ES audiophile — players that were long on innovation, but came up short in ultimate playback potential. The VS mods, as I can attest since I had my ‘777 tweaked by Music Technology, pushed the players to true audiophile caliber — with a velvet smoothness and a wider soundstage. Thalmann said that Music Technology’s own custom digital player upgrades bring that audible finesse and to almost any player made today.
  Music Technology performs its upgrades for most digital players in either balanced or unbalanced configurations. But according to Thalmann, the Oppo BDP-95/105 series are popular candidates for the mod because they have a good-sounding stock circuit: the premium ESS Sabre DAC 9018 chip, which is known for its excellent performance and is widely implemented in audiophile players and DACs.
  Thalmann says the Music Technology discrete J-FET analog output and clock mod require quite a bit of PCB board modification to get it to fit in the Oppo players, especially the balanced version. But once the upgrades are made, usually two weeks from the time the player is shipped to MT, the time and expense is worth it, Thalmann added.
High quality caps are used throughout the mod circuit

  The upgrade price is $2,400 for the balanced/clock mod, which can be done in the Oppo 103/105s because of the extra room in that slightly bigger chassis — and $1,800 for the unbalanced/clock upgrade that was done in the BDP-95 for this review. Potential customers also should know that the said modification voids your factory warranty. If you don’t mind paying for a new one and losing your warranty, you can buy a new BDP-105 Oppo for $1,200 and have the player shipped to Music Technology for the upgrade. Another, less costly, acquisition route would be to find a used BDP-95 for, say, $400 or $500 and then do the unbalanced mod. The ’95 and ‘105 use the same DAC and both have balanced outputs. The stock ‘105 has a beefier power supply, fan-less cooling and could play DSD from a thumb drive, but essentially sounds the same as the BDP-95.

The candidate
  The mod version I reviewed was a 2012 Oppo BDP-95. To audibly determine whether the digital clock mod and the analog mod make an audible improvement in the player’s sonics, I had the upgrade done in stages and then evaluated their subjective performance, separately, and then with both in place. The clock mod was done first then the analog output upgrade
  Music Technology took about a week to complete the clock mod in late 2014. After the circuit was added, Thalmann said it needed a week of burn in. After the break-in period, I commenced the listening comparison between the Music Technology-modified BDP-95, and a stock BDP-105 (which essentially sounds the same as a stock ‘95.) I set up a listening test that included a Benchmark DAC2-D (now the DX), the stock ‘105 and the clock-modified ’95.
MT can mod unbalanced or balanced output, plus digital clock

  I took the analog outs from each component and connected them to a Coda preamp, which is quite transparent and has fast input switching. I matched the levels using test tones and an AudioControl RTA for each of the players and the DAC. The modified ’95 provided the digital signal for the Benchmark DAC. The Coda preamp fed a Rogue Audio Medusa hybrid amp/MartinLogan Montis electrostatic speaker set up. A fixed output from the Coda also distributed audio to a Bryston BHA-1 headphone amp. Oppo PM-1 and AKG K702 headphones were used during HP listening.
  All analog connections were made using WireWorld premium interconnects. A WireWorld coaxial digital cable linked the BDP-95 to the Benchmark DAC. Essential Sound Essence II reference power cords linked all components to the AC.

On the clock
  First up was the Warren BernhardtSo Real recording (Tom Jung’s DMP label). The original DSD, live-to two-track jazz album is so good, that I dubbed off a 24/96 version, made with the magnificent, accurate, ultra dynamic Benchmark ADC1 A/D so I could use the music to test PCM products as well. It is a perfect recording to test, subjectively, with extended dynamic range and excellent stereo imaging.
  After several hours of careful listening to the modded clock circuit in the BDP-95 player versus the stock Oppo, playing through the ML Montis and through the Bryston Headphone amp, I could not reliably hear a difference between it and the stock ‘105. Imaging focus, timbre, transient reproduction sounded identical. I played dozens of additional tracks over the next week, and the result was the same with the A/B comparisons. If there was a difference, I could not reliably hear it with the clock mod.
Music Technology has plenty of experience in the inner-workings of audio gear. It is one of the top East Coast hi-fi/pro audio repair facilities, located in Springfield, Va., and has a solid reputation for troubleshooting perplexing components. The company also does specialty repair and upgrades, including the reel-to-reel deck upgrades for the Tape Project and Apogee ribbon speaker rebuilds.

  I checked in with Thalmann and told him about my sonic observation with Phase I of the mod. He said the clock mod stems from his Vacuum State mods he did prior to his own custom mods, when the DAC clocks were not as good as they are today. I can attest that the Vacuum State clock mods did make a difference in smoothness on the old Sony SACD players, but today’s stock digital clocks, integrated into the Oppo and many other players, may be good enough that any further modification of the circuit will not net any sonic benefit. Older digital players, though, may benefit from the clock mod.
  Thalmann said the Oppo clock is better than most stock SACD/universal players, but he believes it is still possible to get some improvement with his clock mod that is further showcased by the analog upgrade. To my ears, I did not hear a difference with the clock mod by itself.

Part II: the analog connection
  So I sent the player back to Bill so he could do the analog output section mod. After a couple of weeks. He called me and said it was ready. I picked up the player. Allowed it to “stew” for a few days, and then resumed my listening sessions that I had started weeks before.
  This time, in the first few minutes of the Bernhardt album play, I definitely could hear an audible difference between the stock BDP-105 and the upgraded ’95. There was a warm, more laid back presentation from the modified Oppo. As good as the stock player is for sound quality — a warm, smooth midrange and tight bass — there are some types of music with low-treble, presence emphasized instruments that can sound a little glassy. The Music Technology analog mod smooths out that glare, more like a tube-design signal path. A textured presentation that gets its presence tamed a bit. More natural on upper register piano, high notes on a violin and the metallic brush attack of a drum cymbal. This signature reminds me of the best turntable/preamp combo played through a FET or tube amp, but the bass is more accurate.
The Music Technology analog mod smooths out that glare, more like a tube-design signal path. A textured presentation that gets its presence tamed a bit. More natural on upper register piano, high notes on a violin and the metallic brush attack of a drum cymbal.

  I did notice, however that the top end seemed to be a bit constrained versus the Benchmark and the stock ‘105. I asked Bill if he was doing any additional filtering on the top-end to enhance its analog organic flavor perception in the midband. He said indeed the roll-off filter, centered at 30 kHz, was in the circuit. I asked if he could extend the frequency response to 40 or 50 kHz in order to open up the top of the base band enough to allow high-res recordings with extended top-end to standout in the playback. He complied, swapping in a 40 kHz filter.
  Back in the review system, the Music Technology-modded Oppo, with new bandwidth filter, now was hitting its stride. Over several months I played scores of recordings that were flattered by the change. Old '80s CDs really benefited from the Music Technology/Oppo treatment. My vintage 1988 ‘Til Tuesday  —Everything’s Different Now, sounded less glaring through the Music Technology-designed mod. And the HD Tracks Tom Petty and The HeartbreakersDamn The Torpedoes 24/94 album, always a bit edgy to my ears, gets a smoother sonic portrayal — without sounding rolled-off. “Just right” was what I had written in my notes.
  Versus the $2,000 Benchmark DAC, the modded Oppo held its own, but the separate D/A netted a modicum of increased resolution in the top-end and a small, but noticeable high-treble presence that the Oppo mod lacked. The Oppo, however, was a trace smoother in the low treble. Would be interesting to hear the MT mod in the Benchmark.

Hot-rod Oppo
  After all the listening was over, I mulled over the sonic merits of the Music Technology mod, I knew that the eternal question would be: is the Music Technology mod worth the bucks? To my ears and through very careful listening, the analog mod definitely has an audible effect on the sound over a stock Oppo. Its classic, textured, almost tube-like persona should appeal to those who like the organic, analog character in their music. Those who want their digital to sound more like vinyl and tube amps. Smoother with a generous, wide, sonic portrait that makes you want to is sit down with a glass of red wine and spend the evening listening to a symphony, or Kenny Burrell’s Midnight Blue SACD.
BDP-93/95/103/105 players are prime candidates for MT mod

  I think it’s quite commendable that the Music Technology mod can eek out this enhanced listening experience considering how good the stock Oppo player is. With the upgrade, you get a more classic audiophile sound stage, that aforementioned smoothness, plus all the ergonomic benefits of the Oppo players, including ability to play music from a thumb drive as well as SACDs, DVD-As and Blu-rays.
  Since the clock mod is part of the upgrade package, it does not hurt the player to have it done,. But in my test setup, I could not reliably hear a difference between the clock-modded ’95 and a stock BDP-105. The JFET analog mod, however, does make a difference. Music Tech said they believe the two mods together make a bigger difference than just the analog mod. Since I did the clock mod first, I do not know if the analog mod by itself would have sounded different.

The verdict
  I can’t wait for Music Technology to add more products to the “mod” list, such as some classic DACs and CD players. As long as there is room to install the board, Music Technology can mod pretty much any DAC or digital player.
  Based on my listening experience, the Music Technology mod is worthy of an Everything Audio Network Stellar Sound Award, but as with most audiophile mods that I have seen, upgrades don’t come cheap. If you buy a new BDP-105 player at $1,200 and spend $2,400 for the balanced upgrade/clock package, you’ve got $3,600 invested. If you are big in the wallet, it does not matter. If not, find a used player to sweeten the proposition. Either way, I think you will like the result.

   John Gatski has been evaluating consumer, audiophile, home cinema and professional audio gear since 1992. In 1995, he created Pro Audio Review, and he has written for Audio, Laserviews, Enjoy The Music,The Audiophile Voice and High Performance Review. Everything Audio Network is based in Kensington, MD. Articles on this site are the copyright of the ©Everything Audio Network. Any unauthorized use, via print or Internet, without written permission is prohibited. He can be reached via everything.audio@verizon.net

EAN UpClose:Luminous Audio ArionDesigner Mike Bettinger

$
0
0
Audio Designer Mike Bettinger at 2014 CAF

EAN: Can you give our readers a little background about yourself as an audio designer?
MB: I apprenticed as a technician in my uncle’s stereo repair shop while attending school in the mid 1970’s, during the birth of high-end audio as we know it today and one of audio design’s most creative and productive periods. I was influenced and intrigued by the sonic differences among amplifiers and preamps that passed through my bench system, a constant test environment. This started my 30+ year investigation into the differences in the design and execution of audio circuitry. From 1976 through 1990, I owned GASworks Modifications, modifying high-end audio components. This work provided me an endless supply of equipment, allowing me to research all of the classic designs and their engineers’ approaches. I experimented endlessly, comparing all of the many circuit variations and building blocks used to create these components.
  An 18-year sidetrack as an equipment engineer for two major semiconductor manufacturers exposed me to the cutting edge of the broader world of high precision electronic equipment design and some of the worst RFI environments that they were required to function flawlessly in. These experiences created for me a short-list approach to apply to audio circuit design, highlighting the importance of circuit layout, grounding, component choices, and physical requirements for optimum resolution. The Arion is the fully realized implementation of all of the lessons learned over 35 years. Its performance satisfies my personal impression of what a phono preamp should sound like  An 18 year sidetrack as an equipment engineer for two major semiconductor manufacturers exposed me to the cutting edge of the broader world of high precision electronic equipment design and some of the worst RFI environments that they were required to function flawlessly in. These experiences created for me a short-list approach to apply to audio circuit design, highlighting the importance of circuit layout, grounding, component choices, and physical requirements for optimum resolution. The Arion is the fully realized implementation of all of the lessons learned over 35 years. Its performance satisfies my personal impression of what a phono preamp should sound like. 

What are the important designs highlights that you have implemented into the Arion. (Specific circuits. etc.). Is there any specific parts that you would like to note in your design?
MB: Our designs focus on low level resolving capabilities, minimization of circuit interactions that add congestion and background textures to the sound, and neutral retrieval of the most subtle information present in a recording. This is what makes circuits sound the most musical.
  My recipe to accomplish this is much like the ingredients a chef would use in a culinary recipe. My choices and how I apply them are what are what make the Arion different. The power supplies are extremely low noise and stable; the support circuitry such as current sources, cascodes, biasing, etc. have all been painstaking evaluated for best performance in the overall circuitry. Biasing of the various stages is performed in real-time by ear.
  The real highlight of the design is the layout and physical relationship of the circuitry as a whole. All signals and power flow through the circuits in complex loops; each of these loops has been carefully evaluated, with the layout processing being reminiscent of an intense game of chess with each part’s placement and interaction being carefully considered in the process. The overall PCB design reflects this attention to detail as well by including controlled return planes and distributed capacitance instead of relying on an overall ground plane. Physically, the chassis is isolated by custom sourced feet of a soft durometer silicon-based material. The PCB is designed to float in the vertical plane, minimizing vibration transfer with the chassis base plate. The results are easily discernable in the Arion’s low level resolving capabilities, the speed and control of the dynamics and the utter lack of confusion or congestion when the music complexity or dynamic requirements step up. 

The Arion is a very accurate, clean, low-noise phono preamp that really showcases well-recorded vinyl. Why did you go that route as opposed to the “warm and rich” audio path, that I often hear in high-end phono preamps?
MB: While it would be cool to say that I voiced the design for a particular sound, the sound of the Arion is the result of our focus on two areas that have always irritated us when listening to music.
The first was that the Arion had to possess the natural bloom that accompanies live music, which is readily apparent on live recordings that capture the sound of the room and is also heard in the full body of the vocals or instruments. 
  Also, the design had to be tonally pure in that vocals or strings had to be processed by the Arion without the addition of the edge normally associated with transistor designs. The Arion’s design focused first on creating a clean ground reference and by controlling signal return currents. Secondly, dialing in stage biasing allows the active devices to operate in their most sensitive regions. The sound you experience is an extension of these efforts. An Arion is not finished until it satisfies us in this regard.

Any new products on the horizon?
MB:We have designs and prototypes created for both a line stage and power amp; we hope both will be released in the not-too-distant future. 

    John Gatski has been evaluating consumer, audiophile, home cinema and professional audio gear since 1992. In 1995, he created Pro Audio Review, and he has written for Audio, Laserviews, Enjoy The Music, The Audiophile Voice and High Performance Review. Everything Audio Network is based in Kensington, Md. Articles on this site are the copyright of the ©Everything Audio Network. Any unauthorized use, via print or Internet, without written permission is prohibited. John Gatski can be reached via everything.audio@verizon.net 








Audiophile Turntable/Preamp Review!VPI Scout 1.1, Luminous Audio Arion“Turntable, Preamp With Accuracy Focus”

$
0
0

©Everything Audio Network

Brevis...
Price: Scout 1.1 ($2,000); Arion($6,395)
Likes: tracking, accuracy, rugged USA build
Dislikes: must have expert arm setup (VPI)
Wow Factor: masterful vinyl playback system
More info:  VPI, Luminous Audio


by John Gatski
  As much as I am a proponent of pushing digital recording and playback’s ultimate resolution and realism for music playback (Tom Jung and I, as an audio journalist, were involved with DSD since its practical beginning). I still have a fondness for LP records, keep a good turntable on hand and have plenty of hi-res vinyl.
  When you consider how old the technology is, records can still sound fantastic. Much to the amazement of many audiophiles, the phonograph biz has actually picked up over the last five years — with more affordable audiophile products and, of course, there is no shortage of good sounding vinyl to listen to — from vintage treasured LPs to state-of-the-art remasters and pop album releases.
  From the equipment perspective, you can spend a few hundred dollars to a few thousand, or more, to get the right feature set for your turntable and your preamp purchases. For this review, I got the chance to test the improved version of the fabled VPI Scout, the Scout 1.1, and the Arion, a dandy, discrete phono preamp – from Tim Stinson’s Luminous Audio, located in Richmond, Virginia. The preamp was designed by audio engineer Mike Bettinger of GAS Audio modification fame. (Click here to read more about Mike's design and background.)
 If you are a vinyl stalwart with a bit of disposable income, the VPI Scout 1.1 and Luminous Audio Arion are two worthy candidates for purchase. If you are moving up, or even as a first turntable system purchase, it might be the last vinyl system you need to buy.

  Tested here is the recently upgraded VPI Scout 1.1 belt drive turntable, priced at $2,000, with an Ortofon Black MM cartridge mounted on the JMW-9T unipoint tone arm, and the Luminous Audio Arion solid-state, phono preamp, priced at $6,395.
Luminous Audio Arion
  The Arion is a single-purpose preamp and, as such, means ease of operation and intuitive connectivity. It features a front panel mute button, on/off switch and a MM/MC cartridge switch. On the back are a pair of unbalanced and a par of balanced (rare) XLR inputs, unbalanced inputs and unbalanced outputs (RCA). The power switch is located on the rear as well. The Arion package also includes a hospital grade power cord.

  The Luminous Arion is a discrete, Class A stage phono preamplifier. The preamp stage design incorporates Toshiba JFET and output transistors, Sanyo power transistors and Analog Devices JFET devices, mounted on a 4-layer PC board layout. Polypropylene film capacitors and 1% metal film resistors are utilized throughout the layout, The power supply contains split-bobbin C-core transformers and Fairchild Stealth rectifiers. Separate transformers are used for the +/— raw supplies.
  The Arion contains a two-stage design with a cascoded discrete JFET input stage, followed by a differential cascode JFET second stage and a passive/active RIAA EQ stage. The first stage provides an interface with the cartridge, and it provides the gain and drive for the passive EQ network. This stage includes cascoded, parallel JFETs and bipolar cascoded voltage amp stage. Gain switching is accomplished through latching relays. The second stage provides additional gain for the low-frequency RIAA curve. Its circuit layout features cascoded Toshiba JFET differential amplifiers. The final output is Class-A biased.
  The unit comes from assembly with a factory 47-kOhm MM setting and 100 Ohm MC setting, which can be designed with optional resistors to precisely match a cartridge. All in all, the Arion is a phono preamp with an emphasis on performance.

Simple, but effective Arion connection panel

  Factory rated specs include: .005% distortion, 85 dB S/N (A-weighted MM), 78 dB S/N (A-weighted MC), 40 dB gain (MM), and 62 dB gain (MC). The unit measures 17.25 inches wide, 13-inches deep and 3,.50 inches tall. Weight is 20 pounds.
  The Arion design concept began after Stinson met Mike Bettinger at a Richmond Audio society meeting, where Bettinger engaged him in conversations about high-end audio design. Stinson eventually made a visit to Bettinger’s home and was “blown away” (his words) by the designer’s system.
  “The bottom line is that his system instantly fit into one of the top two or three that I had ever heard in my life” Stinson recalled, “and with $3,500 MartinLogans as the speakers. I had never heard ML’s sound quite like this.
  ”Impressed with Bettinger’s background and the products that he modified for his own use, Stinson commissioned him to design the high-end, no limits Arion. “I literally came to Mike and told him to design the Arion, regardless of cost,” Stinson explained. “He (Bettinger) was totally taken back. ‘Engineers are never given a blank check,’ Stinson remembered Bettinger responding. “What a concept!”

Inside the Luminous Audio Arion phono pre
  Since Stinson had a high-end phono preamp in mind, he asked Bettinger about adding more “exotic” resistors, caps, etc. as he expected it to potentially approach a $10,000 price tag. Bettinger quickly addressed this high-end parts list request, Stinson noted, by pointing out that such components are often “designed” to sound soft or more “musical,” etc, but not accurate.
  Thus, Bettinger used components, board design and a custom power supply to create a phono preamp that showcased the best LPs, cartridges and tone arms — no added coloration from this preamp.
The VPI Scout 1.1
  The updated Scout 1.1 tested here is the successor to the original Scout. Similar in design and appearance to the original, the new version gets the heavy duty, 1-1/8"-thick MDF bonded-to-a-12-gauge steel plate VPI plinth. The new platter is a 1 3/8"-thick 6061 aluminum design (no more acrylic platter) featuring a stainless-steel damping mount, which rests on an oil bath bearing by a Number 2 Jacobs Taper. The bearing mechanism contains a PEEK thrust-disc and machined-graphite, impregnated brass bushings — using a Thompson Engineering 60 Rockwell case hardened shaft.
  The 600 RPM AC synchronous belt-drive motor (from the Traveler) is self-contained in a steel housing located on the turntable’s left side. The Scout also includes the Traveler’s record mat, which is claimed to offer superior resonance dampening.

The VPI Scout 1.1 tracks as good as it looks


  The Scout 1.1 came with the JMW-9T tone arm with an Ortofon 2M Black MM cartridge, a decent MM cartridge that sounds good on most kinds of music, But in my opinion, the Ortofon lacks the upper-end detail and space attributes of better MC cartridges. The JMW-9T tone arm takes a bit of setup — with its required tracking angle, height adjustment and the friction anti-skate setup that we ignored while using our beloved L04 MC cartridge. It also needs a stylus force gauge for proper balancing.
  The Scout 1.1 utilizes a connector block mounted behind the platter that allows the owner to use his favorite unbalanced cables. It also includes a ground post for wiring the ground to the preamp. There also is a ground post on the chassis. With its heavy metal platter and platform, the Scout 1.1 weighs in at a solid 40 pounds. I am a sucker for a good looking turntable and this VPI looked grand in my rack. Ain’t nothing like a turntable sitting in your rig to make an audiophile beam out loud.
The setup
  One of the requirements of being a high-end vinyl tester is that, unlike digital players, you gotta do some manual labor to make sure those LPs play properly. Turntable needs include cartridge mounting and setup, installing the motor and belt, installing ground wires and cables. The preamp is pretty much plug and play, unless your MC cartridge needs some resistance tweaking to get that ideal match.

An ideal match: Benz cartridge and JMW-9T arm

  For these review associated setup tasks, I turned to Music Technology in Springfield, Va. Audio ace extraordinaire Bill Thalman, who set up the Scout 1.1 for me,  made a resistor change in the Arion so we could optimize the re-tipped, fantastically accurate-sounding Benz L0.4, a $1,200 cartridge from a decade ago that has since been superseded. The MM Ortofon is okay for casual listening, but for such a revealing phono preamp, and the fact I was using MartinLogan Montis electrostatics and a very revealing amp, the Benz was a much better fit.
  Bill Thalman installed the cartridge into the JMW-9T arm, setting tracking angle, azimuth, and stylus force. He also pulled the cover from the Arion and changed the MC resistor to net a bit more smoothness in the treble.

I immediately zeroed on Arion's dynamic range, excellent signal-to-noise, and its ability to relay the bass without bloomy midbass bottom end — a character I have noticed in numerous high-end phono preamps.

  The Scout’s arm has a mechanical anti-skate, but we did not use it, instead adding a bit more tracking force (overall 2.5 grams) to compensate for the skating effect. With the Benz L0.4 and the precision JMW-9T, our play tests revealed no audible artifacts, such as the tell-tell end of LP inner groove distortion. It all sounded clean and ready for some serious record playing.
  I should note that I also did additional listening using a Clear Audio Emotion turntable and the classic MM AT-ML150 cartridge, the 1980s version, which is still in pristine condition. But that was not the focus of this review. The AT cartridge had a more pronounced treble than the Benz, but the bottom end was tight, and midrange clear with great channel separation. A good cartridge for dull recordings.
  I monitored the VPI and Arion in a couple of different scenarios; first with headphones and then speaker/amp listening. To get a “closeup” listen, I connected a pair of Wireworld Eclipse RCA cables from the VPI to the Arion; another pair of the WW Eclipse’s linked the Arion to a Bryston SHA-1 headphone amp. Headphones included my reference AKG K702 Anniversary, Oppo PM-1 planar magnetic and Shure SRH1840 headphones.
  The second listening setup linked the Arion to a Pass Labs XP-10 line preamp, which was wired to a Rogue Audio Medussa hybrid tube/digital amplifier with the Wireworld Eclipse cables. The amp powered my reference MartinLogan Montis electrostatics, again using premium Wireworld speaker interconnects, a perfect scenario to hear how much air the phono/preamp combo dished out.
The audition
  With the set up complete, I brought out a bunch of albums, plus bought a few new ones for the review. First up was my Wes Montgomery - Full House live concert (circa 1962) half-speed mastered, special-edition LP. This album has that classic Riverside jazz sound — with excellent imaging for its time. The instruments range from the thumb-picked, warm Gibson L5 jazz guitar from the master, as well as saxophone, piano, drums and bass. Love those cymbals. (To sample  an audio snippet from this album, click the player in the sidebar: VPI/Arion Review Demo)
  On my headphone set up, I immediately zeroed on Arion's dynamic range, excellent signal-to-noise, and its ability to relay the bass without bloomy midbass bottom end — a character I have noticed in numerous high-end phono preamps.

                      
Two fantastic LPs to make your vinyl gear sound good

  The Benz cartridge’s natural midrange and top end and just the right amount of air come through in spades from the Full House LP. Man, do I love this album. I actually own and play a two-pickup version of Wes’ guitar through a Fender Twin  Reverb, and I know that tone. The record, VPI arm, Benz cartridge and the Luminous Arion all contribute to make it as real as possible. And the original recording is more than 50 years old!
  The cut “Come Rain or Shine,” a Johnny Mercer composition that is perfect for Wes’ band style, has a very modern jazz combo sound with surprisingly good detail on the L5CES guitar, piano and drum cymbals, considering the recording vintage. And because the vinyl is so damn quiet, you’d swear you were listening to digital. In fact, I dubbed two selections to my Mac computer in 24/96 PCM — via a Benchmark ADC1 A/D. I edited out the lead-in and lead-out’s surface noise, and played back the recordings for several picky audiophiles They swore they were listening to hi-res downloads of the album cuts.

More choice LPs for the Arion/VPI rig

  Switching to classical, I mounted up a brand new copy of the 2013 remaster of the 1953 RCA Red Seal LP Jascha Heifetz/Emmanuel BayBeethoven’s No. 8 and 10 Piano/Violin Sonatas. This mono recording came from the early days of tape, but even lacking stereo, its essential Stradivarius violin tone, with those luscious harmonics — as well as the Steinway piano, shine through this brilliant remaster. Plus the music is being presented by two masters of their instruments.
  The VPI/Benz/Arion trio handled the duos with exquisite class. I don’t know what kind of microphone was used for this early '50s recording (probably a Telefunken or AKG), but the violin textures are amazing, much of the complexity was captured on the tape and this remaster just brings it home.
  Turning to another jazz LP, I clean brushed my 1973 copy of Isao Suzuki Trio/QuartetBlow Up (Three Blind Mice – TBM-2515), which is still in great shape. (Bought it in a hi-fi shop when I was 19). This recording combines elements of classical and jazz — with piano, cello (Mr. Suzuki expertly plays), bass and drums. It has a stripped down, small club concert kind of presentation with a wonderful analog dynamic.

  With the right cartridge, the VPI/Luminous Audio system allows the music’s realness to emerge as much as LP records can. Sure, records don’t have the ultimate dynamic range and low noise of digital, But even by today’s digital standards, this “ancient technology” can still sound damn good!

  I love the sonic textures of the cello and the air around the drum cymbals. Again, the Benz L0.4 mounted on the accurate tracking VPI arm brings this recording to life through the Arion. About as good as I ever have heard this record in 35 years of playing it.
  I have to mention another jazz album that played spot on through this review set up. My beloved Stephan GrappelliUptown Dance (Concord 1978), an under-appreciated record that features Mr. Grappelli and band working with an orchestra. Its Nelson Riddle-like strings, combined with Grappelli’s signature signature tone and supporting band, portrays a lush, detailed soundscape; the strings and solo violins offer up a pleasant, Easy Listening aura that vinyl sweetens even further. Too bad there is no hi-res of this and many other Grappelli releases. I dubbed it to digital to maintain a copy of the record in its best state.
  The VPI/Luminous set up also acquitted itself quite well on pop records. My vintage copy of Michael JacksonThriller received the royal treatment with that throbbing bass line from “Billy Jean,” and 1986’s Dwight YoakumGuitars, Cadillacs, Etc. emerged with that punchy, mix of electric, acoustic guitars, fiddle and steel guitar. The stand out cut is “It Won’t Hurt.”

  Other records that impressed through the VPI/Luminous audio test duo included Flim and The BBs’ first album, which was recorded by Tom Jung on the Sound 80 label and predates his all-digital DMP label by a couple of years.

  Other records that impressed through the VPI/Luminous audio test duo included Flim and The BBs’ first album, which was recorded by Tom Jung on the Sound 80 label and predates his all-digital DMP label by a couple of years. The sessions were recorded in the early days of digital before CD. Thus, the tracks went straight to tape, using an early version of the 3M 16-bit/50.4 kHz digital tape recorder; the master lacquer was cut from the 3M digital tape since the originally planned direct-to-LP disc release fell through because the master lacquer was damaged.
  Flim’s dynamic, percussive jazz tones, judging by this first album, was already well established, and it foreshadowed the highly regarded Tricycle and Big Notes; Flim and the BBs DMP CD releases from 1983 and 1986. The LP’s direct-to-tape energy and dynamics play well via the VPI/Arion phono system. Those high-velocity drums tracked perfectly, and the Benz gave those keyboards and sax tracks a bit of vinyl smoothness.

The verdict
  Since I did this review with four critical components: the turntable/tonearm/Benz cartridge and Luminous Arion phono preamp, you never know, beforehand, how such a phono playback system will synergize. For me, I want an accurate-as-possible dynamic and a low=noise character from a turntable set up. I don’t like warm, musical, laid back, etc. In my music playback. I want it to sound like music. I play guitar. I play the piano; I know what they sound like. The electronics have to be faithful as possible to the real sound character.
  That is the sense that I get from the VPI Scout 1.1 and the Luminous Arion. With the right cartridge, this system allows the music’s realness to emerge as much as LP records can. Sure, records don’t have the ultimate dynamic range and low noise of digital, and they wear out. But I have never abandoned the format — continuously maintaining a turntable (or two) for the last 40 years. Even by today’s digital standards, this “ancient technology” can still sound damn good!
  The Arion is not cheap at $6,395, and the VPI takes some patience to set up, but what you get is a USA-made turntable and preamp that reproduce the music about as good as it gets for under $10,000 (and exceeds many separates that are well above that price).
  If you are a vinyl stalwart with a bit of disposable income, the VPI Scout 1.1 and Luminous Audio Arion are two worthy candidates for purchase. If you are moving up, or even as a first turntable system purchase, it might be the last vinyl system you need to buy. An Everything Audio Network Stellar Sound Award for each component and a nomination for our 2015 Gear of The Year.

***
    John Gatski has been evaluating consumer, audiophile, home cinema and professional audio gear since 1992. In 1995, he created Pro Audio Review, and he has written for Audio, Laserviews, Enjoy The Music, The Audiophile Voice and High Performance Review. Everything Audio Network is based in Kensington, Md. Articles on this site are the copyright of the ©Everything Audio Network. Any unauthorized use, via print or Internet, without written permission is prohibited. John Gatski can be reached via everything.audio@verizon.net 













Audiophile Speaker Review!Paradigm Prestige Series 15BTwo-Way Stand/Shelf Speaker

$
0
0
©Everything Audio Network

Brevis...
Price: $799 each
Likes: accuracy, imaging and size
Dislikes: not a thing, nada, zero
Wow Factor: Big sound/small speaker
by John Gatski
  The last high-end Paradigm small monitor that I reviewed, the Signature S2, was five years ago and, boy, did I gush about that speaker’s finesse. For $1,500 each, I expected the Paradigm S2 stand speaker to excel. And it did.
  The new Prestige 15B sells for half the price, but what you get is a fantastic, accurate, small monitor that exhibits pin-point imaging and exemplary accuracy for a mid-priced speaker. The speaker mixed so well with my amplifiers that I had no hesitation in playing symphonies, loud rock n’ roll, laid-back jazz and classical guitar recordings.
Features
  Priced at $799 each, the small, bookshelf Prestige 15Bs is designed with premium drivers, crossover and cabinet materials. The vented enclosure features a 5.5-inch woofer (Active Ridge Technology overmolded surround, SHOCK-Mount isolation mounting system and 1.5-inch voice coil). The 1-inch, ferro-fluid-cooled HF driver utilizes Paradigm’s PPA Tweeter lens and FEA-optimized pole-piece assembly design to deliver smooth, linear upper-frequency response. The second-order crossover is set at 2 kHz, in my opinion, the optimal frequency for a small two-way.
  The Paradigm Prestige 15B compact small speaker is a serious audiophile speaker designed for small rooms and listening in the near and midfield. Within 10 feet of the listening position, these speakers are extremely articulate with excellent stereo imaging and depth. Many of my reference hi-res tracks were impressively showcased through the Prestige 15B pair.

  The rigid-braced, solid-cabinet construction minimizes unwanted resonances, and the rear port enhances low-bass response — without adding extra mid-bass, a trick many small speakers employ to create more audible bass, but at the expense of accuracy. Not this little Paradigm Prestige 15B; plenty of clean 100 Hz to 60 Hz bass.
Driver/cabinet design
  Paradigm put a lot of effort into making an accurate speaker at a reasonable price with the Prestige line. Key to its balanced performance are the custom drivers and advanced cabinet design, made in house, as well as extensive product testing in Paradigm’s sophisticated anechoic chamber.
  According to Oleg Bogdanov, director of Paradigm Engineering, the tweeter design is paramount to listenable accuracy. “Dome shape plays a major role in sound quality. If the dome radius is too big – i.e. shallow dome - the dome break-up frequency (parts of the dome move out of phase) can be too low and that is well within the human hearing range – 20 Hz to 20 kHz.”
Anatomy of a Prestige Series tweeter

  “This can add coloration to the reproduced sound (octave below 20 kHz limit), which may be perceived as “metallic,” he added. “Therefore, the dome profile needs to be optimized” to sound accurate. Bogdanov emphasized that the Prestige line’s tweeter dome material and treatment are very important considerations as well. “X-PAL uses an anodizing process, which enhances damping properties of the dome — in addition to improving its environmental stability,” he noted.
  Bogdanov also stressed the importance of synergizing woofer and cabinet design to achieve realistic bass reproduction. “We design and build our own drivers for specific applications, such as 15B bookshelf cabinet, and of a very specific size and shape. To achieve smooth and extended bass response, without bumps and troughs, woofer parameters need to fall within a very narrow range. Magnet type and dimensions, voice-coil winding length, wire material, gauge and number of wire turns, flexibility (or, as we call it, compliance) of suspension elements – spider and cone surround, and mass of moving components: all of them must be right.” The cabinet tuning and using correct port diameter and length, as well as the exact amount and placement of very specific damping material, is another critical aspect, according to Bogdanov.
Extensive design/testing for Prestige 15B woofer/midrange

  Bodanov said proper testing is paramount to ensuring the company’s speaker designs are optimized. “Without an accurate measurement system and anechoic chamber, it is hard to verify whether the above considerations bring the desired results,” he explained. “Quasi-anechoic measurements that many other companies are using require splicing of low- and high-frequency measurements, but the accuracy of the method is not sufficient. Our anechoic chamber provides true bass response for most speakers and require small corrections for ultra low frequencies for subwoofers.”
  All that research/design and testing methodology has certainly paid off with the Prestige line’s baby brother speaker. The 15B speaker design boasts a factory response curve of plus, minus 2 dB from 57 Hz to 20 kHz, on-axis. (17 kHz at 30 degrees off-axis). The easy-to-drive, 8 ohm speaker has a listed room sensitivity of 90 dB, 1W/1meter. Maximum input power is 90-watts per speaker.
  "To achieve smooth and extended bass response, without bumps and troughs, woofer parameters need to fall within a very narrow range. Magnet type and dimensions, voice-coil winding length, wire material, gauge and number of wire turns, flexibility (or, as we call it, compliance) of suspension elements – spider and cone surround, and mass of moving components: all of them must be right." 

   The 15B dimensions are (including grille and terminal cups): 12.375-inches tall × 7-inches wide and 10.875-inches deep. Weight is 16 pounds per speaker. They come in separate shipping cartons.
  Per usual with Paradigm, these made-in-Canada speakers are well built and very attractive. Even a picky high-end audiophile will like the aesthetic of this speaker. Cabinet finishes come in Gloss Piano Black, Midnight Cherry, Satin Walnut (the review sample pair) and Satin Black Walnut. The five-way binding posts are easily accessible and the magnet-attached grill makes removal a snap.
  The speaker can be used as a serious audiophile speaker in small rooms, or it can be linked up with other Prestige loudspeakers to form a home cinema speaker system. Buy the 15Bs for surround, along with the tower Prestige 75F, center channel Prestige 45C and Paradigm sub — you got one serious surround system.
A perfect speaker for stand mounting

  I had heard the Prestige at a brief demo at 2015 CES. and I was impressed at how well it held up against its bigger brothers in terms of 80-Hz+ bass, midrange depth and “air” in the treble response. My notes from the show showed several stars — as a reminder that the baby Paradigm speakers had potential. A good small speaker, can be musically satisfying and as accurate as bigger, multi-driver speakers — especially in small-to-medium rooms, where the placement equation becomes easier.
  I have always been a fan of small speakers, like the Paradigm Signature S2 and the Legacy Studio HD, because I can easily integrate them into a room. You can place them closer to walls, easily angle them and perform all sorts of different placement options to get them to sound good. it’s not so easy with big speakers.
The setup
  I set up the Prestige 15B pair in an audiophile stand arrangement — about 10 feet away from my main listener position. The speakers were placed on Apollo speaker stands, which put them right at ear level with my listening position. I toed in the speakers a few degrees and tried them with grills on and off. Since they look good with them on and the grills have minimal audible effect, I left the grills on.
  The speakers were paired with several different amps including two digital amps (Rogue Audio Medusa tube/digital hybrid and the ultra economic 200 wpc Class D Essence DPA-440. I also connected the pint-sized speakers to my heavyweight power amps: a Bryston 14B-SST bipolar output Class AB stereo amp and a Pass Labs X350.5 Class A-A/B MOSFET amp.
Bass port enhances low-end output 

  Preamps included the Coda High Current design, the new Rogue Audio RP-5 tube preamp and the audio feed from an Oppo HA-1’sdiscrete HP-to-line output. Other DACs included Benchmark DAC2-DX and the Mytek Manhattan. Sources included Clear Audio turntable with AT-150ML cartridge, Oppo BDP-105 and a Dell Venue 8 tablet with USB Audio Player Pro, which allowed me to play up to 24-bit/384 music without cluttering up the space with a computer. I mounted the tablet via a clamp to a mic stand and set it next to my Ikea listening chair.
  Speakers on hand were Legacy Studio HD stand speakers, my reference electrostatic MartinLogan Montis, Pass Labs SR-2 three-way towers and Westlake LC 8.1 two-way stand speakers. All speakers were cabled with Wireworld Equinox cables. Line components also were linked via Wireworld cables. Essential Sound Products Essence II Reference power cords and passive power strip linked the components to the AC.
  Since the Prestige 15B speakers were brand spanking new, I “burned“ them in for three days via test tones and multi-plays of symphonic music.
The audition
  First up was the Warren BernhardtSo Real SACD, recorded by Tom Jung in 1999 for the DMP label. The drum cymbals on “Autumn Leaves” are some of the most accurate ever recorded and there is lot of “musical space“ between the drums, piano and bass from this live-to-DSD recording. A good set of speakers evokes the studio space impression of this recording and can present the realistic drum cymbal sheen without being brittle.
  The 15Bs really nailed the cymbals, and the metal dome tweeter maintained a smoothness that is surprising for this price class. Instrument location, in width and depth within the stereo image, also impressed me. For a two-way, these speakers are very articulate.
  The speakers lack the deepest bass, but there is enough 50 Hz to 80 Hz bass that it does not seem bass shy with most music. On stands in the middle of the room, my RTA revealed relatively flat bass response to 60 Hz. And the bass is clean. Adding a subwoofer can get you more low bass if you want it, but I would not call these speakers bass shy.
  The 15Bs also emerged as a winner. The smoothness of the crossover and the lack of stridency in the tweeter made for pleasurable listening sessions with the Dire Straits — Brothers in Arms DVD-A (24/48) and The Rolling Stones — Some Girls Deluxe Edition hi-res reissue (24/88.2).

  Turning to classical music, I played the Mercury Living Presence SACD reissue of Janos Starker — Bach: The Complete Cello Suites. The little two-ways filled up the room with a convincing presentation of those wonderful cello string harmonics and such spacious imaging for a single instrument. As per other good speakers I have listened with this disc, I could hear the subtle background noises of the recording: chair squeak, breathing, etc.
  The crossover/driver synergy makes this an easy speaker to listen to solo instruments. Its sound is not too forward or too recessed. The cello’s bass oomph was not quite as deep as the much bigger Pass speakers or the MLs active subwoofer, but the 15B’s satisfactorily reproduced the essential mid-bass tones.
  On Pop and Rock recordings, the 15Bs also emerged as a winner. The smoothness of the crossover and the lack of stridency in the tweeter made for pleasurable listening sessions with the Dire StraitsBrothers in Arms DVD-A (24/48) and The Rolling StonesSome Girls Deluxe Edition hi-res reissue (24/88.2). The “Money for Nothing” power chord punch shines on this speaker even though the bass is not as big as with larger speakers. And on the Stones’ Some Girls Deluxe Edition, those marvelous bonus tracks kicked butt through the 15Bs. I particularly liked the Country-Rock tinged “Don’t Be A Stranger” and “Do You Think I Really Care.” The bonus tracks are some of the best-sounding Stones recordings ever made, and the Prestige 15Bs certainly did them justice.
Fit fore a pro
  Because of the 15Bs’ compact size, yet accuracy persona, I could not resist putting them into my home recording suite. Though not self-powered as most pro speakers are these days, the Prestige 15Bs made for an excellent nearfield monitor.
 Because of the 15Bs’ compact size, yet accuracy persona, I could not resist putting them into my home recording suite. Though not self-powered as most pro speakers are these days, the Prestige 15Bs made for an excellent nearfield monitor.

  I did numerous editing sessions with the little Paradigms. The system consisted of a Mac computer, linking its USB output to a Benchmark DAC2-DX DAC, which fed its variable line output to a Pass XA-30 Class A MOSFET amp and the Prestige 15Bs. Other than lacking full, under 50-Hz bass, this speaker is more accurate than many of the popular small pro speakers that are used today in the home recording world. Paradigm should make a powered version of this speaker, call it Prestige Pro 15B and get it into musician/pro audio dealers. It’s that good!

The verdict
  The Paradigm Prestige 15B compact small speaker is a serious audiophile speaker designed for small rooms and listening in the near and midfield. Within 10 feet of the listening position, these speakers are extremely articulate with excellent stereo imaging and depth. Many of my reference hi-res tracks were impressively showcased through the Prestige 15B pair; many tracks sounded as good as through some $8,000 speakers I have tested.
  The little Paradigms lack the bottom octave of deep bass (hey, it's a single 5.5-inch woofer in a small cabinet) but the 15B has good, honest bass down 55-60 Hz — and without the mid-bass bloat of lesser, small monitors. I can’t think of one negative about these speakers. One big Stellar Sound Award for a pair of impressive, small speakers.
  John Gatski has been evaluating consumer, audiophile, home cinema and professional audio gear since 1992. In 1995, he created Pro Audio Review, and he has written for Audio, Laserviews, Enjoy The Music, The Audiophile Voice and High Performance Review. Everything Audio Network is based in Kensington, Md. Articles on this site are the copyright of the ©Everything Audio Network. Any unauthorized use, via print or Internet, without written permission is prohibited. John Gatski can be reached via everything.audio@verizon.net 







Home Theater Review!Onkyo TX-NR737Dolby Atmos-Ready7.2 Channel Receiver

$
0
0
©Everything Audio Network

Brevis...
Price: $899 retail, $499 street
Likes: good sound, DSD,  great price
Dislikes: no Airplay audio playback
Wow Factor: bang for the buck leader
More info: Onkyo TX-NR737

by Russ Long
  I reviewed Onkyo’s flagship receiver, the TX-NR5010, two years ago and after spending time with the more affordable (list price: $899 — $500 street) TX-NR737, a 7.2-channel Dolby Atmos-ready Network AV receiver, I’m convinced that regardless of the price point, Onkyo does it right. All of Onkyo’s receiver models, including the TX-NR737, now boast HDMI 2.0 making the TX-NR737 the perfect affordable companion to a 4K display.Features

Features
  The 25.4-pound TX-NR737 measures 17.1″W x 6.9″H x 15.6″D and provides 110 watts per channel. To boost performance, the front and center channels utilize discrete three-stage inverted Darlington Circuitry amplification. The 4K/60 Hz-capable HDMI 2.0 inputs are perfectly suited for Ultra-HD gaming and video at 60 fps, as well as support for HDCP 2.2 (a nice feature since several Hollywood film studios are adopting HDCP 2.2 copy protection for future Full HD and 4K releases).
  Qdeo 4K upscaling technology is also included, allowing the user to enjoy older DVDs and games in high resolution. Hi-Res music lovers will enjoy the TX-R737 as it has the ability to stream almost any 192/24 hi-res, lossless, or compressed file format (including 5.6 MHz DSD) from compatible network- attached devices using built-in Wi-Fi or via Onkyo Remote App 2, Onkyo’s free remote app that is available for both Android and iOS devices.

Onkyo's Well-Priced Dolby Atmos Receiver

  The app also plays a large role in multi-zone audio configurations, as you can easily hook up another small system located in another room utilizing the Zone 2 speaker terminals and then use the “Whole House Mode” to play the same track in all zones, or assign a specific source to each zone. The TX-NR737 also includes Bluetooth (version 2.1 EDR) making music streaming from a wireless device easy. Unfortunately there is no AirPlay support so Apple TV is still required for easy streaming from an iPhone or iPad.
  The TX-NR737’s rear panel includes six HDMI inputs and two HDMI outputs, which is more than enough connectivity for most configurations. Five of the HDMI inputs support HDMI 2.0 connections — meaning that all the HD media sources can potentially provide full 4K resolution at 50/60 fps. The HDMI Main output supports Audio Return Channel and is compatible with HDCP 2.2. This is important as it provides the ability to view upcoming 4K content from TV broadcasts and other sources that incorporates DRM copy protection. The third HDMI input port, which is designated for a DVR or set-top box, also includes this compatibility.
  The receiver has limited some of the connectivity offered by its more expensive siblings to keep the unit affordable but there is more than enough connectivity to facilitate most configurations: seven Audio/Video Inputs, one Audio-only Input, one Component Video Input, one Component Video Monitor Output, one Optical Digital Input, two Coaxial Digital inputs, two Subwoofer Outputs, one Ethernet Port, one USB Connection and even a Phono Input.

 With the TX-NR737, Onkyo has proven that it can deliver a feature-packed, non-compromising receiver at an affordable price. The unit sounds impressive, and its dual 32-bit processing engines allow it to easily handle hi-res audio, including 5.6 MHz DSD, making it a perfect option for audiophiles and high-res audio enthusiasts.

  The TX-NR737 is simple to navigate, a single-knob provides master volume control and a row of buttons along the middle of the receiver provides easy switching between inputs. A front-panel mounted MHL-equipped HDMI port appropriately accepts signal from any HDMI equipped device. If you’re not familiar with MHL, it stands for Mobile High-definition Link, and it is a specification that provides connectivity for connecting smart phones, tablets, and other devices to an HDTV, while simultaneously powering and charging the device. It supports 1080p video and 7.1-channel digital multi-channel audio, and it also carries control data allowing the TV remote to control the connected device. Even with MHL support, the TX-NR737’s Wi-Fi integration is a God-send, as it allows the user to enjoy streaming services such as Spotify, TuneIn, Deezer, etc. to be accessed without having to rely on a mobile phone or tablet.
  The TX-NR737 fully supports Atmos. If you have a pre-Atmos version of the receiver, Atmos support is simple and free via a firmware upgrade via thumb-drive or directly from the web. My review unit was a pre-Atmos, so I had to upgrade the firmware, which I found extremely simple. The receiver utilizes dual 32-bit DSP engines to decode and scale Dolby Atmos to the user’s home theater configuration, providing a much larger multi-dimensional sound listening experience with as many as 10 speakers. A Dolby surround up-mixer algorithm provides for current channel-based content that has not been mixed for Atmos (including 5.6 MHz DSD) to be expanded to fill a Dolby Atmos configuration.

The Setup
  The bulk of my testing was done utilizing the Onkyo TX-NR737 along with a 5.1 configuration of Episode 700 Series speakers (2 x ES-700-MON-6, 1 x EX-700-LCR-5, 2 x ES-500-SAT-4, and 1 x ES-SUB-12-300). My standard setup includes the ES-700-MON-6 speakers on a pair of 18” speaker stands with the ES-700-LCR-5 at the same height, mounted just below a Sony KDL-46EX640 LCD TV. The ES-500-SAT-4’s are mounted slightly higher at 36.” All five tweeters are focused at the listening position. The entire Episode speaker system, with the exception of the ES-SUB-12-300 powered sub was powered with the TX-NR737. Playback was primarily via the Pioneer Elite BDP-53FD Blu-ray player, Sony BDP-N460 Blu-ray Player, USB thumb drive and an Apple iPhone 6.

The Audition
  Before any listening or viewing, I calibrated my system using the AccuEQ Room Calibration utility, which was easy and straightforward to use. I used my staple pallet of evaluation material to test the receiver’s audio performance and ease of use. This includes Hi-Res music sources: Pink Floyd -Dark Side of the Moon, James Taylor - Hourglass, and Elton John - Goodbye Yellow Brick Road SACDs and a wide variety of DVD-A discs including The Beach Boys - Pet Sounds and The Beatles - Love.

Fewer connections, less-cluttered back panel

  I was thoroughly impressed with the receiver’s performance and sound quality. I used my MacBook Pro running Audacity to playback several high-res albums including James Taylor - JT, Roxy Music - Avalon and Dire Straits - Brothers in Arms and, again, was pleased with the results. The receiver utilizes TI Burr-Brown D/A conversion that make lossless formats (FLAC, WAV and ALAC) really shine. As was the case with the Onkyo TX-NR5010 that I reviewed in 2013, I found the Onkyo TX-NR737 to be perfectly suited for music playback.
  Moving onto movies, I auditioned Blu-ray discs of Hugo, Ratatouille, The Dark Knight and Hard Days Night and in each instance the TX-NR737 did a wonderful job reproducing the film’s audio tracks. These four films are among my favorites in regards to audio performance and they each translated beautifully with the TX-NR737. In fact, the sonic signature is similar to the flagship NR-5010, with a touch less finesse on the top when played at the loudest, listenable levels

The verdict
  With the TX-NR737, Onkyo has proven that it can deliver a feature-packed, non-compromising receiver at an affordable price. The unit sounds impressive, and its dual 32-bit processing engines allow it to easily handle hi-res audio, including 5.6 MHz DSD making it a perfect option for audiophiles and high-res audio enthusiasts. This audio engines also shines in the home theater realm, offering great value for its connectivity/sound and video quality, plus it is Atmos-ready. We don’t see many well under-$1,000 receivers we like but this one is a winner. An Everything Audio Network Stellar Sound Award winner that is.

  An avid home theater and audiophile listener, Russ Long makes his living as a Nashville-based professional audio engineer, who has recorded hundreds of albums for various artists, including Grammy Award winner Sixpence None The Richer. Articles on this site are the copyright of the ©Everything Audio Network. Any unauthorized use, via print or Internet, without written permission is prohibited.




Home/Live Recording!Audix MB5050 MicroBoom Mount,M1250B Cardioid Condenser Microphone

$
0
0
"Perfect For Live Capture And Recording Choral Groups"
©Everything Audio Network

Brevis...
Price: $599 retail
Likes: stealth-like, good sounding mic
Dislikes: lacks separate stereo mount
Wow Factor: a staple for choir miking
More info: MB5050 Microboom

by Richard Alan Salz
  When the MB5050 Microboom™ System form Audix showed up at my door the first thing that came to mind was that someone had sent me a piece of artwork that was rolled up in a cardboard poster tube!. As I opened up the tube I said, hold on a second, I didn’t order a fishing rod!
  All kidding aside, the MB5050 System is an amazingly versatile microphone accessory/small diaphragm mic setup that I’ve found many uses for in the time that I used it on my studio and out in the field.
Features
  The MB5050 MicroBoom with Audix M1250B Cardioid Condenser Microphone, priced at $599 retail, should be thought of as a modular system — in that it combines a 50-inches long, carbon-fiber microphone boom (with integrated internal wiring) and a microphone preamp/capsule. The included conversion cable is a must — as the output from the boom (and connection to the M1250B) is a mini-XLR.
  Various options are available with regards to the MicroBoom system, including a choice of 24- 50- or 84-inch booms, and microphone capsules of varying sensitivities. The overall fit and finish is up to the usual Audix standard — which in this era of cost cutting, outsourcing, and general de-contenting of products — is truly welcome. It fits on standard mic stand attachment configurations
Audio gets great sound from a small mic

  Without actually holding the cardioid (uni-directional) microphone body/capsule in your hand, it’s hard to emphasize just how small it actually is at just over two inches long and about the same diameter as an AAA battery! That said, it doesn’t feel fragile and should stand everyday usage by a professional. It should be noted that this small microphone also houses the mic preamp circuitry, something that is usually provided as a separate module for a condenser mic of this size.
  Specs include a frequency response of 50 Hz - 19 kHz (no tolerance listed), 150 ohms output impedance. The M1250B sensitivity is listed at 10 mV/Pa (C) @ 1k10 mV/Pa (HC). Signal/Noise Ratio (A-weighted) is 73 dB. Equivalent Noise Level (A-weighted) is 21 dB. The maximum SPL is greater than 140 dB.
Reeling in the tones…
  The usage scenarios of the MB system are many, but the main takeaway is that the MB system excels when you need full range sound in a nearly invisible form factor. The classic example of this kind of usage is, of course, a vocal chorus. Nobody wants to see a pair of AKG 414’s, or even traditional pencil-shaped, small-diaphragm condensers hanging down to (or rising up from) the stage or pulpit area. The form factor of the MB5050 renders it virtually invisible to the audience, and its incognito appearance makes it non-intimidating to talent, especially that of the less-seasoned variety.
  Additionally, the MicroBoom system because of its super maneuverability can simply fit places that no ordinary microphone can. Think the tiny gap between high-hat stand and snare drum, or buried deep in the strings of a John Cage-style prepared piano!
In Use
  I pressed the MB5050 system into use both in the studio and in live sound applications, and really liked what I heard. The sonics of the MB5050 are not going to match the tone of a vintage Neuman KM184 or a Schoeps, but the overall package pricing is but a fraction of those microphone’s cost — and let’s face it — you would not want to put those mics in “danger” of being damaged in the same way you’d put a modern microphone like the Audix. And ultimately, the sound of the tiny Audix MB mic is quite good.
Audix's Cliff Castle: "MB has become staple for choir miking"

  Used during a Bluegrass concert, the MB5050 system turned out to be just the trick for bringing the sound of a fiddle player’s vintage German instrument up in the house system — without drawing unwanted attention to itself, or sounding shrill and unnatural in the way that a bridge transducer might. With just a little bit of attention paid to the positioning and gain-staging, we had no problem with unwanted feedback, and the microphone seemed pretty tolerant with respect to the player moving around during the show.
  As a test, I brought the MB5050 system to my son’s school to see how it would do during their Christmas concert to provide a little bit of spot highlighting for the soloists as they came forward on the stage. Once again, the MB5050 (this time hung from the lighting grid) worked really well, and its matte-black finish and small size was not distracting to the performers or audience. This shouldn’t be surprising, as the MB5050 system has become a favorite for the worship market.
   Used during a Bluegrass concert, the MB5050 system turned out to be just the trick for bringing the sound of a fiddle player’s vintage German instrument up in the house system — without drawing unwanted attention to itself, or sounding shrill and unnatural.

  Back in the studio, the MB5050 found all sorts of interesting roles, ranging from overhead microphone to capturing the player’s perspective at the drum set. It would have been even better to have had a pair since the microphone’s 140-dB maximum SPL could allow some high volume recording for stereo work..
  I found the MB5050 to be relatively quiet (for a small diaphragm condenser microphone) and fairly balanced in its response (within limits). This is not the microphone for recording a baritone vocalist doing a radio spot, but neither is it peaky or unpleasant.
  I had good success threading the MB5050 into the depths of the back of a Fender silverface Quad Reverb amplifier (mounted in a Super Twin cabinet…don’t ask!) in order to capture the backwave from the JBL speakers. No matter how loud the amp was, the MB5050 did not appear to break up at all, and it was amazing how different the sound was — just by moving the microphone a few inches within the cabinet.
  The MB5050 system shined on percussion instruments, having a clean and focused presentation of triangle, shaker, and cabasa. I liked it less on cowbell, feeling like I needed a microphone with more bottom end response. Still, it did okay.
The verdict
  The Audix MB5050 MicroBoom system could easily find a home in most studios and in virtually all live sound venues. The MB system is a natural to serve for choir duties. It also works well for gentle amplification (or recording duties) in a praise band setting. According to Audix VP Cliff Castle, the MicroBoom Series is quite popular for miking choirs and other vocals music setups, due to its quality microphone and unobtrusive mount. Church choirs are big customers of the MB system.

  Though not a budget mic/mount system, the excellent fit and finish, versatility, and great sound make the MB5050 MicroBoom system a great choice for live sound reinforcement and recording studio usage! It deserves the Everything Audio NetworkStellar Sound Award for the mic’s sound quality, and the usefulness, versatility and quality of the build.
  Richard Alan Salz is a musician, recording/live sound engineer and the president of On-Site Acoustic Testing, based in headquartered in Vermont. He also has massed a collection of 30+ guitars and several collectible classic guitar amplifiers. He can be reached at his email: sales@onsiteacoustictesting.com. Articles on this site are the copyright of the ©Everything Audio Network. Any unauthorized use, via print or Internet, without written permission is prohibited.

Audiophile Headphone Review!Audeze EL-8 Planar MagneticOpen-Back Stereo Headphone"Stylish Look, Smooth PM Sonics"

$
0
0
Brevis...
Price: $699 retail
Likes: smooth treble, rich midrange
Dislikes: proprietary cable connector
Wow Factor: snazzy look, smooth sonics
More info: Audeze EL-8

by John Gatski
  Over the past few years, Audeze has made a name for itself in the hi-fi headphone community. Using planar magnetic ribbon technology, their high-end phones have garnered critical praise, and now their mid-priced HPs, the EL-8, is making some noise as well.
  Priced at $699, the EL8 is the company’s entry hi-fi headphone. The LCD Series, such as the LCD-3, range in price from $995 to $1,945. The entry-point EL-8, besides costing less is a versatile headphone that can work with not only high-end headphone amps, but also portable audio players, including the proliferating hi-res player. As a result the EL-8 is more compact and lighter weight than its costlier siblings.
  The EL-8‘s key design feature is the planar magnetic driver, which offers a smooth, even response — without peakiness in the treble. Planar magnetic speakers and headphones also project a wide and deep sense of space that is perfect for headphone listening.

Features
  Planar magnetic design has been around for about 40 years. It is basically a hybrid design utilizing the principle of magnetic speaker design and electromagnetics. Like a dynamic headphone — with their standard magnet drivers — planar magnetic headphones use a magnetic field that surrounds a conductor, which has an electrical current flowing through it to drive the speaker diaphragm. Like an electrostatic driver, PM designs utilize a diaphragm consisting of a thin sheet of flexible transparent film. Additionally, the PM differs from the electrostatic by using thin, flat electrical conductors to charge the diaphragm. In my opinion, the proper implementation of planar magnetic technology in headphone creates an audio texture similar to what i hear in top-class, ribbon speakers and ribbon microphones: a smooth treble, rich midrange and good bass, combined with a spacious stereo image.
 The Audeze is a very good sounding, entry point, planar magnetic headphone that can be used as a HQ headphone for portable players, smartphones, tablets, etc., but also it fits right in as a budget audiophile set of 'phones.
  The EL-8 is an open, circumaural-type stereo PM headphone with individually adjustable ear pieces. Unlike other PM ‘phones I have auditioned, the EL-8 is not heavy, weighing in at 460 grams. The ear pads are plush and soft, as is the headband. Quite a comfortable ‘phone. The EL-8 comes standard with proprietary flat cables with a four-conductor end that slides into each ear piece. The device end terminates into a standard 1/8th-inch stereo plug; a 1/4-inch adapter is included. Optional cables are available for iPhone, Astell & Kern, Pono and Sony PHA-3 player are available.
  The drivers are planar magnetic utilizing Fluxor™ technology neodymium magnetics. Each driver measures 100 mm. Factory specs include a 10Hz-50kHz frequency response, no tolerance listed; 101 dB/1-mW efficiency, and a maximum level of 130dB. Maximum power handling is listed at 15 watts (very short duration of 200 m/sec), but a suggested range is 200 mW to 4 watts. The impedance is 30 ohms.
  According to Audeze, several innovations contribute to the EL-8's sound quality:
•Patent-pending Fazor technology, introduced in the LCD Collection, are special acoustical elements positioned on either side of the magnetic structure in each transducer that enhance transparency by influencing sound waves generated by large planar diaphragms. Benefits include extended frequency response, improved high-frequency extension, better phase response, and lowered distortion resulting in more realistic imaging.
•Fluxor™ Magnetic Structure — With new, patent-pending Fluxor magnetic technology, introduced in the EL-8, Audeze delivers nearly double the magnetic flux density or driving power of the highest-grade neodymium magnets. This  achievement is said to result in reduced weight with greater efficiency to play easily with mobile devices.
•Uniforce™ Diaphragms — The EL-8’s patent-pending Uniforce diaphragm features variable trace widths on the voice-coil that captures variations in the magnetic field in the gaps between the magnets thus equalizing the force of individual traces. This creates a uniform driving force across the diaphragm surface for dramatically reduced distortion, higher resolution and improved imaging.
  The snazzy, modern-shape aesthetic of the Audeze EL-8 headphone was done by BMW Designworks USA. And they did their job well. This is one of the best looking headphones that I have seen in a while.

The setup
  I tested the EL-8 with several headphone amp/DACs, two standalone analog headphone amps and four portable hi-res players. Music ranged from Pop to Rock and Classical and Jazz. Equipment included Oppo HA-1 headphone amp/DAC, Benchmark DAC 2-DX HP amp/DAC, Mytek Manhattan DAC/HP amp, and the portable Resonessence Concero HP amp/DAC. The standalone, non-DAC units included Rogue Audio’s new RP-5 tube audiophile preamp and the Bryston BHA-1 class-A headphone amp. Source music included hi-res downloads from HDTracks, Acoustic Sounds, my own hi-res recordings and some premium vinyl, which was played through a Clearaudio turntable, and the Rogue Audio RP 5 phono pre and the preamp’s built-in headphone amp.
  All components were linked through Wireworld line-level interconnects. Headphones included the EL-8, Sony MDR0-7510, AKG K702 Anniversary, Shure SRH-1840, Oppo PM-1 and PM-2 planar magnetic headphones.
Portable hi-res DAC/player iBasso DX-90 and EL-8
  Before I did any serious listening, I let the EL-8’s stew for a four day break-in with moderate level music and test tones run through the headset. Then it was time to seriously listen to these headphones.
  First up was a lengthy session with the EL-8s and the Benchmark DAC-2 DX, the successor to the DAC-2D (adds AES/EBU connection). Fed from an Oppo BDP-105 line out to the Benchmark’s line-in, I first auditioned the direct-to-DSD recording Anthony Wilson Trio - Our Gang (Groovenote SACD). The warm jazz guitar/Hammond organ/drum kit’s aural presentation has a detailed image with good spacing of the three instruments.
  The EL-8s relayed the album with a velvety richness in the guitar and organ, with a smooth, laid-back percussion character. Compared to the AKG-K702 Anniversary, the top end is not as bright, which I expected as the AKG is a conventional driver headphone.
  The EL-8 does brings the sound closer to the ear without the audio sounding exaggerated. Although it costs $500 more than the EL-8, I compared the Audeze to the Oppo PM-1 planar magnetic headphone. There is a somewhat similar richness in the midrange, but the PM-1 (and its $899 sibling PM-2) sounded a bit brighter in the top-end.
  Switching to Classical music, this is where I think the EL-8s really showed their character. On Janos StarkerBach’s Complete Cello Suites (Mercury Living Presence SACD), the vibrant, gorgeous cello tone from Mr. Starker was firmly out in front. Similarly, Jascha Heifetz’s RCA Red Seal recording of Brahms Violin Concerto was showcased in a strong presentation of the master’s rich, Stradivarius tone. These budget PM headphones really do shine on Classical and Acoustic music.
  On Pop and Rock music, the EL-8 has a smooth character and does not go crazy with bass boost that many headphones are engineered with these days. Again, the top end is not as bright as some of my conventional driver headphones, but on some types of music that is a welcome attribute, as modern Pop often is overly bright.
  On the high end DAC/HP combos and the audiophile HP amps, my conclusions were pretty consistent. Since the EL-8 is targeted to portable devices, I plugged into several hi-res portable players including the Astell & Kern Kern AK-100 and iBasso DX-90 and the TASCAM HA-P90SD, as well as the Oppo HA-2 portable DAC HP/amp HTC android phone player.
The EL-8's good looks, courtesy of BMW Designworks USA
  As with the audiophile gear, the EL-8 matched up well with the portables. Despite the phone’s low impedance, all the devices could adequately drive the Audeze to loud levels without audible clipping.
  Pairing the EL-8 and the iBasso DX-90 portable, with its ESS Sabre mobile DAC chip set, I heard a nice, detailed, rich soundscape with that aforementioned close-up focus on the midrange that I had heard through audiophile gear. The EL-8 does not have the high-end finesse of the upper end Audeze or the $1,200 Oppo PM-1, but then again it’s at a much lower price-point and positioning than those premium ‘phones. For the bucks, it’s mighty good and very comfortable. As a portable package, it was not a hard decision to pack the EL-8 and a portable player for a day at the beach.

The verdict
  The Audeze is a very good sounding, entry point, planar magnetic headphone that can be used as a HQ headphone for portable players, smartphones, tablets, etc., but also it fits right in as a budget audiophile set of 'phones. Easy to drive, comfy, available with various cable options and can be ordered as a closed-back for a bit more isolation or as the open headphone tested here. Overall, it earns the Everything Audio Network Stellar Sound Award.
 John Gatski has been evaluating consumer, audiophile, home cinema and professional audio gear since 1992. In 1995, he created Pro Audio Review, and he has written for Audio, Laserviews, Enjoy The Music, The Audiophile Voice and High Performance Review. Everything Audio Network is based in Kensington, Md. Articles on this site are the copyright of the ©Everything Audio Network. Any unauthorized use, via print or Internet, without written permission is prohibited. John Gatski can be reached via everything.audio@verizon.net 









Audiophile Review!Benchmark AHB2 Stereo Amplifier,Exclusive Benchtest!

$
0
0

Exclusive First Benchtest!
Click Here

Brevis...
Price: $2,995
Likes: super smooth and open
Dislikes: not big and heavy
Wow Factor! 130+ dB SNR
More info: Benchmark AHB2


 by John Gatski
  Following my initial first listen to groundbreaking Benchmark’s AHB2 amplifier late last year, I finally got production samples in July and got a chance to do more in-depth listening in stereo — and in a multichannel setup. EAN also performed a series of lab measurements to verify the amazing numbers claimed by the manufacturer — especially signal to noise.
Features
  The $2,995 AHB2 stereo amplifier was designed in conjunction with THX. It features a bipolar-output power section, 180 WPC output RMS, (350W bridged mono), balanced XLR input, three-way input sensitivity switch and dual speaker input options: binding posts and Speakon, a professional termination that uses a twist-on connecter. The AHB2 is housed in a compact enclosure that measures only two times a DAC2 (11" W x 9"D to back of connector x 3 7/8"H). This is not your typical hi-fi sized amplifier.
  The AHB2‘s key highlight is the extremely low noise and distortion. Distortion at .0001% and signal-to-noise/dynamic range measured at more than 130 dB!!!! That is digital-like specs from an analog amplifier, and a source of pride for co-designer and Benchmark VP John Siau.

The AHB2 design
“It was my goal to create a power amplifier that matched the performance of the DAC2 D/A converter,” Siau explained. “After all, the performance of the D/A converter is only useful — if it can be delivered by the downstream power amplifier.”


Note the addition of the input sensitivity switch


  Siau said that the amp has exceeded his expectations — in terms of measured performance. The SNR of the AHB2 was spec'd at 130 dB (A-weighted) and THD is -115 dB, just about as good as the DAC2’s measurements. “The AHB2 power amplifier was designed from the ground up to deliver the full performance of the DAC2 HGC," he emphasized.
  In order to achieve the new amp specs, Siau utilized THX amplifier design concepts, but he also designed his own signal path design in order to get these impressive numbers and audiophile-accurate audio signatures. Siau said the following design highlights enabled Benchmark to create the AHB2’s “fantastic” performance signature: 
 •Low gain (9 dB). This allows +22 dBu input at amplifier clip, which is essential for low noise;
•Patented feed-forward error correction, which virtually eliminates crossover distortion, a problem, Siau says, is still common among typical amplifier designs;
•The feed-forward design also makes bias currents unnecessary, and non-critical. Thus, Class B operation is possible with very low distortion;
•The multiple bipolar output stages are run in parallel to eliminate crossover distortion; one output stage is active, while another is in the crossover region;
•The Class AB output stage uses very low bias current. (Due to low bias currents, idle power consumption is only 20 watts.);

 The Warren Bernhardt recording’s dynamic range is vast, and the AHB2 showcased its dynamics — with a live, accurate, musical portrait of the album, wrapped in a stunning smoothness. The transients were dead-on accurate — without the shrillness I often hear in bipolar amps.

•The feed-forward design even makes the more efficient Class H or G operation possible — with no rise in distortion at class H or G switch point (Class H, or G, rail switching at a 1/3 power threshold);
•A tightly regulated power supply — with high-bandwidth control loop on the switch-mode power supply — responds to amplifier loading over the entire audio band, and at ultrasonic frequencies;
•The amplifier does not rely on capacitive energy storage, and the switch-mode power supply eliminates AC line magnetic interference to levels not possible with a linear power supply;
•The AHB2’s greater than 200 kHz bandwidth allows it to achieve excellent inter-channel phase at 20 kHz and greater-than-0.1 Hz low-frequency cutoff is said to minimize low-frequency phase shift;
•The feed-forward design also improves damping factor for improved bass response, and the PCB uses balanced star-quad signal and power supply distribution to minimize magnetic interference.
•Siau said that certain THX design elements allow him to make the amp as efficient as possible, but the AHB2 design was optimized for low distortion and low noise.
  “It was not optimized for the highest possible efficiency that could be achieved with the new THX topology,” Siau explained. “Nevertheless the AHB2 is much more efficient than a conventional Class AB design. Peak power does not vary with AC line voltage (due to the regulated supply). Likewise, power drawn on one channel does not influence the power available from the other channel.”
  Though the AHB2 utilizes a switching power supply, Siau explained that the overall amp design is not a “switcher.” “The AHB2 is a linear amplifier, it is not a switcher,” he noted. “For this reason, it produces very little out-of-band noise. The A-weighted noise is only 2 dB less than noise measured over an 80 kHz bandwidth. This was an important design goal because ultrasonic noise can be folded into the audio band by the non-linearities in speaker transducers.”


Premium parts, laid out nice and tidy.
Click here  for full benchtest


  The omission of the unbalanced input was intentional, according to Siau. You can use unbalanced sources with the AHB2 (the amp’s 2V and 4V sensitivity settings provide full compatibility with unbalanced sources), but you need adapter cables so that the balanced receiver can connect differentially to the RCA jack at the source device. Pin 2 is wired to the RCA hat, pin 3 is wired to the RCA ground.
  This back-referencing is essential for establishing a low-noise connection over a 2V interface. “The omission of the RCA jack is intentional. It forces the user to use a back-referenced connector cable to establish a balanced connection between the RCA output and the XLR input,” Siau said.
  He noted that the 2V RCA unbalanced output utilized by countless hi-fi equipment impedes high resolution playback performance. Siau claims that most unbalanced 2V outputs struggle to exceed an SNR that is better than 100 dB, and very few unbalanced outputs will come anywhere close to reaching 130 dB SNR, He noted that the Benchmark DAC2 series approaches 130 dB SNR via its unbalanced analog output, due to use of a low-impedance voltage divider (pad).

Like the Benchmark D/As and A/D, the company believes that great measurements correlate to great sound. In the case of the AHB2 I totally agree.

  Though he insists the balanced output/input path is the way to maximize noise performance from a hi-fi component, Siau said that Benchmark has “put considerable effort into overcoming the limitations of 2V unbalanced inputs. The input amplifier on the AHB2 has very low equivalent input noise. We can deliver the full performance of the AHB2 over a 2V unbalanced interface, but only if the source impedance is low. Johnson noise will degrade the performance if the source impedance is too high. The special unbalanced-to-balanced input cable rejects hum that can be introduced by traditional unbalanced connections.”

Production sample review
  For a more thorough sonic and user impression, I spent several weeks with the production version AHB2s. Since my late 2013 audition of the prototype, Siau had tweaked the performance even more before sending me the review samples. He was able to get even better specs in the final version, with S/N exceeding -130 dB. He also assured me that the slightly forward midbass that I heard during the prototype listening sessions is no longer there; the prototype had an out-of-spec part, according to Siau. And that statement indeed is true; the bass on the production versions was tight and clean.

The set up
  For my stereo testing, I auditioned a single AHB2 in a number of audio scenarios, including a two-channel audiophile amplifier, and as a multichannel hi-res audio system at a trade show demo (after receiving two additional amps from Benchmark). I also put the amp into my home recording system, using the AHB2 to power a pair of Bryston Mini-Ts and Legacy Studio speakers.
  In the audiophile system, I mated the AHB2 with several speaker sets including my reference MartinLogan Montis electrostatics, Pass Labs SR-1 three-way tower, the Bryston Mini-Ts, and Legacy Expressions, a two-way tower (review upcoming). Associated equipment included Coda line-stage preamp, Oppo BDP-105 universal player, Benchmark DAC2-D D/A, Mytek Stereo192-DSD D/A, Oppo HA-1 discrete HP amp-D/A. A Dell Venue 8 tablet also was used as a hi-res digital player, via USB Audio Player Pro software — up to 24/384.


Note the size compared to a DAC2


  All connecting cables were furnished by Wireworld, and I connected all three-prong power cord components to the AC withEssential Sound Products (ESP) Essence IIpower cords and their Essence power strip.
  After a few days of break in, I employed the AHB2 into my audiophile system with the PASS SR-1 speakers. The AHB2 is a simple amp to operate. It contains a simple on/off front-panel switch, and rear-panel sensitivity selector switch and bridge mono switch.
  As mentioned, the production version is equipped with the pro-spec Speakon, twist-locking speaker cable connecters, as well as normal binding posts. The Speakon option is due to Benchmark’s new speaker, SMS1, that comes with that connector. According to Benchmark, the Speakon connector option ensures the best connection for a speaker/amp union and is more resistant to terminal oxidation, which degrades amp performance to speakers over time. (Siau said the Speakon also has lower distortion, according to his measurements.
  However, the Benchmark speaker is the only audiophile speaker that I know of with the Speakon connector, thus, this amp’s connecter may not get much use with most other hi-fi speakers. Benchmark sells a Speakon-to-spade cable to at least give half of the Speakon equation. (I did have a chance to use the new Benchmark speaker with the AHB2 for a full Speakon connection, but only for a few days before I posted the amp review to EAN. The speaker will get its own review).

The audition
  The first thing I noticed with the AHB2 is the lack of idle noise. Put your ear to the tweeter, and none of the low-level hiss you hear with conventional, high-gain amps can be heard. With no signal, nary a whisper from the Benchmark — even when adjusting the sensitivity switch to the higher gain positions.
  As with the prototype listening sessions, I first played Warren BernhardtSo Real SACD, an album that has a full dynamic range and spacious soundstage — piano, drums and bass recorded direct-to-stereo. I connected the Oppo BDP-105 XLR balanced output to my Coda preamp then the pre was linked to the AHB2 and the amp to the Pass speakers.
  Versus the prototype, the AHB2 has switchable input-gain settings, which allows the end user to tailor the amp to various preamps. The Coda had no problem driving the Benchmark on any of the settings, but it took a few more twists of the knob to get a loud volume in the low-gain setting. I used the middle gain setting.

 According to Benchmark, the Speakon connector option ensures the best connection for a speaker/amp union and is more resistant to terminal oxidation, which degrades amp performance to speakers over time. 

  The Warren Bernhardt recording’s dynamic range is vast, and the AHB2 showcased its dynamics — with a live, accurate, musical portrait of the album, wrapped in a stunning smoothness. The transients were dead-on accurate — without the shrillness I often hear in bipolar amps. The AHB2’s sonic character is dynamic, open, with quick, taut bass — yet with the silky ease of the best tube amp. But tube amps don’t have the energy and speed in the transients, nor bass, that the Benchmark possesses.
  On the Gene Bertoncini - Body and Soul SACD, the production AHB2 relayed the same character — that warm, percussive guitar tone that I had heard on the prototype. This is one of favorite acoustic DSD recordings — with an expansive stereo image; Mr. Bertoncini’s expert, plucky dynamics were reproduced with precision and the album’s imaging is wide with oodles of depth between the layers.
  No matter what music I played through the Benchmark, the sound was always first rate in the midrange and treble — and with bass authority and smooth delivery at any level. And it did not matter which speakers were connected. Within each speaker’s character, the AHB2’s attributes shone through. Heavy metal. No problem. The fizz and thunderous volume of the Thin LizzyJailbreak CD was a bit easier to listen to with the Benchmark’s smooth (but not soft) delivery. Yet, this amp also handles the delicacy of a wide range of classical instruments, such as Janos Starker - Bach Complete Cello Suites on SACD.
  As a jazz guitar fan, I appreciated the AHB2‘s ability to convey the Kenny Burrell - Midnight Blue SACD, circa 1963, with that warm analog tape sound of Mr. Burrell’s Gibson hollow-body electric guitar. Ditto, for my audiophile LP version of Wes Montgomery - Full House and the Grant Green - Green Streets SACD.

An amp for the masters
  For recording pros and home audiophiles, who know their way around today’s record/edit systems, the AHB2 amp is definitely an amp to consider for those who like their separate amp and passive speakers. A small foot print, and honest, accurate amplification — without noise in an easy-to-monitor/zero ear fatigue mode. I mated the AHB2 with two Bryston Mini-T passive speakers (review upcoming) and Legacy Studios in my edit suite.
  With either speaker, the playback of hi-res recorded tracks, as high as 24/352.8 and DSD2X, was open, detailed and ultra smooth. The Legacy delivered that exceptional smoothness and the new Bryston speaker beamed copious detail from work station monitoring rig. I spent hours mastering jazz guitar 24/352.8 cuts from recordings of my precious Gibson L5 and Fender Twin Reverb — without one ounce of ear strain from the aHB2 and speakers — especially those Legacy Studios woth ribbon tweeters.
  I also got a chance to utilize three AHB2’s at the 2014 Capital AudioFest in Silver Spring, Md this past July. In a 5.0 system, the Benchmark amps powered two Legacy Expressions and three Legacy Studio’s with various samples from a Windows server, which provided stereo and surround DSD hi-res music files, Blue-ray and DVD Audio surround music, as well as spirited movie soundtracks from an Oppo BDP-95 universal player.

 The AHB2 multi-amp system delivered all the music and film soundtracks, along with plenty of my favorite stereo hi-res, in this medium-sized hotel room; the amp performance was perfection: a wide multichannel spread of instrumental layers, rock-solid center vocals and, best of all, the amps delivered the dBs without strain and exhibited zero harshness.

  The system delivered all the music and film soundtracks, along with plenty of my favorite stereo hi-res, in this medium-sized hotel room; the amp performance was perfection: a wide multichannel spread of instrumental layers, rock-solid center vocals and, best of all, the amps delivered the dBs without strain and exhibited zero harshness.
  In fact, on movie soundtracks, such as Avatar and the first Captain America film, viewed on Blu-ray, I had inadvertently pushed the level to 96 dB, but it did not sound that loud; I, nor my guests, succumbed to any ear fatigue. This is one of the easiest-on-the-ear amps I have ever auditioned.
  BTW, that ease and ability to deliver the finesse and fine detail, does not go away with the bridge mono operation. You just get more oomph (over 300 watts of extra oomph) to fill up the bigger rooms. And the noise still stays low.

The verdict
  In talking to various audio engineers about Benchmark’s amazing signal-to-noise numbers, I heard some skepticism and a array of opinions that an ultra quiet amp does not matter on the real listening world. “Any noise is lost in the music anyway,” one engineer said. But, as I said in my original first look last December, other audio components, such as DACs, players, etc. have shown generational improvements in measured performance, and I believe these improvements have brought audible, if subtle, improvements as well.
  For those who listen with very accurate, discerning speakers, an extra 20 dB of lower noise could be heard — in terms of ultra detail that may be hiding in the noise of an average audiophile amp. The -130 dB noise/dynamic range just gets us that much closer to the live music. After years of amps languishing in the 100 dB SNR threshold, Benchmark has pushed the mark way higher.
  As for specs, I had no doubt that the AHB2 would measure well. In our EAN SpecCheck, Bascom King’s tests (Click here to go to EAN Spec-Check) showed that the amp may be the quietest analog amp ever built. As good as that accolade is, I don’t hear a sterile, thin amp — attributes sometimes equated to amps with stellar measurements. The numbers confirm its impressive audio delivery.
  Like the Benchmark D/As and A/D, the company believes that great measurements correlate to great sound. In the case of the AHB2 I totally agree. I can’t wait to get two more for a full-high-end home cinema amp test in my big A/V room. For now, based on mostly stereo listening, it receives, with certainty, an Everything Audio NetworkStellar Sound Award.

John Gatski is publisher/owner of the Everything Audio NetworkArticles on this site are the copyright of the ©Everything Audio NetworkAny unauthorized use, via print or Internet, without written permission is prohibited.

EAN Audiophile Review!Legacy Expression Ribbon-Tweeter2.5-Way Passive Tower Speaker

$
0
0




Brevis...
Price: $3,000
Likes: silky top end, good bas
Dislikes: no way, too good for the $
Wow Factor! a serious entry tower
More info: Legacy Expression


by John Gatski
  Since Bill Duddleston re-acquired his Legacy Audio speaker company a few years, ago, he has been kicking out a whole new generation of speakers that appeal to a wide range of audio enthusiasts. Although the big speakers (Whisper, Aeris and Focus) get all the press, the small speakers are genuine bargains. Check out my StudioHD review from 2009.
  Legacy’s entry-level tower, the Expression, is an example of super-sound delivery, yet reasonable price from a USA-made speaker. In fact, for smaller rooms that can fit a tower speaker, It is a genuine bargain

Features
  The Legacy Expression is a 2.5-way driver tower loudspeaker, utilizing a 1-inch neodymium-magnet, spiral ribbon tweeter, a 8-inch midbass/midrange woofer (silver/graphite woven diaphragm, cast basket, phase compensation plug) and a second 8-inch subwoofer/bass driver, augmented by a ported enclosure. The silky smooth highs and spot-on bass output down to the low 40-Hz region — with the extra throw of a small tower — makes these speakers ideal for small-to-medium listening rooms, or as part of a home cinema system with use of a Legacy center channel or the small StudioHD two-way that I am a big fan of.

“The Expression gives those with more limited budgets a chance to sample the renowned Legacy loudspeaker sound. Dollar for dollar in a typical small-to medium room, the Expression is hard to beat for stereo or multichannel duties. It gets a well-earned Everything Audio Network Stellar Sound Award.”

  The compact tower measures 38.5-inches tall 10.75-inches wide and 10.75-inches deep. Its solidly braced MDF cabinet helps contribute to its 70 pound heft. The 2.5-way crossover, as described in the marketing literature, refers to the traditional two-way crossover of the mid-woofer to the tweeter at 3 kHz, plus the subwoofer crossover at 500 Hz to the midbass/midrange woofer. Spec-wise, rated frequency response is 38 Hz to 22 kHz, plus, minus 2 dB. Impedance is 4 ohms, and the room sensitivity is listed at 94 dB, with a 2.83V signal input. Power handling is 250 watts RMS continuous.
  The speaker includes bi-wire binding posts with included jumpers for single-wire use. The Expression contains two tone-tailoring switches to allow a mild cut in the treble and bass: -2 dB at 10 kHz and -2 dB at 60 Hz. Up is flat; down is the cut for each switch. The treble cut can even the response in a bright room, while the bass trim can knock down some bloom when the speaker is too close to a boundary.
  The Expression is a great-looking speaker and comes in a variety of finishes including the test samples rosewood option. The grill is removable, and to my ears, is more present sounding without it attached. Perhaps in a more live sounding roof, you can get away with leaving it on.

The set up
  During the review process, I set up the Expressions for use as an audiophile stereo playback speaker system, and as the L-R in a 5.1 system. I also used the 5.1 system at the 2014 Capital Audiofest for hi-res surround and movie soundtrack playback.
  Stereo listening components included a Rogue Audio Medusahybrid tube/class D amplifier, Pass Labs XA30.5 Class A MOSFET amplifier, and the new Benchmark AHB2amplifier. For preamps, I used either a Coda or the discrete output of an Oppo HA-1 DAC/headphone amp, via 1/4-inch-to-RCA adapter. Other demo DACS included the Benchmark DAC2D, Mytek Stereo 192-DSD and a Resonessence Concero linked to a Dell tablet. All interconnects, including digital and speaker cables, were furnished by Wireworld. Power products including Essence Reference II cords and power strip, were from Essential Sound Products.
  The multichannel system was set up in my main home cinema listening room and at the 2014 Capital Audiofest. I used the Expressions for the L-R, and three Legacy StudioHDs, which are very close in audio character to the Expression, for the center and rear surrounds.
  In my main 5.1 room, I powered the speakers with the audiophile caliber AudioControl AVR-6 multichannel receiver. At CAF, the speakers were powered by three Benchmark AHB2 amplifiers.

The audition
  I set up the speakers in the midfield — about eight feet away from the listening position with the grills off. The sound was immediately familiar upon first play of the Warren Bernhardt— So Real SACD. The similarity to my smaller Legacy Studios was undeniable. That silky smooth top end, generous helping of width in the imaging and very good, clean bass extension, plus more of it, were projected by the Expressions. But they filled up the room quite a bit more and offer increased oomph under 60 Hz than the Studios.
  The neo ribbon HF driver is key to the Expression’s, er, expressive top-end. This ribbon is accurate with zero harshness, making the Expression a speaker you can listen to all day long. The two-way crossover for the midwoofer/tweeter also keeps the audio focused in the more ear-sensitive frequencies.
  For a $3,000 speaker, the piano tone was very convincing when reproducing the a Steinway D from the Bernhardt recording. I heard much of the upper-register piano key percussion that I hear on much more expensive speakers. Perfect for that cocktail jazz sound.
  My jazz guitar SACDs sounded open and warm through the Expressions. Grant Green — Green Streets, for example, exhibited that warm, tube amp tone that I like. Anthony Wilson’s honey-hued Gibson guitar tone also was golden via the Expression when playing the Anthony Wilson TrioOur Gang SACD, Love that “Briitta’s Blue” track.


Expression (R) is a bit smaller than Legacy's ClassicHD

  On classical music, the ribbon tweeter is aces on string instruments. On a 2L, 24/352.8 Haydn cello duo. I could definitely hear the bit of extra depth of cello tone overtones that the best speakers pull out of this ultra-hi-res recording. Bigger, multi-driver speakers may give you more level in a bigger room, but the Expressions are remarkable in what they bring to the listening position. Lots of detail for a budget USA speaker.
  The Expressions could handle anything I put through them. Pop, Rock or Country? No problem. Daft PunkGet Lucky” disco/funk retro sound was presented in its full flair; nice bass, keyboard and guitar layers. David Bowie’s, hi-res version of “The Rise Fall of Ziggy Stardust and The Spiders From Mars” is a great transfer from the original master tapes with improved width and depth around the various guitar layers. All that extra sound comes through the Expressions. I especially liked the acoustic guitar intro on “Rock and Roll Suicide." Nice natural presence from the Expression’s ribbon tweeter.
  The Expressions vocal performance also is smooth — without excessive sibilance or peakiness. Frank SinatraNo One Cares album, now on SACD, features Sinatra at the peak of his phrasing and vocal power. The Expressions definitely do that recording justice. Just listen to the vocalist’s velvety tone on the “Cottage For Sale.”
  The Expression’s two-woofer system, augmented by the port, produce clean bass and were flat in my room down to 40 Hz, which is plenty low for most kinds of music. If you get closer to the back walls, the midbass may pump up a bit, but I kept my distance. You can engage the bass roll-off switch and plug the port if you can’t avoid closer wall placement. I tried it, and it definitely tightens up the bottom end — even at eight-inches from the wall.
  I did not have any speakers, sans the StudioHDs, in the Expression’s price range during the trial, but i did have some more expensive ones: my reference MartinLogan Montis electrostats ($10,000) plus and a pair of Pass Labs SR2 three way towers ($21,000). The Pass SR2’s had a bit more richness in the upper midrange and low treble, and the Montis projects a nearly unbeatable capability to separate instrument layers. But the Expression hangs right in there relaying plenty of hi-res music nuances and subtle resonance cues. It is definitely better than its price would suggest — in terms of audiophile sound.

  On a 2L, 24/352.8 Haydn cello duos. I could definitely hear the bit of extra depth of cello tone overtones that the best speakers pull out of this ultra-hi-res recording. Bigger, multi-driver speakers may give you more level in a bigger room, but the Expressions are remarkable in what they bring to the listening position.

  In the EAN surround system, I used two Expressions and three studios, one for the center channel and two for the rear surrounds. The Expressions integrated seamlessly with the Studio’s, producing a convincing dimensional sonic portrait for several of Tom Jung’s wonderful recorded DMP surround SACDs, such as Warren Bernhardt - So Real, and surround Blu-rays from 2L and AIX. I purposely ran them without a subwoofer, to see if Expression could kick out enough bass. Other than the lowest sub-35 Hz LFE sounds, the Legacys kicked out solid music bass.
  I took the same system to the Capital Audiofest, powered by the new Benchmark AHB2 amp, three to be exact. The DSD surround music, courtesy of Mytek Digital’s music server and Blu-ray movie soundtracks, played through an Oppo BDP-105, sounded great in my little demo room. Numerous show attendees commented they were impressed with the speakers — especially its clean bass output and easy top end.
  I had no complaints with the Expressions. They are well built, and were a cinch to to connect with my big Wireworld cables, and they are not that heavy to move around. And as a small tower, you can put them in about any room — except a really big one. The finishes are first rate, and this company really knows how to package a speaker for safe shipping, yet easy to remove from the box. 
  Legacy used to be a mail order/Internet order/phone order factory-direct seller, but now it has a dealer network of 22 dealers in the U.S.A. And it also has distribution in 21 countries, and now features a second line of speakers — for pro installation.

The verdict
  If you get the impressions that I liked the Legacy Expression, you are correct. With the expanding line of Legacy offerings on the top end in recent years, it is good to see that the company has not neglected its entry points. Like the compact StudioHD that I reviewed in 2009, the Expression gives those with more limited budgets a chance to sample the renowned Legacy loudspeaker sound. Dollar for dollar, in a typical small-to-medium room, the Expression is hard to beat for stereo or multichannel duties. It gets a well-earned Everything Audio NetworkStellar Sound Award.



John Gatski is publisher/owner of the Everything Audio NetworkArticles on this site are the copyright of the ©Everything Audio NetworkAny unauthorized use, via print or Internet, without written permission is prohibited.



Home Theater Speaker Review!Episode Triple 10 Powered Subwoofer:“Single-Active, 2X-Passive ComplementDeliver Major League Low-End Energy

$
0
0


Brevis...
Price: $999 (installer dealer only)
Likes: tight, clean, small sub bass
Dislikes: huh? this sub has everything
Wow Factor! big performance/small size
More info: Episode Triple 10

by John Gatski
 Snap AV’s Episode speaker line continues to amaze me with its high-end performance at great prices. The company’s Triple 10 Powered subwoofer reviewed here is perfect example of the Episode’s value/performance quality.

Features
  The contractor-supplied Triple 10 Subwoofer, priced at $999, utilizes a single 10-inch active woofer/two 10-inch passive-radiator arrangement in a compact cube enclosure that pumps out really clean bass down to about 35 Hz. Its onboard 500-watt (continuous RMS), class D BASH amp puts out plenty of level, and its array of controls offer just the right amount of adjustment — without being complicated. To highlight its great utility, the Triple 10 also sports balanced XLR I/O and RCA connectors (including LFE input) and remote trigger capability.
  The crossover is adjustable from 40 Hz to 120 Hz, and the phase control is variably adjustable from 0 to 180 degrees. The Triple 10 also features always-on/signal-sensor turn-on options. To make the sub an even better value, it also has speaker level inputs and outputs for legacy products, such as receivers and analog amps, that have no line I/O. The LFE/crossover switch allows the crossover to be switched out when using the sub as an LFE-only speaker.

The Episode Triple 10 subwoofer is  feature packed, has plenty of power and projects excellent bass performance for its size, making it a killer deal! In any room scenario where you would want a high-quality subwoofer in a small package, the Episode Triple 10 is damn-near perfect.

  The Triple 10 measures a compact 13.7" x 14.9" x 14.7" (H x W x D) and weighs a modest 43.6 pounds. The driver complement features one active 10-inch woofer — a woven, fiberglass sandwich-cone with 2.75-inch voice coil —and two 10-inch sandwich-cone passive radiators.
  I have always been a fan of passive radiator bass driver. The design utilizes the in-cabinet energy to augment bass performance. The passive radiator, a speaker without an active voice coil, releases the primary woofer’s box energy like a port, but the passive driver better controls that extra air, allowing a tighter, yet extended, low-bass response. And good passive radiator designs help control the mid-bass bloom when subs are placed near a wall; in my opinion, the PR is cleaner sounding than a port. Plus, they add in low-end frequency response extension at higher SPL.
  Episode also offers a smaller version, with three 8-inch drivers, the Triple 8 at $799. Its rated performance is nearly the same, though we did not review it.

The setup
  After a week or so of general music playing through the system for break-in of the Triple 10, I played a series of test tones and warbles tones calibrated for subwoofer testing. In my room, the Triple 10’s low-frequency extension was just shy of 35 Hz at -2 dB, in reference to the 80-Hz test tone. This series of tests were conducted in the LFE mode with internal crossover disabled. The sub could play plenty loud at the lower frequency limit, about 95 dB, and sounded clean — without cabinet or driver noises.
  I utilized the Triple 10 in my primary home cinema room. I placed the sub against the wall on the room’s left side, about midway between the main speakers and the listening position. Main speakers included Westlake Audio LC 8.1 L/R speakers, Westlake LC 2.65 center and two NHT One surrounds. Signal routing and amplification was via my reference AudioControl AVR4 receiver. An Oppo BDP-105 provided the A/V signals. All line and speaker cabling was courtesy of Wireworld. Power cables and power strip were provided by Essential Sound Products.


Triple 10 is loaded: XLR/RCA  inputs, speaker-level routing, etc.

  With real world movie and music soundtracks, the Triple 10 surpassed my low-end sonic expectations. Its clean bass and ample extension for such a small box, created an impression of smooth, loud, low bass — without a hint of strain. No, it did not go anywhere as low as my Paradigm Pro-15 (17 Hz), but most of home cinema’s real-world low bass is in the 25 Hz-to 100 Hz realm, which the Episode delivered in spades. Other than the lack of any under-20 Hz bass, such as the dirty bomb blast in the Sum of All Fears Blu-ray, I was impressed with the bass performance on LFE delivered movie soundtracks.
  On music, the Triple 10 is a perfect mate for small speakers. Its 45 Hz to 80 Hz performance is clean without any exaggeration or overzealous midbass bumps, and it sounds acoustic-suspension tight. A pair of these would give you almost perfect bass for 99 percent of the music that you play. At a reasonable level, this sub even played the essential bass energy of the cannon shots from the famous Telarc-produced Tchaikovsky — 1812 Overture with frequencies way lower than you can hear. Many small subs I have tried with this recording and grossly distort. The Triple 10 thickened a little, but output was controlled at 38 Hz.

The verdict
  Like the Episode ribbon-tweeter stand speakers EAN has reviewed since 2009The installer-sold Episode Triple 10 subwoofer is a best buy product., The sub is feature packed, has plenty of power and excellent bass performance for its size, making it a killer deal. One does the job; two would be perfect. In any room scenario where you would want a high-quality subwoofer in a small package, the Episode Triple 10 is damn near perfect. It also gets selected for an Everything Audio Network Stellar Sound Award.



John Gatski is publisher/owner of the Everything Audio NetworkArticles on this site are the copyright of the ©Everything Audio NetworkAny unauthorized use, via print or Internet, without written permission is prohibited.


Audiophile Review!Pass Labs Xs-150 Amplifier:“Super Class A Presentation, Super Class A Price Tag!"

$
0
0


Brevis...
Price: $65,000 per pair
Likes: amazingly open sound stage
Dislikes: really expensive, lots of heat
Wow Factor: a Vette or a pair of Xs-150s
More info: Pass Labs XS-150


by John Gatski
  In nearly 20 years of reviewing Pass Labs amplifiers and using various models as reference, I have followed the evolution of the company’s essential MOSFET designs. From the Aleph to the original Class A/AB X Series, to the highly regarded Class A XA models, the amps have steadily improved to attain Pass’ ultimate “musical” amplifier goal. The platinum priced Xs Series is the culmination of that evolution.
  Built to order, the $65,000 Xs-150 monoblock reviewed here and its big brother, the $85,000 Xs-300, are for well-off audiophiles who want the ultimate hi-fi amplifier — in terms of build quality, as well as delivery of a luscious audio sound stage that is the epitome of width and depth.

Features
  The Xs-150 is a 150 wpc channel, high-power, pure Class A amplifier that is built into two chassis-per-channel; one box houses the amp section and the other the power supply. They are connected by a twist-on connector, heavy duty power umbilical cord.
  At a premium price, the Xs-150 is equipped with high-end parts in the signal path, power supply, capacitors, etc. and includes such niceties as heavy duty speaker binding posts with solid-metal knobs. premium XLR and RCA connectors, and beefy IEC receptacle and power switch. The familiar, blue-hue, illuminated Pass analog current meter adds that bit of extra class. Normal Class A operation leaves the needle squarely in the middle.

  I have listened to a lot of amps in my 25 years of reviewing, but the ML Montis electrostatics/Pass Xs-150 pairing  delivered premium spaciousness in transients, reverb decay and instrument subtleties that make music reproduction sound like live music.

  The two-chassis-per-channel equals a hefty weight to manage in set up: 100 pounds for the amp and 130 pounds for the power supply. Even with rear-mounted, rack handles, you will need two people if you are setting up in a rack arrangement. I was able to unbox and maneuver the components for floor placement, but it took care, deliberate handling. I would not advise it if you are not used to moving 100+ pounds.
  Since 2007, Pass Labs has produced its Class A, XA.5 amps, using the patented Supersymmetry MOSFET design. But, according to Pass, the evolutionary improvements, based on previous designs, along with newer techniques, has increased the musical conveyance of the XS amp.
  According to Nelson Pass, the major design differences between the XA .5 and Xs are:
•Separate power supply chassis for lower electromagnetic noise:
•Upgraded power supplies with greatly enhanced storage capacitance;
•Banks of redundantly parallel high speed/soft recovery rectifiers;
•Improved high frequency noise filters;
•Larger (and quieter) transformers;
•Improved passive decoupling;
•Lower power standby;
•200 k-ohm input impedance, balanced with negligible capacitance.
  In asking Pass about the genesis of the Xs amplifier, he said that it is more evolutionary than revolutionary. “In 2008, we began work on the Xs amplifiers and ultimately drew upon a design features of the Aleph 0 from 1992,” Pass explained. “Like the Xs, it used a complementary follower output stage in parallel with a very large constant current source — enough to provide single-ended Class A bias to rated power.”
  He continued:”The simplified topology of the Xs amplifier looks like that of the ".5" amplifiers — except that the hardware is much bigger, and the bias currents involved are more massive. Also, there are some other details — involving new methods of applying local and global feedback and more sophisticated regulation of the voltages and currents.”
  Pass said that the sound of the best tube amplifiers has influenced the design of the Xs series, a characteristic I very much noticed while doing this review. “The working out of the details of the Xs amplifier depended very much on the information about the subjective performance we were obtaining with our experiments with custom SIT (aka VFET) transistors rendered in Silicon Carbide by SemiSouth. These parts captured some of those very elusive qualities belonging to the finest tube designs and informed the development of the Xs design, a process that took about four years.”


Rear panel connections: XLR, RCA and 12V trigger

  Much of the research and implementation of the Xs design also has been incorporated into Pass’ new XA.8 series of Class A amps, though with a bit more modest specs, Pass added. “The XA .8 series is very much the same topology as the Xs, but the hardware and bias currents are scaled down to reasonable values. The single-ended bias currents are much larger than those of the .5 series, but not enough to support single-ended bias to full power. It is reasonable to think of them as more modest versions of the Xs amplifiers — they are smaller — but they still make use of all the circuit details and parts that went into the Xs.”
  Spec-wise, the Xs-150 delivers 150 watts from each amp. Input impedance is 200 Kohm balanced; 100 Kohm single-ended. Gain, 26 dB; Bandwidth, DC to 150 kHz (-3 dB); and 30 amps peak output current. The distortion is rated at .03 percent at 1 watt and 1% at full power. Power consumption is 500 watts (with a lot of heat dissipation!).
  The main amp chassis and power supply each measure 19 W x 11.5 H x 21.5 D. The power supply section weighs 130 pounds; the amp chassis is 100 pounds. To conserve space, it is recommended to stack the amp chassis on top of the power supply chassis.

The setup
  It took me about an hour to wrestle the shipping boxes, unpack the amps and position them into my downstairs listening room. Although it is logical to use a partner to unpack and place these amps, I did it solo. Sometimes, you just can’t wait for a helper; I even managed to “power lift” the amps on top of the power supplies.


Big Class A power means big supply capacitors

  Associated equipment for the review included an Oppo BDP-105 universal player, Oppo HA-1Class A output DAC/headphone/line-out preamp, Benchmark DAC2-D DAC, Mytek Stereo192-DSD DAC, Coda and Pass XP-10 preamps. Other sources included Dell tablet with USB Audio Player Pro (up to 24-bit/384), Clear Audio turntable, and Rogue Audio Model 99 Magnum tube line preamp with tube phono stage.
  Speakers included my reference MartinLogan Montis electrostatics, Westlake LC 8.1’s, Legacy Studio’s and Pass SR-2 three-ways. In for review, I also mated the Xs-150 with the new Benchmark SMS-1 compact speakers (review upcoming), Bryston Mini-T (review upcoming) and the recently reviewed Legacy Expression tower.
  All cables were courtesy of Wireworld; AC cables and power distributor were provided by Essential Sound Products Essence Reference II. I did a lot of listening using the Oppo HA-1 discrete headphone amp output, driving the amplifiers through a 1/4-inch-to-RCA adapter and a pair of premium Wireworld unbalanced cables, but I also used other preamps as well.
  Though the factory nominally burned in the amps, I gave them an extra day of break in, uninterrupted. And the word burn has more significance when breaking in a Class A amp that idles at 500 watts. It takes about 90 minutes for the amps to get to full temperature; about 110 degrees on the chassis. And that heat in a closed room in Summer easily pushed the temperature into the mid ‘90s — even with the AC on.


Inside the amp chassis: more big caps, lots of MOSFETS

  In listening sessions, I could only handle the heat up to four hours before I turned it off for a break (and a shower). Bigger rooms should have less heat build up, and normal-use amp heating will vary with room size, ventilation and your willingness to nudge down that thermostat. Although I did most of my listening during warm weather, it is the perfect cold weather hi-fi amplifier.

The audition
  After a couple days of the, er, burn in, I was ready to listen. First up were my reference MartinLogan Montis, the advanced electrostatic panel-design loudspeaker with powered woofer from 300 Hz down. These speakers have the ability to present maximum musical space, in terms of depth and width, as transmitted by the upstream components. If the sources, preamp and amp can deliver the sonic portrait, these speakers pass it on. A good sonic test for any amplifier.
  From the very first play of “Britta’s Blue” cut from the Anthony WilsonOur Gang SACD, the separation of the Gibson guitar, drums and Hammond organ was astonishing through the Xs-150; I could almost walk between the instruments. And the extra sonic dimension just above the typical listening sphere, thanks to the Montis extra height gets more coverage as well. I have listened to a lot of amps in my 25 years of reviewing, but the Montis/Pass combo delivered premium spaciousness in transients, reverb decay and instrument subtleties that make music reproduction sound like live music.
  The general character of the Xs is definitely Class A; there is a warmth and smoothness that is very much like premium tube amp, yet the transients are taut and bass is focused. Versus an older first generation XA30.5 Class A amp that I had on hand, now priced at $6,000, the smaller, older amp is not in the same league as the Xs-150. The Xs' enveloping sound stage is much more live by comparison. The first gen X350.5 (current version is $11,500) is closer in sound stage, but still not quite there, plus does not have that musical richness on Classical and Jazz.

Pass Labs XS-150
The review pair od Pass XS-150s


  On the Janos StarkerThe Bach Cello Suites— the early 1960s Mercury Living Presence recording is a minimalist originally recorded with three tracks, but mixed to stereo. With all this musical “space” captured intact via DSD transfer, the Xs-150s showcase the cello’s sonic panorama. And the amp is so detailed that Mr. Starker’s breathing, bow handling noise, chair squeaks, etc., all could be more clearly heard using this set of amps. You can hear those subtle sounds with other amps, but they are more noticeable with the Pass Xs.
  And along with that audible delineation, the tone is rich and pure. The cello is big, not overly bloomy. The string harmonics are all there, and the aural picture is bigger via the Xs — versus other amps. The ability to deliver this open, musical sound stage with all the subtle detail, is the amp’s forte. Classical solos, duos, trios, quartets, Classical guitarists, Jazz guitar soloists, small jazz combos are like live performances in the living room! Really good hi-res transfers and newer hi-res recordings heighten the experience
  On the Steve DavisThought About You, a Tom Jung-recorded Jazz SACD from the late 1990s, that spacious, warm, yet dynamic tone — with percussion, piano and guitar — is world class through the Xs. The recording has a wide, instrument-distinct presentation with crisp, precise percussion and piano notes; the Pass takes it up another level with its ultra spaciousness.
  In keeping with the “minimalist recordings sound the best theme,” I played an “ultra-res” stereo 24-bit/384 acoustic guitar track that I made, using a new Taylor 810E guitar, recorded with two Audix SCX-25 condenser microphones through a True P2 discrete microphone preamp that fed an Antelope Eclipse A/D and Macbook Pro. The recording has intricately strummed and picked layers with excellent width and dynamics in ultra high res.
  Again the Pass Xs-150 transports these seemingly simple recordings into life-like performances. It does not sound exaggerated. In fact, it is super natural in tone and presentation. The amp finds the track’s essential bigness in the stereo image and passes it on.

  Again the Pass Xs-150 transports these seemingly simple recordings into life-like performances. It does not sound exaggerated. In fact, it is super natural in tone and presentation. The amp finds the track’s essential bigness in the stereo image and passes it on.
  My observation of the Pass’ character did not waver when using other speakers. All speakers may not have the space impression of the ML electrostatics, but the results were just as impressive within the character of the particular speaker.
  Through Pass’ own SR-2, three-way tower that I reviewed in 2013, the Xs-150’s spaciousness and solid bass performance on George BensonBreezin’ 24/96 DVD-A was quite a treat for my ears. The piano solo part on “Down Here On the Ground” emerged from the mix with the just amount of upper register tinkle.
  I also had a pair of Benchmark’s new SMS-1 bookshelf speakers for a brief couple of sessions with the Xs-150s, as well as the new Bryston Mini-sT (review upcoming). The Pass’ Xs-150‘s ability to project the image brings out the best in smaller speakers. You might think that these $65,000 amplifiers would need a big, premium, $10,000+ speakers to achieve their best. But even with small, under-$3,000, audiophile speakers, the amps shined their sonic spotlight. Piano tone really stood out with the Pass Xs amps and the new Benchmark speakers. (Stay tuned for that review)
  I though the Pass might be more of classical/jazz/acoustic music amplifier, which are often less processed. But listening sessions with numerous, well-recorded, less processed Pop recordings pleasantly surprised me. The 24/96 remaster of Led Zeppelin’s “Stairway To Heaven,” from the reissue of the Led Zeppelin IV HD Tracks download, really benefits from the Xs' wide sound stage prowess. The separation among the acoustic guitar and electric rhythm guitar layers interjects a breath of openness to this played-to-death classic.
  There are always going to be the extravagant products, but it is hard to make a quantifiable justification over a lesser priced comparator because high-ticket items are purchased for more than sheer performance.

  The Dire StraitsBrother in Arms DVD-A reissue also sounded quite good through the Pass. The title track, again, really comes alive. The percussion, guitar/vocal/percussion/accordion interplay gets that full spread across the image. And I was knocked out by how good the 24-bit/192 remaster of The Commodores' hit "Sail On" sounded; the song came from the 1979 Midnight Magic album, which is now available from HD Tracks as a 24/192 download.
  The remaster brings out all the multitrack embellishments of "Sail On," which are easily heard through the Xs-150’s big-ticket presentation. Subtle steel guitar licks, acoustic and lead electric guitar fills, funky bass line precision, shaker percussion really pop from this hi-res transferred track. I could hear these various instruments via the Pass and the Montis as well as I could through an audiophile DAC and headphones. Wow!
  As with most amps, heavily compressed Pop and Rock gets a bit mushy through the Xs-15; that bit of Class A warmness doesn’t flatter those types of recordings as much. Cleaner, less complicated Rock music work better, at least with the speakers I was using. I think the Pass X.5 series like my X350.5, which operates more in Class A/B at louder levels is a amplifier for the dense stuff.
  The Xs-150 tandem has no real sonic flaws, or any ergonomic negatives as well. Besides its astronomical price, the biggest negative is the heat. The inefficiency of Class A means lots of heat from two, very powerful Class A amps housed in four boxes. Even lowering the thermostat on the AC, located on another floor, I could not keep the listening room cool enough beyond 4 hours. Maybe if I had the rest of the house at 65 degrees I could have kept it under 85 degrees. Aah, the afterglow of Class A.
“The XA .8 series is very much the same topology as the Xs, but the hardware and bias currents are scaled down to reasonable values...It is reasonable to think of them as more modest versions of the Xs amplifiers — they are smaller — but they still make use of all the circuit details and parts that went into the Xs."
—Nelson Pass 

  We can’t gloss over the price either. Not everyone can plunk down $65,000 grand for amplifiers. It takes a fat bank account to buy these monoblocks. So where do the Xs150 and Xs 300 amplifiers fit in? are they a very expensive custom-built, Class A technology design designed to showcase the ultimate in Class A design where cost is not an issue?; Or is it a merely the company’s evolutionary top-of-the-line amp series that proudly highlights state-of-the-art, but also serves up technology that can be spun off into more affordable models, such as the XA.8 line.

The verdict
  In my opinion, the Xs Series is all of the above. Its costs means it will rarely be purchased by us non-wealthy audiophiles, but much of its sound can be heard in new models, such as the Xa-160.8 — a similar sonic signature, though at less current, and without the exquisite steel chassis and all the top-tier parts contained in the Xs-150 and Xs-300.
  Several audiophiles asked me, during the review process, if the Xs-150 sounds $45,000 better than a $20,000 amp.  There are always going to be the extravagant hi-fi products, but it is hard to make a quantifiable justification over a lesser-priced comparator because high-ticket items are purchased for more than sheer performance. Is a Lexus really worth double the price of a Toyota Camry? Depends on who is buying it. For those who can afford it, the Lexus has more bells and whistles, incteased performance handling and a certain, upscale prestige factor. It'd a luxury product, but it has its market.
  In my opinion, the Xs series (and other ultra priced audiophile products) are purchased for the same reasons. It was designed to give well-to-do Pass customers the finest Class A amp Pass has ever made — with no shortcuts in parts and build quality. And it happens to sound fantastic! I can’t give it an award for value, but I certainly can give it an Everything Audio NetworkStellar Sound for its exquisite audio quality. Bravo to Pass Labs for making it available for me to review.

  John Gatski is publisher/owner of the Everything Audio NetworkArticles on this site are the copyright of the ©Everything Audio NetworkAny unauthorized use, via print or Internet, without written permission is prohibited.


Speaker Review!Bryston Mini TCompact Stand Speaker:"Bryston Stresses Accuracy In New 3-Way"

$
0
0

Brevis...
Price: $3,195 per pair
Likes: accuracy, great imaging
Dislikes: sensitivty a bit low
Wow Factor: Bryston does it again
More info: Bryston Mini T

by John Gatski
  Noted for its line of audio amplifiers, preamps — and more recently DACs and digital music players, Bryston entered the loudspeaker game in 2013. Judging from the Mini Ts, up for review in this article, the company’s initial foray into transducers products is going well.
  The Bryston speaker lines includes the T-Series (Model T, Middle T, and Mini T), and A-Series (A1, A2 and A3 and the Mini-A. The individual speakers in each line are mainly different in numbers of drivers and cabinet size to accommodate various listening rooms. Each line also offers matching center channel and subwoofer for multichannel scenarios. Bryston’s speaker line was spearheaded by long-time VP James Tanner, who brought in a Canadian speaker company, Axiom, to help design the speaker.
  Designed and tested in anechoic measurement rooms, Tanner says the Bryson speaker line typifies the company's dedication to accuracy and hi
Features
  The Mini T is a compact, three-way passive speakers utilizing an 8-inch woofer, 5.25-inch midrange an a 1-inch titanium dome tweeter. The speakers dimensions are 22.5” H x 10.5” W x 10.0” D. Weight is a reasonable 42 pounds. The MDF cabinet is heavily braced to reduce any excess, accuracy-robbing resonances that can blur midrange and midbass clarity.

Whether you are an audiophile, semi-serious home listener, or an uncompromising professional recording engineer who still likes to match his own amp and speakers, the Mini T is a speaker you should consider.

  The rear-ported cabinet is triangular shaped shape — full width in front, narrow in the back. The bi-wireable speaker terminals can handle spades, banana plugs and bare wire cables. The magnetic-attached grill is removable. Standard cabinet finishes include natural cherry, Boston cherry and black ash. The Mini Ts comes with padded feet, and optional spikes are available to decouple the speaker from its mounting surface. Optional custom Bryson stands are also available.
  Rated specifications includes a 33 Hz to 20 kHz frequency response, +,-3 dB, 86 dB sensitivity (1W, 1meter). The crossovers are centered at 160 Hz and at 2.3 kHz. Nominal impedance is 4 ohms.

The setup
  My tester pair of Mini Ts were a demo pair, thus, they were broken in and ready to go. Amplifiers used in the test included my personal Bryston 14B SST2, (600-wpc bipolar output), Pass Labs Xs-150 (Class A, 150-wpc and $65,000 price tag), Rogue Audio Medusa(hybrid digital/tube 200-wpc), and Benchmark’s new ultra-low noise analog amp, the AHB2 (180-wpc). I even fired up an original 1964 Macintosh MC275 to mate with the “T’s.”
  Audition preamps included Coda, Rogue Audio Model 99 Magnum tube pre, and assorted DAC/line stage combos: Benchmark DAC2D, Mytek Stereo192-DSD and Oppo HA-1. I used Wireworld speaker cables and line stage cables for all the speaker/amp/DAC/preamp connections. As per my normal evaluation system, Essential Sound Product’s Essence II power cords and distributor handled the AC duties.

Simple, but effective: Mini T cable terminals


  Because of Bryston’s professional audio heritage, I also set up Mini Ts in my home-based recording studio room. Using the Bryston 14B-SST2 amp, an Oppo HA-1 DAC,  and a Trident 16T analog mixer, as well as my Macbook ewcording  DAW, the Mini Ts became closefield reference monitors for QC checking of direct-to-24-bit acoustic guitar recordings, as well as monitoring EQ mixes via the Trident.
  In the audiophile room, I Installed the Mini Ts on Apollo metal stands, about seven feet apart. They were angled in a few degrees, and I removed the grills. i did most of my listening with the grills off. In the recprding studio, I set the speakers on Raxcess Stand on either side of the Trident console.

The audition
  First up, I played several SACDs, including Warren BernhardtSo Real SACD, recorded direct to DSD by Tom Jung in the late 1990s. This piano, drums, and bass drum recording is a showcase case for the natural space of musical instruments, and the hi-res DSD captures all dynamics and detail subtly of room reverb, piano tone, etc. Immediately, I knew the Bryston Mini T’s were my kind of speaker.
  Starting with the Bryston 14B-SST2 amp, the speakers’ sound was open, with tonally-correct top end, tight bass and a wide soundstage. Dispersion off-axis was impressive as well, as I walked around the speakers. The Mini T pair's aural projection was neither forward or recessed, but a well-balanced mix of midrange and treble with a good dose bottom. As I played various types of hi-res music, the Bryston Mini Ts’ showed themselves to be an “everyman” speaker. It had no trouble handling Rock/Pop, Classical genres, as well as Jazz and Classical and acoustic music.
  Vocal music, especially female vocalists, were clean with no exaggeration of excessive sibilance. For example, on Linda Ronstadt's  “Keep Me from Blowing Away,” from the classic Heart like A Wheel album, now available as a hi-res 24/192 HD Tracks download, Ms. Ronstadt's vocal power came through loud and clear via the Mini T’s. Ditto for Tuck and Patty's - With Love CD. Great vocal delivery, immersed in Tuck Andress' beautiful guitar playing. This CD sound almost 24-bit.

Mini Ts on Bryston custom stands


  As I previously noted, the bass delivery was quite god for a compact monitor. With my RTA and the speakers well away from room boundaries, I measured bass flat to 38 Hz and the character was clean in the 80-Hz to 150 Hz midbass zone; no accuracy-robbing bumps. The hi-res download of The Rolling Stones “Beast of Burden” showcased that bass impression. The intro tom whack from Charlie Watts has enough power through the Mini Ts to give me a bit of hit in the chest. And the Bryston's admirably handled the cannon shots of the classic Telarc recording of Tchaikovsky - 1812 Overture. It did not reveal much sub-30 Hz bass available in the recording, but the audible portions — within the Mini T’s — range were pretty clean.
  I can’t say enough about the Mini T’s projection of the stereo image. For a small monitor, its ability to fill up small-to-medium rooms is above the norm of a speaker this size; it’s more like a small tower. Versus my the Legacy Studio pair, which is smaller bookshelf speaker, the Mini T has a bit bigger throw. The midrange helps. The Mini T reminded me of my much pricier Westlake LC8.1 stand speakers, but with more bottom end. A smooth, neutral character that lets the music shine through.

For pro use
  With its welcome accuracy character, I had no problems integrating the Mini Ts into my home recording rig. I used the speakers as a digital audio recording monitor system for editing and mastering tasks via my Macbook pro DAW. I powered the pro Mini T setup with a Bryston 14B SST2 or a Benchmark AHB2. I also used speakers for real-time monitoring while EQ’ing a series of digital audio dubs, via analog routing. The EQ audio was run through a Trident 16T mixer. One pair of the mixer’s line outputs was fed to the amp, which powered the Mini T's.
  On the DAW playback, using an Oppo HA-1 DAC/preamp as the line-out to the amp/speakers, I found the Mini T pair's generous helping of accuracy as a dependable tool for hearing the results of my work, My 24/384 acoustic guitar and jazz guitar recordings emerged with a spacious two-track image and lots of detail. No hype in the crossover region and a smoother top-end vs. numerous dedicated powered pro speakers that I have used. The sonic payoff of passive speakers and/separate amp combos was readily apparent. And Bryston’s titanium dome does not exhibit that hard “sizzle” I often hear in lesser metal dome tweeter-speakers supplied in low-end powered monitors.

If a professional can look beyond the fact that the speakers need a separate amp, the Mini T is a really good closefield monitor for professionals. This kind of sonic neutrality is what you want in a studio.

  In my EQ sessions, the Mini T’s easily allowed me to hear the subtle EQ changes that I made in the 2-6 kHz band of a rather dull pop recording I had dubbed. But the bit of presence enhancement added from the Trident mixer’s analog EQ did not emerge from the speakers as harsh or edgy — a trait of of a well-designed speaker.
  If a professional can look beyond the fact that the speakers need a separate amp, the Mini T is a really good closefield monitor. This kind of sonic neutrality is what you want in a studio, and I have heard many home pro system where the powered speakers were the weak link; that would not be the case with the Bryston Mini Ts and a good amp. Mastering engineers still use passive speakers, and I believe the Mini Ts would be a perfect fit for their audio suites.
  I had no major complaints with the Mini Ts. There was plenty of space for large wire connections and the bi-wire option. The 86-dB sensitivity is not as high as other speakers as I have tested, but I am sure most people will use amps with plenty of power.
  Speaking of amps, the Mini Ts match well to most any amplifier design. Obviously, the bipolar output Bryston amps are a natural fit, but other amps work as well. The Rogue Audio hybrid and Benchmark's low-gain/low noise ABH2 bipolar amp stood out for their detail and space impression, but even esoteric amps, such as the Pass Xs-150 and my old tube Mac, made the Brystons sound good.

The verdict
  The Bryston Mini T easily exceeded my expectations of the company producing a no-fuss, accurate loudspeaker with smooth clarity and excellent bass for its size. The tweeter is neither dull or sizzly, but exhibits an optimal balance of transient tonality, which contributes to an expansive soundstage for such a compact speaker. And its character was consistent from amp to amp, even with different designs. From an old Macintosh Mc275 to Rogue Audio highly recommend tube/digital hybrid and Benchmark’s ultra quiet ABH2, to a pair of $65,000 Pass Labs Super Class A Xs-150s, the Mini Ts always sounded good.
  Whether you are an audiophile, semi-serious home listener, or an uncompromising professional recording engineer who still likes to match his own amp and speakers, the Mini T is a speaker you should consider. (A pair of the Mini T’s and a Bryston 4B SST2 amplifier would be a perfect combo.) The Bryston Mini-T is definitely an “EAN Stellar Sound Award” winner. I can’t wait to test the bigger models. 


  John Gatski is publisher/owner of the Everything Audio NetworkArticles on this site are the copyright of the ©Everything Audio NetworkAny unauthorized use, via print or Internet, without written permission is prohibited.



Viewing all 180 articles
Browse latest View live